Answering Islam has posted an early張貼在回答伊斯蘭教早 reaction反應 in objection to our publishing of在反對我們的出版 Han Kung on the Prophet Muhammad (P)韓絝嗯的先知穆罕默德（規劃） . 。 There are several issues in this reaction by Jochen Katz, the de facto dictator of Answering Islam , that needs to be corrected.有幾個問題，這反應了約亨卡茨， 事實上的 獨裁者 回答伊斯蘭教 ，需要加以糾正。 We shall briefly respond to each of the allegations.我們將簡要地回答每個指控。

Recently I came across email exchanges that took place between Jalal Abualrab and the Christian missionary Sam Shamoun.最近我碰到的郵件交換，塔拉巴尼Abualrab之間發生的基督教傳教士薩姆和薩姆。 I have heard that the missionary Shamoun is a very abusive, malicious and nasty individual, constantly mocking and abusing Islam as his hobby.我聽說傳教士薩姆是一個非常侮辱，惡意和討厭的個人，不斷嘲笑和濫用伊斯蘭教作為他的業餘愛好。 After reading the mail exchanges, it became clear to me that this missionary is indeed a very arrogant and abusive person.在閱讀郵件的交流，它成為我清楚，這確實是一個非常傳教士傲慢和謾罵的人。 I was surprised to see that Katz, who generally maintains a polite tone, did not say a word to condemn Shamoun's abusive behaviour.我很驚訝地看到，卡茨，誰一般保持禮貌的語氣，沒有說一個字譴責薩姆的虐待行為。

In this paper I would like to comment upon the discussion and offer my own perspective, views and observations as a reader.本文我想發表意見的討論和提出我自己的觀點，看法和意見作為一個讀者。

This is not the place to review the history of Christian-Muslim relations.這不是地方，回顧歷史的基督教和穆斯林的關係。 This history may now be read in the erudite works of Norman Daniel.這段歷史現在可以讀取博學工程諾曼丹尼爾。 The reading is sad and agonizing.閱讀是悲傷和痛苦。 The conclusion which may be safely drawn from this history is that Christianity's involvement with the Muslim World was so full of misunderstanding, prejudice, and hostility that it has warped the Western Christian's will and consciousness.結論是可以安全地從這一歷史的是，基督教的參與與穆斯林世界是如此充滿了誤解，偏見和敵意，它扭曲了西方基督教的意志和意識。 “Would to God Christianity had never met Islam!” will reverberate in the mind of any student patient enough to peruse that history. “上帝的基督教會在從未謀面的伊斯蘭教！”將迴盪在腦海中的任何學生耐心地細讀歷史。

The book “該書“ Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible and Why錯誤引述耶穌：背後的故事誰改變了聖經和為什麼 ” from Prof. Bart Ehrman can be described as an introduction to New Testament textual criticism for beginners, in which he explains the subject in the context of his own background, relating his journey from being an Evangelical Christian to becoming a world renowned New Testament scholar. “從巴特教授埃爾曼，可以說是介紹新約考證為初學者，他在解釋這個問題在他自己的背景情況下，有關他的旅程從一個福音派基督徒成為世界知名的新約學者。 Besides DC Parker's除了直流帕克 “Living Text of the Gospels” “生活文本的福音” , Ehrman's ，陸國際律師事務所的 “Misquoting Jesus” “錯誤引述耶穌” seems to be the only book on textual criticism designed specifically for the non-expert readers.似乎是唯一的書上考證專門用於非專家讀者。

The following is an excerpt taken from “Christianity and World Religions: Dialogue with Islam”, in Leonard Swidler (ed.), Muslims in Dialogue: The Evolution of A Dialogue , vol.下面是摘錄摘自“基督教與世界宗教：對話與伊斯蘭教”，在倫納德斯威德勒（編輯）， 穆斯林的對話：演化的對話 ，第二卷。 3 (The Edwin Mellen Press, 1992) by the Christian philosopher Hans Kung who conveys a Christian opinion on Prophet Muhammad (P). 3（中美小學教育，1992年）由基督教哲學家漢斯昆誰傳達民意的一個基督教先知穆罕默德（規劃）。 We do not neccessarily agree with everything that has been said here.我們不一定完全同意，已在這裡說。

If you're new here, you may want to get regular updates via RSS feed.如果你是新這裡，您可能希望獲得定期更新RSS提要。 Thank you for visiting!Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi感謝您訪問！莫哈末Elfie Nieshaem Juferi
Recently “Freethought Mecca”, an anti-Islamic website of atheist persuasion, came forth with an article that claimed to have found at least one error in the Qur'an.最近“自由思想麥加”，一反伊斯蘭網站無神論者勸說，挺身而出，同一篇文章，宣稱已發現至少有一個錯誤的古蘭經。 The article (and its supporters) took pleasure in pointing out the irony of the文章（及其支持者）高興地指出了具有諷刺意味的 Read more ..閱讀更多..

Was it on the seventh day or on the tenth day?它是第7天或第10天？ According to 2 Kings 25:8-9, the “House of the Lord” was burnt down on the seventh day of the month:根據列王紀下25:8-9中，“上帝之家”被燒毀，就在第七日的一個月：

“And in the fifth month, on the seventh day of the month … burned the house of the Lord.” “而在第5個月，就在第七日的一個月 ...焚燒了房子的主。”

Yet, we are informed in Jeremiah 52:12-13 that the temple burned on the tenth day :然而，我們被告知在耶利米52:12-13該廟燒在第10天 ：

“Now in the fifth month, in the tenth day of the month … burned the house of the Lord.” “現在，在第5個月，在第十天的一個月 ...焚燒了房子的主。”

In one of their pages, Answering Islam had made the在他們的一個網頁，做出了回答伊斯蘭教 following claim以下索賠 with the clear intention of “poisoning the well” where Muslim sites are concerned.與明確的意圖“中毒以及”在穆斯林的網站而言。 The rest of the page goes on to either debase or discredit Muslim websites for their dependency on “atheist” material and preaching about the lack of “conscience” on the part of Muslims to abandon atheist material (notwithstanding the fact that most of the links on their page are either broken or no longer exist).其餘的網頁接著要么貶低或詆毀穆斯林網站為他們的依賴“無神論者”，鼓吹物質缺乏有關“良心”上的部分穆斯林放棄無神論材料（儘管事實上，大部分的連結他們的網頁是不是破裂或不再存在）。