If you're new here, you may want to get regular updates via如果你是新这里,你可能想通过定期更新 RSS feed RSS提要 . 。 Thank you for visiting!谢谢您的访问!
The missionaries in their在他们的传教士 latest最新 alleged claim of contradictions in the Qur'an have certainly outdid themselves in their travesty of logic and idiocy.据称索赔的矛盾在古兰经肯定outdid在他们的逻辑和愚蠢的嘲弄自己。 To cite the missionary claim, word-for-word:举传教士宣称,文字的字:
In the realm of the natural this is not possible, but for God it is possible; actually, it is not only possible, it is easy for God. 在可能的领域自然是没有,但上帝是可能的,实际上,它不仅是可能的,很容易为神。 It is rather ironic that, when discussing the identity of 这是相当讽刺的是,在讨论的身份 Jesus 耶稣 , the 时, Quran 古兰经 says that Allah cannot have a son without a consort, but Mary can have a son without a consort, because all things are easy for Allah. 真主说,不能有一个配偶没有一个儿子,但玛丽可以有配偶没有一个儿子,因为所有的东西都是真主容易。
They have quoted Qur'an 6:100-101 as follows:他们引述古兰经6:100-101如下:
And they make the jinn associates with Allah, while He created them, and they falsely attribute to Him sons and daughters without knowledge; glory be to Him, and highly exalted is He above what they ascribe (to Him).他们同真主的精灵伙伴,而他创造了他们,和他们虚假的属性,他没有知识的儿子和女儿;光荣他,并高度崇高远远高于他们归于他(他)。 Wonderful Originator of the heavens and the earth!奇妙发端的天地! How could He have a son when He has no consort, and He (Himself) created everything, and He is the Knower of all things.他怎么能有一个儿子时,他没有配偶,和他(自己)创造了一切,他是万物的明的。 S. 6:100-101 Shakir南6:100-101基尔
This, they claim, contradicts the general nature of the following verse:这一点,他们声称,违背了下面的诗句一般性质:
He said: I am only a messenger of thy Lord, that I may bestow on thee a faultless son.他说:我只是你的主的使者,我可以赐给你一个完美的儿子。 She said: How can I have a son when no mortal hath touched me, neither have I been unchaste?她说:我如何才能有一个儿子在没有任何凡人上帝感动我,我也没有被淫荡? He said: So (it will be).他说:因此,(将)。 Thy Lord saith: It is easy for Me.你的主耶和华说:这是难不倒我。 And (it will be) that We may make of him a revelation for mankind and a mercy from Us, and it is a thing ordained.及(将),我们可以使他成为人类从我们的启示和怜悯,这是一个事受戒。 Sura 19:19-21 Pickthall苏拉19:19-21皮克索尔
Unfortunately for the missionary, an understanding can be reached if a little more thought can be put into their argument.不幸的是传教士,可以达成一项谅解,如果想多一点,可到他们的论据。 The missionary has taken the understanding of these verses out of its intended context and is confusing Mary's nature (since she is only human, and hence procreates) as a creation of the Almighty, with God Himself who is the Uncreated.传教士采取了这些诗句中了解了其预期和混乱玛丽的性质(因为她是人之常情,因此繁衍全能)作为一个创造,与上帝是谁非受造。 Certainly, God Almighty could have taken a “wife” and have “children” or have “children” without any consort whatsoever ( nau'zubillahi min zaalik ).当然,全能的神可以采取一个“妻子”和有“儿童”或“儿童zaalik”完全没有任何的配偶(nau'zubillahi分钟 )。
However, if this were to happen, it would mean that the Uncreated nature of God would be affected, as anything that is “procreated” by God (as the Qur'an argues in 6:100) is created.但是,如果这种情况发生,这将意味着,非受造的神性会受到影响,因为任何东西是“卢永雪”的神(在6:100的古兰经辩称)创建。 In other words, to expect the Uncreated to “procreate” children, whether with or without a “consort” (which would also be part of Creation) is not only an affront against what God Almighty has told us about Himself, but is also a preposterous position only held by pantheists and the idolators.换言之,期望非受造的“生儿育女”儿童,无论有或没有“配偶”(这也将创造的一部分),不仅是对什么冒犯上帝全能已经向自己us,而且也是荒谬的立场只举行泛神论和偶像崇拜者。 It is certainly not in conformity with monotheism or how这当然是不符合一神教或如何 Islam伊斯兰教 understands divine transcedence.明白神的超越。
Ismail Al-Faruqi says that:伊斯梅尔铝Faruqi说:
“This is the first assertion of the Islamic creed that “There is no god but God” which the Muslim understands as denial of any associates with God in His rulership and judgeship of the universe, as well as a denial of the possibility for any creature to represent, personify or in any way. “这是对伊斯兰信仰的第一个断言:”没有上帝,但上帝“的穆斯林拒绝为任何联营公司在他的理解与上帝和宇宙统治权担任法官,以及一份给任何生物possibility denial代表,或以任何方式人格化。 express the divine Being.表达了神圣的存在。 The Qur'an says of God that “He is the Creator of heaven and earth Who creates by commanding the creature to be and it is…He is the One God, the ultimate… (2:117, 163).古兰经说,上帝说:“他是天上和地上的造物主创造的指挥动物是和它是...他是一个神,最终...(2:117 163)。 There is no God but He, ever-living, ever-active (3:2) May he be glorified beyond any description!没有上帝,但他,永远生活,不断活跃(3:2)愿他得荣耀超越任何描述! (6:100)…No sense may perceive Him (6:103)…Praised be He, the Transcedent Who greatly transcends all claims and reports about Him (17:43).” In fulfilment of this view, the Muslims have been all too careful never to associate in any manner possible, any image or thing with the presence of the divine, or with their consciousness of the divine; and in their speech and writing about the divine to use only Quranic language, terms and expressions which, according to them, God has used about Himself in the Quranic revelation.” (6:100)...没有意义可能会认为他(6:103)...赞美归于他,谁的Transcedent大大超越了所有债权和对他的报告(17:43)。“在这情况下完成,所有的穆斯林都被过于谨慎决不可能以任何方式联系,任何图像或与神圣,或用自己的意识存在的神圣的东西,并在他们的讲话和对神圣文字只使用古兰经语言,术语和表达,而根据他们说,上帝用在古兰经启示。约自己“ 1 一
Hence we say that the claim that:因此我们说,宣称:
S. 6:101 stands not only in tension to S. 19:21, but conflicts with several other passages as well. 南6:101站不仅在张力南19:21,但通道的冲突,以及其他几个。
is not only a premature conclusion from the missionary, but an obvious ignorance of the doctrine of tawheed and what Islam actually stands for.不仅是传教士从过早的结论,而是一个明显的无知学说的认主独一和伊斯兰教实际上代表着什么。
And only God knows best!而且,只有上帝知道最好的!
Jameal– > It was the critic who wrote the Qur'an who had the problem with Jameal ->这是谁写的古兰经评论家谁出了问题与
> language. >语言。 One is still not sure what the Qur'an means by the term一个是还不能确定什么古兰经的长期手段
> “Son” exceept it means someone produced in the animal way – Hence God >“儿子”exceept它是指动物的方式生产的人 - 因此神
> not having any consort couldn't have a “son” – but this is utter >没有任何的配偶不能有一个“儿子” - 但这是完全
> confusion. >混乱。
Asim-You don;t get it at all.阿西姆,你不要,真弄不明白的。 First of all, these arguments are primarily首先,这些论点主要是
addressed to the polytheists.给多神教徒。 Second, the polytheists acknowledged第二,多神论者承认
that God has children, but NO CONSORT.上帝有孩子,但NO的CONSORT。 The Quran is saying that YOU可兰经是说你
KNOW that God has no consort, and YOU KNOW that God created知道上帝没有姐,你知道,上帝创造
everything, so why is it you assert these beings as divine?一切,所以为什么你断言这些人的神圣?
The first verse he quoted was in surah Anaam, which explciitly states他引述的第一段歌词是在surah安阿姆,其中explciitly州
that “How can He have a son when He has no consort?” The same verses说:“他怎么能有一个儿子时,他没有配偶?”同样的诗句
discuss that Allah originated the Heavens and the Earth out of讨论真主源自天地出来
nothing, of which even the polytheists recognized.什么,其中甚至多神教徒承认。 The argument这个论点
entailed is this, and it is in this case related to the POLYTHEISTS. entailed是这样,它涉及到多神教徒,在这种情况下是。
They too asserted that God had NO CONSORT.他们也说,没有上帝的CONSORT。 Yet, they ascribed to God然而,他们归因于上帝
children.儿童。
It is demonstrating the absurdity, that that the polytheists never它是展示荒谬,这是从来没有的多神教徒
ascribed to God a WIFE, yet they ascribe to God children.归因于上帝的妻子,但他们归于神的儿女。
This particular verse, quoted above, is demonstrating the absrudity of这种特殊的诗,上面引述的,是体现了absrudity
having any chioldren based upon the Absoluteness and Transcendency of具有绝对性和超越后,对任何基于chioldren
God Almighty.全能的上帝。 Thus, the notion of ownership of everything in the因此,在概念的一切所有权
heavens and the earth and the mention of everything comng before God天地和一切的comng上帝面前提
as a slave.作为一个奴隶。 Children imply the same nature as the father, and this作为孩子的父亲意味着同样的性质,而这
strikes total root against monotheism.根系总罢工反对一神教。
First of all, the verse is directed to the POLYTHEISTS.首先,该诗被定向到多神教徒。
Secondly, they did not believe God had a CONSORT also.其次,他们不相信神的CONSORT也有。 Yet they still但他们仍
claimed God had chidlren.声称上帝chidlren。 Wow.哇。 Impressive theology.令人印象深刻的神学。 Why did they他们为什么
claim God had children?声称上帝的孩子?
Salam.萨拉姆。 Observational Science agrees with Al-Quran in saying that Man cannot have a child without Woman.科学观测同意地说,人不能有一个没有孩子的女人与基地古兰经。 Whereas Bible is in conflict with Observational Science in saying that Man can have a child without a Woman.而圣经中说,没有一个人能有一个孩子的女人与观测科学的冲突。
* I said Man because Christians believe that their god-father is an old-Man who lives in Heaven. *我说人,因为基督徒相信他们的神,父亲是一个老男人谁在天堂的生活。
As salaamu alaykum to everyone.至于salaamu alaykum每一个人。 I will go straight to the point.我会直接进入点。 The Holy Qur'an has refuted EVERY concept of sonship ascribed to God, whether intended as a metaphorical or metaphysical ascription.神圣的古兰经否定归因于上帝的儿子名分每一个概念,无论是作为一个隐喻或形而上学的归属打算。 Asim is right by saying that children imply the same nature as the father.阿西姆说是正确的,孩子的父亲意味着同样的性质。 A lion begets a lion,not an ox.狮子一见的狮子,而不是牛。 But in the case of God having children (God forbid!), it would be a tremendous absurdity.但在神有小童(但愿!),这将是一个巨大的荒谬。 God is al-Ahad (The One and The Only), that is, He is not just One; He is entirely Unique, transcending all kinds of limitations, comparisons, and categories.神是人,阿哈德(一个和唯一的),也就是说,他不只是一个;他是完全独特的,超越的局限性,比较各种和类别。 Even our Christian brothers-in-humanity would have to agree to this, otherwise they would have to concede that the concept of God in Islam is far superior to their concept of God.即使我们的基督教兄弟中,人类将不得不同意这一点,否则他们将不得不承认,上帝在伊斯兰教的概念是远远优于他们的神的概念。 If He is One, Sole, Absolutely Unique, the case of Him begetting (God forbid!) a son of like nature to Him would negate His Uniqueness.如果他是唯一的,唯一的,绝对是独一无二的,是那案件begetting(但愿!)的类似性质的儿子对他会否定他的唯一性。 If not a Unique God, then no better than the idols polytheists worship.如果没有一个独特的上帝,那么没有比多神教徒崇拜的偶像。 If His being Unique is negated, then the whole concept of monotheism would be destroyed.如果他是唯一被否定,那么,一神论的整个概念将被摧毁。 If He would beget one son “godling”, then there would be two Gods.如果他会生出一个儿子“戈德林”,那么将有两个神。 If there would be two gods, we will have two worthless, impotent gods who need each other, and who are no better than the idols the Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) smashed.如果将有两个神,我们将有两个一文不值,无能神谁需要对方,没有谁比偶像的先知穆罕默德(sallallahu alayhi佤萨拉姆)瓦解。 Besides, the begotten 'godling' would neither be eternal nor absolute, since being begotten means having an origin, and having an origin is not an attribute of God (Exalted is He against such allegations by Christians, polytheists, and their ilk!).此外,造物主'戈德林'既不是永恒的,也不是绝对的,因为造物主,是指有一个起源,有一个起源不是一个属性的神(崇拜是反对基督教,多神教徒,这种指控他,他们之流!)。 If the one begotten by the Eternal, Everlasting God is not an Eternal, Everlasting God like Him, then that creature wouldn't have been begotten, neither can we call it a son of God.如果由一个永恒的造物主,上帝是永远没有一个永恒的,永恒的神喜欢他,那家伙不会有造物主,我们也不能说它是上帝的儿子。 Again, a lion doesn't beget an ox.同样,狮子不会生出一牛。 Thus, not only the Trinitarian Christians, but all Christians who believe that Prophet Isa the Messiah (peace be upon him) can be called 'son of God' in any sense, metaphorical, metaphysical, or literal, are clearly in the wrong path.因此,不仅三位一体的基督徒,但所有的基督徒谁先知伊萨认为,弥赛亚(愿他安息),可称为'上帝在任何意义,隐喻,形而上学,或文字的儿子,显然是在错误的道路。 And only God knows best.而且,只有上帝知道最好的。