<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Christian Persecution Against Muslims</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/christian-persecution-against-muslims/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/christian-persecution-against-muslims/</link>
	<description>The purpose of this website is to facilitate Muslim responses to the various mendacious polemics and distortions of Islam by the Christian missionaries and their anti-Islamic allies that are being spread over the Internet.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Syed</title>
		<link>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/christian-persecution-against-muslims/#comment-31481</link>
		<dc:creator>Syed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/bismika/index.php/2005/10/christian-persecution-against-muslims/#comment-31481</guid>
		<description>'Muslims occupied non muslim lands,imposed taxes on pilgrims visiting their HOly Places'

So I guess that is worse than Christians killing and persecuting people of other sects during that time period

"you imposed high taxes on them simply because they were non_muslims"

I did? maybe the ismaili
s did but certainly not me

"THe natural response to all these discriminations is a non-Muslim ” jihad”. That was exactly what the crusades were. Christian reaction to Muslim enchroachment of CHristians territories way back in 693 ad and as far away as Spain."

O, certainly, Ismailis were doing this for a while, all of a sudden when seljuks come, they wanna go on a 'jihaad', like a bunch of cowards they kill innocent people muslims, jews and even christians, most of them just going for material purposes and some thought they were after jews in the rhine.

Spain? is that why a person withing Spain called for Islamic conquest of the dictatorship type of government run there, it becomes funnier taking into consideration, that they were allowed to keep their faith but when christians take over, nobody can keep their faith including Jews and Christians of otehr sects, yet when salaahuddin takes over jerusalem again, he doesn't take revenge, he let them keep their faith after the massacre of innocent people, which is exactly what you are trying to justify!  So, you tell me, who started it?  WOuld Native American now be jsutified if they rose up and killed whites in America?  Surprisingly, the states that were conwuered by Muslims were a bunch of kingdoms that did committ aggression and didn't let people spread Islam...please don't embarass yourself</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span name="Konabody">&#8216;Muslims occupied non muslim lands,imposed taxes on pilgrims visiting their HOly Places&#8217;</p>
<p>So I guess that is worse than Christians killing and persecuting people of other sects during that time period</p>
<p>&#8220;you imposed high taxes on them simply because they were non_muslims&#8221;</p>
<p>I did? maybe the ismaili<br />
s did but certainly not me</p>
<p>&#8220;THe natural response to all these discriminations is a non-Muslim ” jihad”. That was exactly what the crusades were. Christian reaction to Muslim enchroachment of CHristians territories way back in 693 ad and as far away as Spain.&#8221;</p>
<p>O, certainly, Ismailis were doing this for a while, all of a sudden when seljuks come, they wanna go on a &#8216;jihaad&#8217;, like a bunch of cowards they kill innocent people muslims, jews and even christians, most of them just going for material purposes and some thought they were after jews in the rhine.</p>
<p>Spain? is that why a person withing Spain called for Islamic conquest of the dictatorship type of government run there, it becomes funnier taking into consideration, that they were allowed to keep their faith but when christians take over, nobody can keep their faith including Jews and Christians of otehr sects, yet when salaahuddin takes over jerusalem again, he doesn&#8217;t take revenge, he let them keep their faith after the massacre of innocent people, which is exactly what you are trying to justify!  So, you tell me, who started it?  WOuld Native American now be jsutified if they rose up and killed whites in America?  Surprisingly, the states that were conwuered by Muslims were a bunch of kingdoms that did committ aggression and didn&#8217;t let people spread Islam&#8230;please don&#8217;t embarass yourself</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syed</title>
		<link>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/christian-persecution-against-muslims/#comment-31449</link>
		<dc:creator>Syed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/bismika/index.php/2005/10/christian-persecution-against-muslims/#comment-31449</guid>
		<description>BTw, it's quite interesting, how you cite such thigns in history such as the Golden Age and the Ottoman Empire when much of what you use today came as a result of that:

Carly Fiorina, the CEO of Hewlett Packard, recently gave a speech defining the relevance of leadership in today's world. Here is the quote from the final part of her speech.

"I'll end by telling a story.

There was once a civilization that was the greatest in the world.

It was able to create a continental super-state that stretched from ocean to ocean, and from northern climes to tropics and deserts. Within its dominion lived hundreds of millions of people, of different creeds and ethnic origins.

One of its languages became the universal language of much of the world, the bridge between the peoples of a hundred lands. Its armies were made up of people of many nationalities, and its military protection allowed a degree of peace and prosperity that had never been known. The reach of this civilization's commerce extended from Latin America to China, and everywhere in between.

And this civilization was driven more than anything, by invention. Its architects designed buildings that defied gravity. Its mathematicians created the algebra and algorithms that would enable the building of computers, and the creation of encryption. Its doctors examined the human body, and found new cures for disease. Its astronomers looked into the heavens, named the stars, and paved the way for space travel and exploration.

Its writers created thousands of stories. Stories of courage, romance and magic. Its poets wrote of love, when others before them were too steeped in fear to think of such things.

When other nations were afraid of ideas, this civilization thrived on them, and kept them alive. When censors threatened to wipe out knowledge from past civilizations, this civilization kept the knowledge alive, and passed it on to others.

While modern Western civilization shares many of these traits, the civilization I'm talking about was the Islamic world from the year 800 to 1600, which included the Ottoman Empire and the courts of Baghdad, Damascus and Cairo, and enlightened rulers like Suleiman the Magnificent.

Although we are often unaware of our indebtedness to this other civilization, its gifts are very much a part of our heritage. The technology industry would not exist without the contributions of Arab mathematicians. Sufi poet-philosophers like Rumi challenged our notions of self and truth. Leaders like Suleiman contributed to our notions of tolerance and civic leadership.

And perhaps we can learn a lesson from his example: It was leadership based on meritocracy, not inheritance. It was leadership that harnessed the full capabilities of a very diverse population–that included Christianity, Islamic, and Jewish traditions.

This kind of enlightened leadership — leadership that nurtured culture, sustainability, diversity and courage — led to 800 years of invention and prosperity.

In dark and serious times like this, we must affirm our commitment to building societies and institutions that aspire to this kind of greatness. More than ever, we must focus on the importance of leadership– bold acts of leadership and decidedly personal acts of leadership."

For the full speech, please go to:
http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/execteam/speeches/fiorina/minnesota01.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span name="Konabody">BTw, it&#8217;s quite interesting, how you cite such thigns in history such as the Golden Age and the Ottoman Empire when much of what you use today came as a result of that:</p>
<p>Carly Fiorina, the CEO of Hewlett Packard, recently gave a speech defining the relevance of leadership in today&#8217;s world. Here is the quote from the final part of her speech.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;ll end by telling a story.</p>
<p>There was once a civilization that was the greatest in the world.</p>
<p>It was able to create a continental super-state that stretched from ocean to ocean, and from northern climes to tropics and deserts. Within its dominion lived hundreds of millions of people, of different creeds and ethnic origins.</p>
<p>One of its languages became the universal language of much of the world, the bridge between the peoples of a hundred lands. Its armies were made up of people of many nationalities, and its military protection allowed a degree of peace and prosperity that had never been known. The reach of this civilization&#8217;s commerce extended from Latin America to China, and everywhere in between.</p>
<p>And this civilization was driven more than anything, by invention. Its architects designed buildings that defied gravity. Its mathematicians created the algebra and algorithms that would enable the building of computers, and the creation of encryption. Its doctors examined the human body, and found new cures for disease. Its astronomers looked into the heavens, named the stars, and paved the way for space travel and exploration.</p>
<p>Its writers created thousands of stories. Stories of courage, romance and magic. Its poets wrote of love, when others before them were too steeped in fear to think of such things.</p>
<p>When other nations were afraid of ideas, this civilization thrived on them, and kept them alive. When censors threatened to wipe out knowledge from past civilizations, this civilization kept the knowledge alive, and passed it on to others.</p>
<p>While modern Western civilization shares many of these traits, the civilization I&#8217;m talking about was the Islamic world from the year 800 to 1600, which included the Ottoman Empire and the courts of Baghdad, Damascus and Cairo, and enlightened rulers like Suleiman the Magnificent.</p>
<p>Although we are often unaware of our indebtedness to this other civilization, its gifts are very much a part of our heritage. The technology industry would not exist without the contributions of Arab mathematicians. Sufi poet-philosophers like Rumi challenged our notions of self and truth. Leaders like Suleiman contributed to our notions of tolerance and civic leadership.</p>
<p>And perhaps we can learn a lesson from his example: It was leadership based on meritocracy, not inheritance. It was leadership that harnessed the full capabilities of a very diverse population–that included Christianity, Islamic, and Jewish traditions.</p>
<p>This kind of enlightened leadership — leadership that nurtured culture, sustainability, diversity and courage — led to 800 years of invention and prosperity.</p>
<p>In dark and serious times like this, we must affirm our commitment to building societies and institutions that aspire to this kind of greatness. More than ever, we must focus on the importance of leadership– bold acts of leadership and decidedly personal acts of leadership.&#8221;</p>
<p>For the full speech, please go to:<br />
<a href="http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/execteam/speeches/fiorina/minnesota01.htm" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.hp.com');">http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/exect.....sota01.htm</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syed</title>
		<link>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/christian-persecution-against-muslims/#comment-31447</link>
		<dc:creator>Syed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/bismika/index.php/2005/10/christian-persecution-against-muslims/#comment-31447</guid>
		<description>About Early Caliphs:

http://www.islamicvideos.net/component/option,com_mtree/task,viewlink/link_id,18/Itemid,30/

About Crusades:

http://www.islamicvideos.net/component/option,com_mtree/task,viewlink/link_id,19/Itemid,30/

About Ottomans: 

http://www.islamicvideos.net/component/option,com_mtree/task,viewlink/link_id,20/Itemid,30/

See 5th video down about Islamic Spain:

http://kalamullah.com/videos.html

About participating with Hitler:

http://www.altmuslim.com/perm.php?id=1639_0_25_0_C22

"Christians have been persecuting Muslims in those years"

No, not Christians in particular, there wasn't really a religious motive, more so political, but that's far from the point, what's wrong is wrong

"Why should MUslims be focussed on the response to their military expeditions that were started by them"

O you mean like the Crusades, that were a response to what Jerusalem welcoming the Caliph Omer (RAA) in open arms when he conquered it as a response to their aggression?  No, the reality was, the pope was jsut mad because of some ismaili caliph hakim destroying some church, the seljuks rebuilding it didn't help, and yet you use this to justify killing innocent people including jews and christians, by this logic, I guess modern day atrocities which occur by Muslims, are by all means justified.  By th way, if you are gonna lie, tell a good one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span name="Konabody">About Early Caliphs:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.islamicvideos.net/component/option,com_mtree/task,viewlink/link_id,18/Itemid,30/" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.islamicvideos.net');">http://www.islamicvideos.net/c.....Itemid,30/</a></p>
<p>About Crusades:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.islamicvideos.net/component/option,com_mtree/task,viewlink/link_id,19/Itemid,30/" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.islamicvideos.net');">http://www.islamicvideos.net/c.....Itemid,30/</a></p>
<p>About Ottomans: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.islamicvideos.net/component/option,com_mtree/task,viewlink/link_id,20/Itemid,30/" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.islamicvideos.net');">http://www.islamicvideos.net/c.....Itemid,30/</a></p>
<p>See 5th video down about Islamic Spain:</p>
<p><a href="http://kalamullah.com/videos.html" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/kalamullah.com');">http://kalamullah.com/videos.html</a></p>
<p>About participating with Hitler:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.altmuslim.com/perm.php?id=1639_0_25_0_C22" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.altmuslim.com');">http://www.altmuslim.com/perm......0_25_0_C22</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Christians have been persecuting Muslims in those years&#8221;</p>
<p>No, not Christians in particular, there wasn&#8217;t really a religious motive, more so political, but that&#8217;s far from the point, what&#8217;s wrong is wrong</p>
<p>&#8220;Why should MUslims be focussed on the response to their military expeditions that were started by them&#8221;</p>
<p>O you mean like the Crusades, that were a response to what Jerusalem welcoming the Caliph Omer (RAA) in open arms when he conquered it as a response to their aggression?  No, the reality was, the pope was jsut mad because of some ismaili caliph hakim destroying some church, the seljuks rebuilding it didn&#8217;t help, and yet you use this to justify killing innocent people including jews and christians, by this logic, I guess modern day atrocities which occur by Muslims, are by all means justified.  By th way, if you are gonna lie, tell a good one</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ROB</title>
		<link>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/christian-persecution-against-muslims/#comment-10932</link>
		<dc:creator>ROB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 16:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/bismika/index.php/2005/10/christian-persecution-against-muslims/#comment-10932</guid>
		<description>The Crusades are expeditions undertaken to deliver the Holy PLaces from Moslem tyranny. Why should MUslims be focussed on the response to their military expeditions that were started by them.We see a lot terrorism provoked by Muslims. Mulims always do not condemn these actions instead always ask ppl to look at the cause of these violent actions. Why can't Muslims do the same. Why can't they look at the root cause of the Crusades. It is a shame that Muslims ignore their military xpeditions that were made into NOrthern Africa annexing Christian states there first these expeditions were started way back in 693 ad.They even managed to capture Spain. Many muslims consider this as their "golden Age". If islam does not support expansionism and colonialisation then why bother invading other lands.Muslims shy away when talking about the crusades causes, but talk gloriously about their empires such as Abbasiyah and Umayyad.Ottoman empires.
 tEHESE CONQUERING empires persecuting the idigenious Non-Muslim citizens by imposing jizyah, refusing them the permission to repair damaged temples and churches, not allowing them to high governmment posts altough it was their own territory.Why should Muslims control the lives of non-Muslims in countries that are not theirs!The westwas not the only destination of Muslim expansion, India was invaded by a small force of MUslims under Calipgh UThman Al AFFan.MOghul empire destroyed temples and built mosques on them.
 If these things were done unto them muslims would go on a jihad. According to Islamic beliefs jihad is a struggle against discrimination( at least wat you say). That's is the reason why yo guys go on suicide bombings etc. Palestinians say the Israelis unfairly occupy their lands , so their response is jihad. Osama says infidels should leave all Islamic lands, in order to make them leave he is going on a jihad. Southern THai Muslims say Thai govt is trying to destroy their Islamic way of life , so their on a jihad, shooting unarmed Buddhists monks and school teachers.
 THe same thing took place those days, Muslims occupied non muslim lands,imposed taxes on pilgrims visiting their HOly Places( I almost forgot Osama says he is on Jihad simply because Infidels should leave Saudi because it is the HOME of the Islamic holy city),you imposed high taxes on them simply because they were non_muslims, converted their Churches to mosques.THe natural response to all these discriminations is  a non-Muslim " jihad". That was exactly what the crusades were. Christian reaction to Muslim enchroachment of CHristians territories way back in 693 ad and as far away as Spain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span name="Konabody">The Crusades are expeditions undertaken to deliver the Holy PLaces from Moslem tyranny. Why should MUslims be focussed on the response to their military expeditions that were started by them.We see a lot terrorism provoked by Muslims. Mulims always do not condemn these actions instead always ask ppl to look at the cause of these violent actions. Why can&#8217;t Muslims do the same. Why can&#8217;t they look at the root cause of the Crusades. It is a shame that Muslims ignore their military xpeditions that were made into NOrthern Africa annexing Christian states there first these expeditions were started way back in 693 ad.They even managed to capture Spain. Many muslims consider this as their &#8220;golden Age&#8221;. If islam does not support expansionism and colonialisation then why bother invading other lands.Muslims shy away when talking about the crusades causes, but talk gloriously about their empires such as Abbasiyah and Umayyad.Ottoman empires.<br />
 tEHESE CONQUERING empires persecuting the idigenious Non-Muslim citizens by imposing jizyah, refusing them the permission to repair damaged temples and churches, not allowing them to high governmment posts altough it was their own territory.Why should Muslims control the lives of non-Muslims in countries that are not theirs!The westwas not the only destination of Muslim expansion, India was invaded by a small force of MUslims under Calipgh UThman Al AFFan.MOghul empire destroyed temples and built mosques on them.<br />
 If these things were done unto them muslims would go on a jihad. According to Islamic beliefs jihad is a struggle against discrimination( at least wat you say). That&#8217;s is the reason why yo guys go on suicide bombings etc. Palestinians say the Israelis unfairly occupy their lands , so their response is jihad. Osama says infidels should leave all Islamic lands, in order to make them leave he is going on a jihad. Southern THai Muslims say Thai govt is trying to destroy their Islamic way of life , so their on a jihad, shooting unarmed Buddhists monks and school teachers.<br />
 THe same thing took place those days, Muslims occupied non muslim lands,imposed taxes on pilgrims visiting their HOly Places( I almost forgot Osama says he is on Jihad simply because Infidels should leave Saudi because it is the HOME of the Islamic holy city),you imposed high taxes on them simply because they were non_muslims, converted their Churches to mosques.THe natural response to all these discriminations is  a non-Muslim &#8221; jihad&#8221;. That was exactly what the crusades were. Christian reaction to Muslim enchroachment of CHristians territories way back in 693 ad and as far away as Spain.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Critical Thoughts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Not the first time he&#8217;s done this</title>
		<link>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/christian-persecution-against-muslims/#comment-2534</link>
		<dc:creator>Critical Thoughts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Not the first time he&#8217;s done this</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 09:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/bismika/index.php/2005/10/christian-persecution-against-muslims/#comment-2534</guid>
		<description>[...] Come to think of it, perhaps I should pity the ignorance of the man. After all it was not Muslims who started the Crusades, incited the Spanish Inquisition or collaborated with Hitler during the Second World War. It is Christianity which is violent and calls for holy war, and not Islam. Christians have been persecuting Muslims in those years. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span name="Konabody">[...] Come to think of it, perhaps I should pity the ignorance of the man. After all it was not Muslims who started the Crusades, incited the Spanish Inquisition or collaborated with Hitler during the Second World War. It is Christianity which is violent and calls for holy war, and not Islam. Christians have been persecuting Muslims in those years. [...]</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
