1. 이슬람교도는 Muhammad (P)를 신으로 신으로 믿지 않으며 또는 그를 venerate 숭배하지 않는다. 우리는 그가 Moses (P)와 예수 (P) 같이 신의 메신저, 다만다고, 그리고 그가 저희 신의 낱말을 가져왔다고 믿는다. 그는 신의 그 자신의 개념작용을 생각하지 않으며 도 아니다 그 힘을 가진 이슬람교를 설치하도록 말했다 이슬람교도를 아니. 2. 이슬람교도는 Muhammad (P)가 Messiah다는 것을 믿지 않는다. 우리는 예수 (P)가 Messiah다는 것을 믿는다. 기독교인에 그에 관하여 우리에 의하여 동의하지 않는 유일한 것은 예수 (P)가 신 ("아버지")와 성령과 함께 삼위일체의 살아있는 신 및 또는 부분다는 것을 이다. 3. 이슬람교도는 "진짜" Torah (Taurat)가 Muhammad (P) 뿐만 아니라 예수 (P)의 오는 예언했다는 것을 믿는다. 4. 이슬람교도는 예언자 Muhammad (P)의 오는 예수 (P) 예언했다는 것을 믿는다 그의 복음 (Injeel)에 쓰고. 5 - 이슬람교도는 숭배 우상 또는 달 신을 믿지 않는다. Muhammad (P)가 달 신의 종교를 가지고 가고기 "이슬람교이라고" 칭하기 Cresent가 이슬람교도' 그들의 깃발에 상징인지 왜 이유가 다는 것을 아무 이슬람교도도 믿지 않는다. 저것은 Muhammad (P)와 이슬람교의 근원에 관하여 날조한 사기이다. Cresent가 우리의 깃발에 상징인지 왜 이유는 Cresent가 나타날 때 우리가 우리의 단식 달 Ramadhan의 시작하기, 우리 저 달 끝낸다 보름달이 조각달의 외관의 30 또는 31 일 후에 나타나는 때문이고. 조각달은 "신성한 상징"가 아니다.
6. 이슬람교도는 예수 (P)가 틀린 예언자이었다는 것을 믿지 않는다. 우리는 예수 (P)가 그가에 보내진 이스라엘의 사람들에게 실제 적이고 및 계시한 신의 낱말 온 Moses (P) 같이 신의 메신저, 다만, 및 그 태어났다는 것을 운명 아버지 없이 신에게서 낱말 그리고 정신으로 창조된 메리에게 무엇이든지이었다는 것을 믿는다. 우리는 그는 신의 아들이었다는 것을 그가 말할 때 기독교인이 살에 있는 신이어 예수 (P)의 관념을 오해한ㄴ다고 믿는다. 7. 이슬람교도는 숭배하는 신성한 숫자로 Muhammad (P)를 전망하지 않는다.
이슬람교도는 모두의 앞에서만 숭배하고 prostrate? 전능자 (신)와 아무도와 아무것. 1/3 of the entire Holy Qur’an talks about the Oneness of God and how God will punish those who worship multiple Gods and idols. 8. Muslims do not view the Bible as a man-made lie. We (Muslims) view the current Bibles of today as modified books, originally written by disciples of Jesus(P) that can now no longer be trusted. The Bibles of today had been tampered with and cannot be traced back to its original authors. We also believe that the Gospels that Christians currently have is not the one given by God to Jesus(P) in the first place. 9. The Holy Qur’an does not tell us Muslims to fight “Holy Wars” against non-Muslims to force them to accept Islam. Muslims are only allowed to fight in defence of Islam if we are persecuted with force and to retaliate with the equal amount used against us. In the Qur’? we read that: “Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for All?loveth not transgressors” (Qur’an, 2:190) Similarly: “And if you take your turn, then retaliate with the like of that with which you were afflicted; But if ye endure patiently, verily it is better for the patient.” (Qur’an, 16: 126) 10 - The Arabic word JIHAD is often mistranslated as “Holy War”. There is no such thing as a “Holy War” in Islam, nor does such a term exists in the Qur’an the authentic Hadith collections or in the early Muslim writings. JIHAD is actually literally translated as “struggle”. The word for “war” in Arabic is HARB. 11 - We Muslims believe in the Glorious Qur’an as the Revelation from Allah (God) given to his Last Prophet Muhammad(P). The validity and the authenticity of the Qur’an also do not depend on the confirmation of modern science or any of its human exponents in it. What is human is fallible while the Qur’an being the word of God is infallible and eternal. Thus, even if the findings of scientific facts in the Qur’an are invalidated, that does not detract from the beauty and rare force of this Divine Book, for a reader of the original in Arabic immediately experiences its beauty, power and grandeur without resorting to the use of rational analysis. And only God knows best!
Subscribe
Subscribe Articles With
Bloglines, Google Reader, My MSN, Netvibes, Newsburst
Newsgator, Odeo, Pluck, Podnova, Rojo, My Yahoo!, Desktop Reader
shery said on 16 October 2006:
The “Trinity”:
Now let us study the “Trinity” and its roots in ancient pagan worship. The “Trinity” of Christendom, as defined in the creed of Nicea, is a merging of three distinct entities into one single entity, while remaining three distinct entities. We are told to speak of the three gods as one god, and never as three gods which would be considered heresy (Isaiah 43:10). They are considered to be co-eternal, co-substantial, and co-equal. However, only the first was self existent. The others preceded from the first. This Neo-Platonic philosophical doctrine has its roots not in the inspiration of God, but in ancient paganism. Most ancient religions were built upon some sort of threefold distinction. Deities were always trinities of some kind or consisted of successive emanation in threes.
In India we find the doctrine of the divine trinity called “Tri-murti” (Three-forms) consisting of Brahma, Vishnu, and Siva. It is an inseparable unity though three in form. Worshipers are told to worship them as one deity. Such concepts posed no problem to the logic of a Hindu worshipper since they were already used to worshipping gods with the body of a man and the head of an elephant(Ganesh), or monkey-faced gods (Hanuman), or gods with six arms, and so forth. Remember, classical Hinduism dates back to at least 500BC, with roots extending as far back as 2000BC.
The Brahmas also have their trinity. In their trinity, Vajrapani, Manjusri, and Avalokitesvara form a divine union of three gods into one god called “Buddha.” The citizens of China and Japan also worship Buddha, but they know him as “Fo.” When they worship him they say “Fo, is one god but has three forms.”
Sir William Jones says:
“Very respectable natives have assured me, that one or two missionaries have been absurd enough to in their zeal for the conversion of the Gentiles, to urge that the Hindoos were even now almost Christians; because their Brahma, Vishnu, and Mahesa (Siva), were no other than the Christian Trinity.”
Bible myths and their parallels in other religions, p. 370.
The ancient Egyptians also worshipped a trinity. Their symbol of a wing, a globe, and a serpent is supposed to have stood for the different attributes of their god.
The Greeks also had their trinities. When making their sacrifices to their gods, they would sprinkle holy water on the altar three times, they would then sprinkle the people three times also. Frankincense was then taken with three fingers and strewed upon the alter three times. All of this was done because the oracle had proclaimed that all sacred things ought to be in threes. Remember that the philosophy of these people (The Greeks) is what was primarily responsible for defining the Christian “Trinitarian” nature of God. This was done through the writings of the Greek philosopher Plato regarding his “Logos” (”word”). Further, remember that the Gospels of the Bible were named the “Greek Gospels” for a reason: they were written in their language and based upon their philosophy.
As mentioned previously, T. W. Doane says:
“The works of Plato were extensively studied by the Church Fathers, one of whom joyfully recognizes in the great teacher, the schoolmaster who, in the fullness of time, was destined to educate the heathen for Christ, as Moses did the Jews. The celebrated passage : “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word Was God” is a fragment of some Pagan treatise on the Platonic philosophy, evidently written by Irenaeus. It is quoted by Amelius, a Pagan philosopher as strictly applicable to the Logos, or Mercury, the Word, apparently as an honorable testimony borne to the Pagan deity by a barbarian……..We see then that the title “Word” or “Logos,” being applied to Jesus, is another piece of Pagan amalgamation with Christianity. It did not receive its authorized Christian form until the middle of the second century after Christ. The ancient pagan Romans worshipped a Trinity. An oracle is said to have declared that there was ‘First God, then the Word, and with them the Spirit’. Here we see the distinctly enumerated, God, the Logos, and the Holy Spirit or Holy Ghost, in ancient Rome, where the most celebrated temple of this capital - that of Jupiter Capitolinus - was dedicated to three deities, which three deities were honored with joint worship.”
Bible Myths and their parallels in other religions, pp. 375-376.
Trinities were not confined to these groups alone, but the Persians, the Assyrians, the Phoenicians, the Scandinavians, the Druids, the inhabitants of Siberia, the ancient Mexicans, the Peruvians, and many others, all worshipped “Trinitarian” pagan deities (among a great multitude of other gods) long before the council of Nicea of 325 C.E officially recognized this to be God’s “true” nature.