If you're new here, you may want to get regular updates via如果你是新這裡，你可能想通過定期更新 RSS feed RSS提要 . 。 Thank you for visiting!感謝您訪問！

To find the Christian missionaries要了解基督教傳教士 accusing指責 Muslims of exemplifying lying is totally amusing, to say the least, as the doctrine of taqiyyah is exclusively a Shi'ite doctrine which is held onto by a mere 8% – 10% out of the total 1.3 billion Muslim population around the world, the majority of whom are overwhelmingly Sunni.穆斯林有趣的例證是完全說謊，至少可以說，作為學說taqiyyah完全是一個什葉派學說上舉行了一個只有8％ - 10％的出總人口約為13億穆斯林的世界，大多數人絕大多數是遜尼派。 A refutation of the doctrine of taqiyyah from the Sunni perspective is to be noted反駁的學說taqiyyah來自遜尼派的觀點是值得一提 here這裡 . 。

Moreover there is ample evidence from the而且有足夠證據的 hadith 聖訓 traditions which invariably negates the missionary claims that Islam permits lying . 傳統的總是否定傳教士宣稱，伊斯蘭教允許撒謊 。 ^{1 一} All the missionaries can do to include orthodox Muslims in their allegations is their tendency to quote from The Reliance of the Traveler ( Umdat as-Salik ), an unofficial and sub-standard fiqh manual, specifically geared towards Egyptian society of Sufi persuasion and translated into English by an extremist heterodox Sufi.所有的傳教士可以做，包括正統的穆斯林在他們的指控是他們傾向於引述信賴的旅行者（Umdat為-薩利克 ），是一個非官方和不合標準的律手冊，專門面向埃及社會的蘇菲說服和轉化英國的一個極端主義異端蘇菲。 Sayyid Sabiq's Fiqh as-Sunnah is the authoritative orthodox source covering all four Sunni schools of thought and this work is available賽義德Sabiq的律為，聖行是正統權威的來源包括所有四個遜尼派學校思想工作，這可以用 online在線 .There is no ammunition for the bankrupt missionaries in such orthodox sources, so it is no wonder that they resort to heterodox material. 。沒有彈藥破產傳教士在這種正統的來源，所以難怪他們採取非正統的材料。

Nevertheless, we have decided to play their game, and would like to ask: “What about lying in不過，我們決定發揮他們的遊戲，並希望地問：“怎麼樣躺在 Christianity 基督教 ?” ？“

The answer: it was Paul , the self-confessed “apostle” from Tarsus, who was the first person to rationalise his actions by holding that there was no link between the period in which Jesus (P) had lived and the period in which he himself now lived.答案：這是保羅 ，承認自己“使徒”從大數，誰是第一人，他的行為合理化舉行，有沒有期限之間的聯繫在了耶穌（規劃）曾經生活和他的期間內他現在住。 Times were changing and conditions that prevailed were such that the ethic of Jesus(P) was out of date and could no longer be applied.時代正在發生變化，條件是這樣的，普遍的倫理耶穌（P）是過時的，可以不再適用。 It was with such a view that Paul took stock of the situation which existed then and taught what the Gentiles seem to require him to believe:它是這樣一個觀點，即保了股市存在的情況，然後，教什麼外邦人似乎需要他相信：

“All things are lawful unto me, but I will not be brought under the power of any. ” (1 Corinthians 6:12) “所有的東西都是合法的對我， 但我不會帶來任何的權力下。”（哥林多前書6:12）

During the ministry of Jesus(P), Saul (Paul) was a dedicated member of a powerful, exclusive Jewish sect called Pharisees (Acts 26:5).在耶穌部（規劃），掃羅（保羅）是一個功能強大的專用成員，獨家猶太節稱為法利（使徒26:5）。 Their pretensions to sanctity had labelled them as hypocrites.他們自稱為神聖稱他們為偽君子。 When these overbearing vain-glorious Jews confronted Jesus(P), he called them:當這些傲慢虛榮，面臨著光榮猶太人耶穌（規劃），他稱他們為：

“You are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father you will do. “你是你父親的魔鬼，你們父的私慾你們會做的事。 He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him.他是一個殺人犯從一開始，和居住在沒有真理，沒有真理，因為有他。 When he speaketh a lie he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.” (John 8:44)因他說謊，他是講他自己的：因為他是個騙子，和父親了。“（約翰福音8:44）

Saul, a zealous persecutor of the devoted disciples of Christ, became the first Christian missionary and an apostle to the Gentiles after converting himself to Christianity by a “vision”, which he claims he had, while on the road to Damascus.掃羅，一個熱心的迫害的基督信徒的投入，成為第一個基督教傳教士和外邦人的使徒的基督教後轉換自己由一個“願景”，他聲稱他，而在大馬士革的道路。 The missionary changed his name from Saul to Paul and became the biggest contributor to the Books of the New Testament.傳教士改變了他的名字從掃羅的保羅，成為最大的貢獻者書籍的新約。 From the above verse, Jesus(P) like many of his predecessors condemned lying, deceit and hypocrisy.從上面的經文，耶穌（P）的前任一樣，他的很多譴責說謊，欺騙和偽善。 Lying is condemned several times throughout the Bible, and deceit by its own nature, is sinful and can only lead to hazardous consequences.說謊是多次譴責整個聖經，並欺騙了自己的性質，是有罪的，只能導致危險的後果。 What does Peter say in regards to guile彼得說的是什麼狡猾的問候 ^{2 2} ? ？

“For he that will love life, and see good days, let him refrain his tongue from evil, and his lips that speak no guile.” (1 Peter 3:12) “對於他將熱愛生活，看看好日子，讓他不要他的舌頭從邪惡的，他的嘴唇說話沒有詭詐的。”（1彼得3:12）

The verse speaks for itself.詩言自明的。 One of the factors that hinder man's success in this world and eternal life in the hereafter, is the use of guile.其中一個因素，阻礙人的成功在這個世界上，永恆的生命，此後，是用詭計。 But on his own admittance, what does Paul say?但在他自己的入場，保羅說什麼？

“But be it so, I did not burden you: nevertheless being crafty, I caught you with guile. ” (2 Corinthians 12:16) “但是無論是這樣，我沒有包袱你： 不過是狡猾的，我看見你的詭計。”（林後12:16）

On his own admission, Paul is saying that he uses deception in his modus operandi . 在他自己承認，保羅說，他用在他的欺騙手法 。 In all the new versions of the Bible, the more common term of “deceit” is replaced instead . 在所有的新版本的聖經，更常見的術語“欺騙”而被替換 。 This statement is made long after his conversion to Christianity, in the phase when he supposed to be blessed and righteous, and most importantly of all, being guided by Christ.這項聲明是在很久後，他改信基督教，在相當他應該是祝福和正義，最重要的是，基督為指導。 Paul was not only a rejector of the Mosaic Law and the Jesus Ethic, he also asserted that he was a law unto himself.保羅不僅是排異的鑲嵌法和耶穌的倫理，他還聲稱，他是你們自己的法律。 Many people, obviously, could not accept this.很多人，顯然，不能接受的。 Thus Paul responded with:因此，保羅與回應：

“For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto His Glory; why yet I am also judged a sinner? ” (Romans 3:7-8)他說：“如果神的真理更比比皆是，通過我的謊言他的榮耀， 為什麼我還沒有判斷一個罪人？”（羅馬書3:7-8）

It can be ascertained from this statement that although Paul knew that he was lying, he felt that the means justified the end, but it was not understand how truth would abound through a lie.它可確定從保羅這句話，雖然知道他在撒謊，他認為，合理的手段結束，但它不明白真相將盛產通過一個謊言。 According to this reasoning, if the man Jesus was equated with God, then what objections could a follower of Jesus have?根據這一推理，如果該名男子耶穌等同於上帝，那麼反對可能追隨耶穌呢？

Guile is certainly deception.吉爾當然是欺騙。 Flattery is simply rather shameful.奉承是簡單而可恥的。 And they lend themselves nicely to each other.而他們自己很好地借給對方。 But, deception (especially for the sake of proselytizing) was started by Paul and became the raison d'etre of those who laid the foundation of the European church.但是，欺騙（尤其是為了從事傳教活動）是由保羅開始，成為其存在的理由對那些誰奠定了基礎，歐洲的教堂。 And the missionaries of today seem to have no qualms in utilizing it.而傳教士今天似乎沒有疑慮在利用它。 Deception is the name of the game, and this is obvious when the missionaries start substituting exclusively Muslim phrases such as insha'allah (God willing) for “Lord Jesus willing”, subhana Allah (Praise God) with “Praise Lord Jesus”, “Wa Allahu a'lam” (God knows best) with “Jesus knows best”, ie in欺騙是名稱的遊戲，這是明顯的，當傳教士開始完全取代穆斯林詞組，如insha'allah（上帝願意）為“主耶穌願意”，subhana安拉 （讚美上帝）與“讚美主耶穌”，“華真主a'lam“（上帝最清楚）與”耶穌最清楚“，即在 their articles他們的文章 which openly berates Islam.其中公開斥責伊斯蘭教。 Another attempt at guile is the Christian missionary在狡猾的另一個企圖是基督教傳教士 activity of “church-planting”活動的“教會種植” in Muslim nations where they openly state their desire to convert Muslims “by hook or by crook”.在穆斯林國家，他們公開聲明他們的願望，就是將穆斯林“不擇手段”。

Perhaps the missionaries in their “pick-and-choose” religion had suffered from amnesia and forgotten the following:也許在他們的傳教士“挑選和選擇”宗教遭受了失憶症，忘記了以下內容：

“Blessed is the man unto whom the LORD imputeth not iniquity, and in whose spirit there is no guile.” (Psalms 32:2) “你們是有福的人不是他是耶和華神算罪孽，並在其精神也沒有詭詐的。”（詩篇 32:2）

And only God knows best!而且，只有上帝知道最好的！

1. The Prophet先知 Muhammad穆罕默德 is quoted to have said: “Let he who truly believes in Allah and the Last Day speak good or be silent.” ( Sahih al-Bukhari ).有引述說：“讓他誰真正相信真主和末日講好或保持沉默。”（ 的詞句基地布哈里 ）。 Moreover, he has specifically cursed the person who lies to make people laugh, he said: “Woe be on one who speaks and lies in order to make people laugh, woe be on him.” (Abu Dawud).此外，他已明確詛咒的人誰是讓大家笑，他說：“禍是誰在發言和謊言之一，為了讓人們歡笑，共命運是他。”（艾布達烏德）。 See also the traditions in Abu Dawud (5004)/ Musnad Ahmad and Sahih al-Bukhari (vol. 8, no 118).另見傳統，艾布達烏德（5004）/ Musnad艾哈邁德的詞句和基地布哈里 （第一卷8，沒有118）。 [ [ back背面 ] ]
2. The Greek word is “dolos”, which means “bait” or “snare”, “deceit is rendered” (WE Vine, Vine's Expository Dictionary of Old & New Testament Words , Thomas Nelson Publishers (1997), under the word 'GUILE', p. 515).希臘字是“dolos”，意為“誘餌”或“陷阱”，“欺騙呈現”（我們藤， 藤的說明文詞典的舊與新約詞 ，托馬斯納爾遜出版（1997年），在這個詞'桂樂牌' ，第515頁）。 See also Strong's #1388 which defines dolos as “craft, deceit, guile, subtility” (p. 34) [又見強的定義 dolos＃1388“工藝，欺騙，狡詐，subtility”（第34頁）[ back背面 ] ]