If you're new here, you may want to get regular updates via如果你是新这里，你可能想通过定期更新 RSS feed RSS提要 . 。 Thank you for visiting!谢谢您的访问！
Refutation To The Myth By Etymological Evidence 反驳的证据的神话词源
Christians who try to claim that Allah is the name of the “moon god”, are influenced by the writings of Dr. Robert Morey, who wrote as such in his book The Islamic Invasion .基督徒谁试图使真主是月亮的名称是“神”，是伊斯兰的入侵影响的著作的书莫雷博士罗伯特，谁在他这样写道。 Regardless, they (and Dr. Morey included) are playing a silly game.无论如何，他们（包括博士和莫雷）在玩一个愚蠢的游戏。 The writings of Dr. Morey are nothing more than the thoughts of a mid-Western creationist closet-fascist, and were not originally intended for a wide audience.莫雷博士的著作是没有什么比思想更是中西部创世壁橱法西斯，并没有原先预期为广大听众。 Regardless, his “evidence” of a so-called moon deity named “Allah” actually hurts his religion as much as it does Islam.不管怎样，他的“证据所谓的月亮神命名为”“阿拉”实际上会伤害他的宗教一样，因为它确实伊斯兰教。 The basic claim is that the pre-Islamic Semitic world (not just Arabia) was the home to widespread worship of a moon god or goddess named “Allah”.其基本要求是，前伊斯兰世界犹太人（不仅仅是阿拉伯），是对一个月亮神或女神命名的广泛崇拜家“安拉”。 The problem with speculations about pre-Islamic deities from the Semitic world in this case is the fact that any inscription prior to the advent of Islam is also prior to the introduction of diacritical marks in the Semitic languages.与有关犹太人从世界前伊斯兰神在这种情况下，投机的事实是，任何之前的题词，也是伊斯兰教的来临之前的变音标记在闪米特语言的引进问题。 Why is this a problem?为什么这是一个问题？ Well, if one claims to have found evidence of a moon god named “Allah” in Palestine, Syria, or Lebanon, this claim applies to the respective deities of both好吧，如果一个声称他们已经找到证据的月亮神命名为“阿拉”在巴勒斯坦，叙利亚，或黎巴嫩，这种说法也适用于双方各自的神 Christianity基督教 and Islam.和伊斯兰教。 The first time the word “God” appears in the Bible, it is in Genesis 1:1, when it states:第一次将“上帝”在圣经中出现，它是在创世记1:1时，它指出：
B'reshit bara ELOHIM et ha-shama'im, V'et ha-arets. B'reshit巴拉莹等公顷，shama'im，V'et公顷，arets。
In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.一开始，上帝创造了天地。
While Christians will forever speculate on the word “Elohim”, honest Hebrew speakers would admit that this archaic word for God has a虽然基督徒将永远猜测单词“莹”，诚实的希伯来语发言者都承认，这条古老的字神一 history历史 that is lost to us.这是输给了我们。 The “royal plurality” hypothesis may be a possible explanation for why the word is plural, but this seems to have been unknown to early Hebrew speakers (such as the Jewish missionary who, according to the Kuzari, competed with Muslims and Christians to convert the king of the Khazars in the eighth century). “皇家多元化”的假设可能是为什么这个词是复数可能的解释，但是这似乎已如犹太传教士谁，根据Kuzari，与穆斯林和基督徒争相转换未知早期希伯来扬声器（在第八世纪的哈扎尔国王）。 It is difficult however to translate this word to “gods,” as the Hebrew text conjugates the verb “to create” in the singular.然而这是很难翻译这个词为“神，因为希伯来文”结合的动词“创造了单数。” Regardless, this word无论如何，这个词
Elohim 罗欣
is a plural forum of a more basic root-word for God, which is是一个更基本的根字的复数论坛，上帝，这是
eloh eloh
However, if one were to find the word eloh (alef-lamed-heh) in an inscription written in paleo-Hebrew, Aramaic, or some sort of Nabatean script, it could be pronounced numerous ways without the diacritical marks to guide the reader.但是，如果一个人找到希伯来语，阿拉姆语，或某种形式的拿巴迪脚本古的字词eloh（阿利夫-残废啦，嘿嘿）写的题词，它可以明显的变音标记很多方法没有引导读者。 This letter combination (which can be proncounced alah) is the root for the verb “to swear” or “to take an oath,” as well as the verb “to deify” or “to worship”, as can be seen as follows:遵循这个字母组合（可proncounced阿拉）是动词“宣誓”或“宣誓根”，以及动词“神化”或“崇拜”，这可以被视为：
The root itself finds its origin with an older root, el , which means God, deity, power, strength, et cetera .发现自己的根等等它的起源与老根报 ，即上帝，神，权力，力量。
So one of the basic Hebrew words for God, eloh , can easily be pronounced alah without the diacritical marks.因此，一个字的基本希伯来为上帝，eloh，可以很容易地突出阿拉没有变音标记。 Not surprisingly, the Aramaic word for God毫不奇怪，阿拉姆语意为上帝 2 2 is (alah).是（阿拉）。 This word, in the standard script这个词，在标准的脚本
or the Estrangela script或Estrangela脚本
is spelled alap-lamad-heh (ALH), which are the exact corresponding letters to the Hebrew eloh.拼写奥洛普- lamad，港灯集团（ALH公司），这是希伯来文的eloh确切对应字母。 The Aramaic is closely related to the more ancient root word for God, eel .阿拉姆是密切相关的更古老的词根为上帝， 鳗鱼 。 3 3
The Arabic word for God, Allah is spelled in a very similar way, and is remotely related to the more generic word for “deity”:在阿拉伯语中为上帝，真主是在一个非常类似的拼写方式，是关系到远程更为通用的词为“神”：
ilah 伊拉
We are quickly starting to notice the obvious linguistic and etymological connections between the respective words for God in these closely related Semitic languages (eg Allah, Alah, and Eloh being related to Ilah, Eel, and El, respectively).我们很快开始通知上帝在这些密切相关的闪米特语言如阿拉，阿拉和Eloh被有关伊拉，鳗鱼和萨尔瓦多，分别为（词源明显的语言和文字之间各自的连接）。 So, in conclusion, if monolingual tri-theists want to claim that Allah/Alah was the name of a tribal moon god, and that worship of such a deity is a gross pagan practice, they should throw their Bibles in the dustbin for including this deity in its text.因此，总的来说，如果单语三有神论者声称要真主/阿拉是一个部落月亮神的名字，而且这种神崇拜是一种严重异教徒的做法，他们应该扔在垃圾桶的圣经，包括本神在其文本。 They should also repudiate他们还应该否认 Jesus耶稣 for calling on an version of this deity while on the cross (as per the Biblical account).对于要求提供此版本，而神在十字架上（按照圣经的帐户）。
Interestingly enough, there is proof from a Christian source that clearly demonstrates the above.有趣的是，有一个是从基督教的来源，清楚地表明了上述证明。
The above book mentions that Ezra and the Prophet Daniel called their God as “Elah”.上述书中提到的先知以斯拉和丹尼尔被称为“以拉”他们的神。 The passage above is more than enough to counter the allegation made by misguided Christians about Allah being a moon god.以上通过，足以对付有关月亮神安拉是一个错误的基督徒的指控。 For, if Allah is the moon god, then what were Ezra and Daniel worshipping?因为，如果真主是月亮神，然后什么都以斯拉和丹尼尔崇拜？
Conclusion 结论
Pantheist/Buddhist thinker Brett Neichin has said of Christians that they are reformed Jews and do not even know it.泛神论/佛教思想家布雷特Neichin已表示，他们是改革的犹太人，甚至不知道它的基督徒。 Indeed, much of Christianity finds its roots in the Semitic world, yet the believers of this religion are notorious for their interpretations of the faith in a European world view.事实上，许多处于基督教世界的犹太人的根源，然而这个宗教的信徒几乎都是在欧洲的世界观信仰的解释。 This is the reason they would actually try to find fault with a religion that acknowledges the existence of the exact same God they do; this is the reason they would erroneously claim that Eloh, Alah, and Allah are different Gods.这是因为他们实际上试图找到一种宗教，承认了上帝的存在完全相同的故障，他们这样做，这就是为什么他们会错误地声称Eloh，阿拉，真主是不同的神。
The question of why Islam adopted the crescent moon as its symbol, or why it uses the lunar calendar, is addressed in伊斯兰教通过，为什么作为其标志，或为什么新月它使用阴历的问题，是处理 What is the Significance of the Crescent Moon in Islam? 什么是伊斯兰教的意义月球新月？
And certainly, only God knows best!当然，最好的只有天晓得！
- Milon Ben-Y'hudaah, Ivri-Angli (Ben Yehuda's Hebrew-English Dictionary), under ALEF LAMED HEH (ALH) [ 夏美隆本Y'hudaah，伊夫里，Angli（本耶胡达的希伯来文，英文词典），在阿利夫一直困扰着港灯（ALH公司）[ back背面 ] ]
- According to the Lexicon offered at根据提供的在词典 http://www.peshitta.org http://www.peshitta.org . 。 [ [ back背面 ] ]
- According to Robert Oshana's Online Introduction to Basic Assyrian Aramaic , which is at据罗伯特奥沙纳在线亚述阿拉姆介绍基本法 ，这是在 http://learnassyrian.com http://learnassyrian.com . 。 [ [ back背面 ] ]
- WE Vine, Merrill F. Unger, William White Jr., Vine's Complete Exposition Dictionary , Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville, TN, 1996 [我们葡萄，美林楼昂格尔，小威廉白， 葡萄的完全博览会词典 ，托马斯纳尔逊出版，纳什维尔，田纳西州，1996 [ back背面 ] ]
2 Responses for 2回应为 "Do Muslims Worship The Moon God?" “穆斯林所崇拜月亮神吗？”
oufff this will show the missionaries wats true :D oufff这将显示传教士沃茨真：搭扣
Dr.Robert Morey proves in his book that Allaah is the name of the moon god worshipped in Arabia before Islam. Dr.Robert莫雷证明真主是月亮神的名字在沙特阿拉伯伊斯兰教礼拜前，在他的著作。 Is he right?他是正确的？
Answer答案
The book you refer to is entitled The Islamic Invasion: Confronting the World's Fastest Growing Religion.这本书你指的是伊斯兰入侵题为：面对世界上成长最快的宗教。 The author, Dr.Robert Morey, sees Islam as an invasion into North America and a threat to his religious heritage.笔者，Dr.Robert莫雷认为作为进入北美的入侵和对他的伊斯兰宗教传统的威胁。 Unfortunately, Dr.Morey has resorted to dishonest tactics in combatting Islam.不幸的是，Dr.Morey已采取不诚实的手段打击伊斯兰教。 To prove his contention that Allaah is not the God of Christians and Jews, he quoted from several books in such a dishonest fashion that the quotations say the opposite of what we find in those books.为了证明他的论点，即真主是不是基督徒和犹太人的神，他引用了这样一个不诚实的方式，该报价从几本书说的是我们在那些书找到相反。
Dr.Morey quoted from the Encyclopedia Britannica to support his case. Dr.Morey引用了大英百科全书，以支持他的案件。 But in fact the Encyclopedia says:但其实百科全书说：
“Allaah is the standard Arabic word for “God” and is used by Arab Christians as well as by Muslims” (Britannica, 1990 Edition, vol.1, p.276). “真主是标准的阿拉伯语意为”上帝“，是利用阿拉伯基督徒以及穆斯林”（大英百科全书，1990年版，第一卷，p.276）。
Dr.Morey also quoted from HARGibb to support his case. Dr.Morey还引用了HARGibb来支持他的案件。 But Gibb actually says the opposite.但吉布说，其实相反。 In his book Mohammedanism, Gibb says on page 26 that both Muhammad and his opponents believed in “the existence of a supreme God Allaah.” Gibb further explained this on pages 37-38.在他的书中回教，吉布说，第26页，无论穆罕默德和“一个至高无上的神安拉的存在，相信他的对手。”吉布进一步解释这一页37-38。 Dr.Morey should have checked his references more carefully before his book went into print. Dr.Morey应该更仔细地检查他的书中，他引用前进入打印。
Dr.Morey said that Alfred Guillaume agrees with him, and he refers to page 7 of Alfred Guillaume's book entitled Islam. Dr.Morey说，阿尔弗雷德纪尧姆同意他，他指的是伊斯兰页题为阿尔弗雷德纪尧姆的书7。 But here is what Alfred Guillaume actually says on page 7 of his book:但这里是阿尔弗雷德纪尧姆实际上他的书页上的7说：
“In Arabia Allaah was known from Christian and Jewish sources as the one God, and there can be no doubt whatever that he was known to the pagan Arabs of Mecca as the supreme being.” How could Dr.Morey Misquote like this?他说：“真主是已知的由阿拉伯基督徒和犹太人作为一个神源，不可能有任何疑问，他是众所周知的异教徒的阿拉伯人的麦加作为至高无上的。”怎么会这样Dr.Morey引述错误？
Dr.Morey quoted from page 28 of a book by another non-Muslim writer Caesar Farah. Dr.Morey引述28页的书由另一个非穆斯林作家凯撒法拉赫。 But when we refer to that book we find that Dr.Morey gave only a partial quotation which leaves out the main discussion.但是，当我们提到这本书中，我们发现，Dr.Morey只给了一个局部的报价是遗漏了主要的讨论。 The book actually says that the God who was called II by the Babylonians and El by the Israelites was called ilah, al-ilah, and eventually Allaah in Arabia.该书实际上是说，谁是所谓的巴比伦人和El II是以色列人的神被称为伊拉，基地伊拉，并最终在阿拉伯真主。 Farah, says further on page 31 that before Islam the pagans had already believed that Allaah is the supreme deity.法拉赫说，进一步第31页前伊斯兰的异教徒已经相信，真主是至高无上的神。 Of course they had 360 idols, but, contrary to Dr.Morey's assertion, Allaah was never one of the 360 idols.当然，他们有360偶像，但是，违反Dr.Morey的说法，真主是从来没有一本360偶像。 As Caesar Farah points out on page 56, the prophet Muhammad, on whom be peace, personally destroyed those idols.正如恺撒法拉赫指出第56页，先知穆罕默德，谁是和平，亲自摧毁那些偶像。
Dr.Morey also quoted from William Montgomery Watt. Dr.Morey还引用了威廉蒙哥马利瓦特。 But Watt says on page 26 of his book that the Arabic word Allaah is similar to the Greek term ho theos which we know is the way God is referred to in the New Testament.但是，瓦特他的书页上说，26日阿拉伯字真主是类似于希腊来说，我们知道浩西奥斯是上帝被称为新约的处理方式。
Dr.Morey quoted from Kenneth Cragg's book entitled The Call of the Minaret. Dr.Morey引用了题为的尖塔呼叫肯尼思克拉格的书。 However, on page 36 of Kenneth Cragg's book we find the following: “Since both Christian and Muslim faiths believe in One supreme sovereign Creator-God, they are obviously referring when they speak of Him, under whatever terms, to the same Being.”但是，关于肯尼思克拉格的书第36页，我们发现以下：由于基督徒和穆斯林信仰“在一个至高无上的主权造物主，上帝认为，他们显然是指当他们谈论他，在任何条件下，为了同样存在。”
Further on the same page, Cragg explains that the One whom the Muslims call Allaah is the same One whom the Christians call 'the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.'此外在同一页上，克拉格解释说，一个人的穆斯林称真主是同一个基督徒的人称为'上帝与我们主耶稣基督的父。 although the two faiths understand Him differently.虽然这两个不同的信仰理解他。
Dr.Morey should know that as a scholar he has the academic obligation to quote honestly. Dr.Morey应该知道，作为一个学者，他的学术诚实报价义务。 He should also know that as a follower of Jesus, on whom be peace, he has an obligation to speak the truth.他应该也知道，作为耶稣的信徒，谁是和平，他有责任说出真相。