Answering Islam has posted an early张贴在回答伊斯兰教早 reaction反应 in objection to our publishing of在反对我们的出版 Han Kung on the Prophet Muhammad (P)韩绔嗯的穆罕默德（先知） . 。 There are several issues in this reaction by Jochen Katz, the de facto dictator of Answering Islam , that needs to be corrected.有几个问题得到纠正在这一反应约亨卡茨， 事实上的 独裁者 回答伊斯兰教 ，这需要。 We shall briefly respond to each of the allegations.我们将简要地回应每一项指控。

Recently I came across email exchanges that took place between Jalal Abualrab and the Christian missionary Sam Shamoun.最近我碰到了之间的邮件交换，塔拉巴尼和基督教传教士Abualrab萨姆萨姆的地方。 I have heard that the missionary Shamoun is a very abusive, malicious and nasty individual, constantly mocking and abusing Islam as his hobby.我听说传教士萨姆是一个非常侮辱，恶意和讨厌的个人，不断嘲弄和虐待他的业余爱好伊斯兰教。 After reading the mail exchanges, it became clear to me that this missionary is indeed a very arrogant and abusive person.在阅读邮件的交流，它成为我清楚，这确实是一个非常传教士傲慢和谩骂的人。 I was surprised to see that Katz, who generally maintains a polite tone, did not say a word to condemn Shamoun's abusive behaviour.我很惊讶地看到，卡茨，谁一般保持礼貌的语气，没有说一个字谴责萨姆的虐待行为。

In this paper I would like to comment upon the discussion and offer my own perspective, views and observations as a reader.本文我想发表意见的讨论，并提供自己的角度来看，作为一个读者的意见和看法。

This is not the place to review the history of Christian-Muslim relations.这不是去检讨的基督教和穆斯林的关系的历史。 This history may now be read in the erudite works of Norman Daniel.现在这个历史可能在读诺曼丹尼尔博学工程。 The reading is sad and agonizing.阅读是悲伤和痛苦。 The conclusion which may be safely drawn from this history is that Christianity's involvement with the Muslim World was so full of misunderstanding, prejudice, and hostility that it has warped the Western Christian's will and consciousness.哪些可以安全地从这段历史得出的结论是，基督教与穆斯林世界的参与是如此充满了误解，偏见和敌意，它扭曲了西方基督教的意志和意识。 “Would to God Christianity had never met Islam!” will reverberate in the mind of any student patient enough to peruse that history. “上帝的基督教会在从未谋面的伊斯兰教！”将在没有任何足够的耐心学生头脑回荡研读历史。

The book “该书“ Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible and Why错误引述耶稣：背后谁改变了圣经故事和为什么 ” from Prof. Bart Ehrman can be described as an introduction to New Testament textual criticism for beginners, in which he explains the subject in the context of his own background, relating his journey from being an Evangelical Christian to becoming a world renowned New Testament scholar. “从巴特教授埃尔曼可以说是对新约考证为初学者，他在其中解释了他自己的背景情况介绍的主题，涉及从一个基督教福音他的旅程成为著名学者的世界新约。 Besides DC Parker's除了直流帕克 “Living Text of the Gospels” “生活文本的福音” , Ehrman's ，陆国际律师事务所的 “Misquoting Jesus” “错误引述耶稣” seems to be the only book on textual criticism designed specifically for the non-expert readers.似乎是对设计的非专业读者特别考证唯一的书。

The following is an excerpt taken from “Christianity and World Religions: Dialogue with Islam”, in Leonard Swidler (ed.), Muslims in Dialogue: The Evolution of A Dialogue , vol.以下是世界宗教和摘录摘自“基督教：伊斯兰教与对话”，在伦纳德斯威德勒（编辑）， 穆斯林的对话：第一卷演变的对话 。 3 (The Edwin Mellen Press, 1992) by the Christian philosopher Hans Kung who conveys a Christian opinion on Prophet Muhammad (P). 3（中美小学教育，1992年）由基督教哲学家汉斯昆谁传达一个先知穆罕默德（规划）基督教的看法。 We do not neccessarily agree with everything that has been said here.我们不一定完全同意，已在这里说。

If you're new here, you may want to get regular updates via RSS feed.如果你是新这里，你可能想通过RSS饲料定期更新。 Thank you for visiting!Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi感谢您访问！莫哈末Elfie Nieshaem Juferi你
Recently “Freethought Mecca”, an anti-Islamic website of atheist persuasion, came forth with an article that claimed to have found at least one error in the Qur'an.最近“自由思想麦加”，是无神论者说服反伊斯兰的网站，带着一篇文章，声称出来时发现古兰经中至少一个错误。 The article (and its supporters) took pleasure in pointing out the irony of the文章（及其支持者）发生在指出了具有讽刺意味的乐趣 Read more ..阅读更多..

Was it on the seventh day or on the tenth day?于第7天或第10天呢？ According to 2 Kings 25:8-9, the “House of the Lord” was burnt down on the seventh day of the month:根据列王纪下25:8-9，耶和华的“楼”被烧毁，在本月第七天 ：

“And in the fifth month, on the seventh day of the month … burned the house of the Lord.” “在该月的第七天，在第5个月，...焚烧耶和华的殿。”

Yet, we are informed in Jeremiah 52:12-13 that the temple burned on the tenth day :然而，我们被告知在耶利米52:12-13该庙烧在第十一天 ：

“Now in the fifth month, in the tenth day of the month … burned the house of the Lord.” “现在，在第5个月，在该月的第十天...焚烧耶和华的殿。”

In one of their pages, Answering Islam had made the在他们的一个网页，做出了回答伊斯兰教 following claim以下索赔 with the clear intention of “poisoning the well” where Muslim sites are concerned.以“中毒明确意图以及”在穆斯林的网站而言。 The rest of the page goes on to either debase or discredit Muslim websites for their dependency on “atheist” material and preaching about the lack of “conscience” on the part of Muslims to abandon atheist material (notwithstanding the fact that most of the links on their page are either broken or no longer exist).页面的其余部分则由于他们的“无神论”的材料和对“良知的穆斯林的一部分”缺乏说教依赖放弃无神论材料（到任何贬低或诋毁穆斯林网站尽管事实上，大部分的连结他们的网页是不是破裂或不再存在）。