“Does the “是否 Bible 聖經 use language not fitting for God?” 使用的語言不恰當的上帝嗎？“

This was the question that a missionary rhetorically這是修辭問題，一個傳教士 posed構成 to his readers in an amusing but vain attempt to “defend” the inappropriate and unnatural language of Ezekiel 23.他的讀者在有趣，但妄圖以“守”不適當和不自然的語言以西結 23。 The funny thing that this author have noticed about his whole “defense” (and which also prompted this author to write this short commentary) is that even though he openly accuse Muslims of being “ignorant” about the matter, he reduced the whole passage of Ezekiel 23 to有趣的是筆者已經注意到他的整個“防禦”（而且也促使筆者寫這篇短評）是，儘管他公開指責穆斯林被“無知”關於此事，他減少了整個通道的以西結書 23 a link連結 and a short summary.和一個簡短的摘要。 Is the missionary acting “prudish” in trying to dismiss the whole issue away so casually?是傳教士行事“假正經”試圖解僱了整個問題如此隨便？ It certainly seems so to this author.這當然顯得那麼這位作者。

Ezekiel 23 And Its Problems 以西結書23和存在的問題

We wish to settle the matter once and for all by publishing in full the scans from the whole chapter of Ezekiel 23 so as readers may understand the Muslim objection to this passage.我們希望一勞永逸地解決這一問題所發表的所有全部的掃描，從整章以西結書 23歲，作為讀者可以了解穆斯林反對這段話。 Please be advised that we do not recommend anyone who have not yet reached the age of puberty to read this disgusting and sordid passage .請注意， 我們不建議任何人誰尚未達到青春期的年齡讀這噁心和骯髒的通道 。

The missionary has also made the accusation that:傳教士也取得了指責：

“[i]t is only ignorance of the inspired scriptures that results in such outragious [sic] claim.” “[我] T是只有無知的聖經的啟發的結果，如outragious [原文]索賠。”

On the contrary, we object to the passage not because of its main message, but because of its erotic imagery and inappropriate language .相反，我們反對通過，不是因為它的主要信息，但由於它的色情圖像和不恰當的語言 。 Furthermore, it is described as a historical event and the reader would unconsciously form imagery which is unworthy of being attributed to God Almighty.此外，它被描述為一個歷史事件，讀者會不自覺地形成意象是不值得被歸於全能的上帝。 We would like to ask the reader: would it be appropriate for a parent to rent a pornographic video and show it to his children below 8 years old, and all the time saying, “Do not commit fornication, it is an evil and a sin to do so”?我們要問讀者：會是恰當的父母租色情影片，並顯示了他的8歲以下兒童，所有的時間說，“不要行姦淫，它是一個邪惡的罪這樣做“？ Would anyone in their right mind do such a thing?難道會有人在他們的頭腦清醒做這樣的事？ This is what the missionary ignorantly expects us to believe.這是無知地期望我們的傳教士相信。

Missionary Objections And The Response 反對傳教士和響應

He also expects us to swallow the idea that the so-called “strong imagery” of the following verse of the Qur'an is as objectionable as the erotic passage of Ezekiel 23:他還預計，我們要吞下的設想，即所謂的“強勢形象”的下列詩句的古蘭經是反感的色情通道以西結 23：

“And do not spy, neither backbite one another; would any of you like to eat the flesh of his brother dead?” (Qur'an, 49:12) “不要諜，彼此都讒，將任何你喜歡吃的肉，他的弟弟死了嗎？”（古蘭經，49:12）

The Qur'an in this verse does not give a detailed imagery of how one eats the flesh of another.古蘭經在這首詩不作詳細的圖像，如何一吃了肉另一個。 Rather, it simply analogises backbiting to the act of cannibalism.相反，它只是analogises誹謗的行為自相殘殺。 It does not contain any objectionable language, it does not describe how cannibalism is attempted in detail and most certainly it does not emit erotic imagery not befitting of God Almighty.它不包含任何反感的用語，它不介紹如何吃人是企圖在細節和肯定不會釋放色情圖像不相稱的上帝。

In conclusion, the Muslim objection to Ezekiel 23 is a valid one.總之，穆斯林反對以西結書 23是正確的。 The Christian missionary should explain to his readers what benefit does the language of Ezekiel 23 offer, apart from inciting its readers to submit to their erotic feelings to commit rape and fornication?基督教傳教士應解釋他的讀者的語言什麼好處以西結 23報價，除了煽動其讀者提交他們的性愛感情犯下強姦和姦淫？

The Challenge 挑戰

It is also amusing that the missionary decided to quote the Prophet (P) and then “conveniently” disparage the late這也是有趣的傳教士決定引用先知（P）和然後“方便”貶低晚 Sheikh Ahmed Deedat謝赫艾哈邁德 Deedat , the doyen of Muslim responses to Christian missionary attacks, of blasphemy.的老前輩穆斯林的反應，基督教傳教士攻擊，褻瀆。 Our response to his allegation is that we challenge this missionary to educate his own children on the evils of fornication by asking them to act out the event live in a play or school drama, word for word as per recorded in Ezekiel 23 .我們的回答對他的指控是， 這位傳教士的挑戰，我們要教育自己的孩子在邪惡淫亂的，要求他們採取行動進行現場直播在播放或學校戲劇，逐字逐句按記錄在以西結書23。 I would be most happy to lend a hand in writing out such a script and will allow to let his own children to be the principal actors in such a play or school drama for Sunday school.我將十分高興地伸出手寫出這樣的腳本，並讓自己的孩子，讓他成為主要演員在此一擊或學校戲劇學校週日。 Certainly, this is not an “outrageous” demand if the missionary himself does not consider this to be “blasphemy” or find any problems with the text of Ezekiel 23.當然，這不是一個“離譜”的要求，如果自己不傳教士認為這是“褻瀆”或發現任何問題與文本以西結 23。 This challenge is also open to his fellow missionaries這個挑戰是他的同胞也開放給傳教士

Until the missionary or his cohorts have the courage to meet our above challenge, we as Muslims will continue to criticise the inappropriate and steamy language of Ezekiel 23 and object to its unnatural imagery.直到傳教士或他的同夥有敢於迎接我們的上述挑戰，我們作為穆斯林將繼續批評不當而潮濕的語言以西結 23，反對它的自然圖像。 Such a passage is most certainly not “inspired” from God Almighty.這樣一段話肯定是不是“靈感”，從全能的上帝。

And only God knows best!只有上帝最清楚！

Acknowledgements 致謝

The author would like to take this opportunity to thank Brother筆者想藉此機會感謝兄弟 Shah Kirit bin Kakulal Govinji沙阿Kirit斌Kakulal Govinji for his input on the Christian missionary response to the Muslim criticism of Ezekiel 23.他的基督教傳教士輸入響應穆斯林批評以西結 23。

Welcome to Bismika Allahuma , your premier source of counter-missionary information from an Islamic perspective!歡迎來到Bismika Allahuma，你的主要來源反傳教士的信息從伊斯蘭的角度！ If you are new here, you may want to get regular updates via如果你是新這裡，您可能想要通過定期更新 RSS feed RSS提要 . 。 Thank you for visiting!謝謝您的來訪！