If you're new here, you may want to get regular updates via如果你是新这里，你可能想通过定期更新 RSS feed RSS提要 . 。 Thank you for visiting!谢谢您的访问！
Before 1881, all translations of the New Testament (including, most importantly, the 1611 King James Version (KJV), also known as the Authorised Version (AV)), were based on copies of Greek manuscripts known as the Textus Receptus, which is Latin for Received Text. 1881年之前，所有的新约（包括翻译，最重要的是，1611年国王詹姆斯版本（KJV），也被称为授权版（影音）），都是在作为Web网站receptus，这是已知的希腊手稿副本拉丁语收到的文字。 (Abbreviated to TR). （简称章）。
But in the 19th and 20th centuries, older Greek manuscripts were discovered.但在19世纪和20世纪，老希腊手稿被发现。 These manuscripts have caused造成这些手稿 Bible圣经 scholars to revise what they believe is the correct text of the New Testament.学者修改了他们认为是正确的新约文本。 The latest revision of this Greek Text is the United Bible Societies' 'The Greek New Testament' (published by United Bible Societies, 4th Edition, 1993); (which I will abbreviate as UBS4).这个最新版本的希腊文本是联合圣经公会'希腊新约'（由联合圣经公会，第4版，1993年出版）;（我会简称为UBS4）。 The successive revisions of the UBS New Testament are widely accepted in the field of Biblical Studies, and have been used for modern translations such as the Revised Standard Version (RSV), New International Version (NIV) and New Revised Standard Version (NRSV).瑞银的新约是广为接受的圣经研究领域相继修订，并已翻译，如现代所用的标准修订版（RSV）的，新国际版（为证）和新修订标准版（NRSV）。
The UBS4 differs from the Received Text at thousands of points.在不同的UBS4数千点接收到的文本。 In other words, the consensus of Bible Scholars is that, for at least a thousand years, the Christian church was using a Greek New Testament text which contained thousands of errors.换言之，圣经学者的共识是，至少在1000年，基督教教会使用的是希腊文新约文本中的错误数千人。
This raises the question: how significant are these differences?这就提出了一个问题：如何重要的是这些分歧？ Was the church, until 1881, misled by deficient Bibles?是教堂，直到1881年，由缺乏圣经误导？ Or were the differences minor and insignificant?或者是轻微的和微不足道的差异？
The aim is (in principle) to list ALL the differences between UBS4 and the Received Text, and demonstrate that the Bible has too many textual variants to just simply ignore.这样做的目的是（原则），以之间的所有UBS4名单和收到的文字差异，证明圣经有太多的文字变体只是简单地忽略。
A short list is reproduced below.一个简短的清单转载如下。 Bear in mind that these ones ARE the most important differences.请记住，这些是最重要的区别。 The vast majority of the others are very small matters of spelling or word order.对其他绝大多数是拼写或语序非常小的问题。
You will notice that the majority (of the large differences listed here) are assimilations between the gospels.你会发现这里所列出的巨大差异，大部分（）之间的福音同化。 In other words scribes, apparently disturbed by the differences between the gospels, added (“assimilated”) text to make it match another gospel(s).在文士换句话说，显然不安福音之间的差异，添加（“同化”）文本，使其符合另一个福音（第）。 Such changes cannot be simply ignored.这种变化不能简单地忽略。
Most differences can be seen by comparing the KJV with a modern translation such as the RSV, NRSV or NIV (but not the NKJV, which is mainly just an updating of the language of the KJV).大多数差异可以看到一个比较，如呼吸道合胞病毒，NRSV或为证（但不是NKJV，主要是仅仅是对新译语言翻译更新现代节）。
Format 格式
- Verse in bold诗大胆
- Description of difference (in brackets and in italics).括号内的说明差异和斜体（）。 UBS4 is the modern Greek New Testament; TR is the Greek used for the (1611) King James Version. UBS4是现代希腊文新约，TR是用于希腊（1611年）国王詹姆斯版本。
- Explain the difference in normal font.说明在正常字体的差异。
The List 该清单
Matt. 马特。 5:22 (UBS4 omits 'without cause') 5:22（UBS4遗漏导致'没有'）
Matt 6:13 (UBS4 omits 'For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever'). 马特6:13（UBS4 遗漏'，是为了你的国度，权柄，荣耀，永远'）。
Matt 12:47 (UBS4 omits entire verse) - assimilated from Mark 9:32 马特12:47（UBS4 忽略整个诗） -同化马克9:32
Matt 17:21 (UBS4 omits entire verse) – assimilated from Mark 9:29 马特17:21（UBS4 忽略整个诗） -同化马克9:29
Matt 18:11 (UBS4 omits entire verse) – assimilated from Luke 19:10 马特18:11（UBS4 忽略整个诗） -从同化卢克19:10
Matt. 马特。 21:7 – (some manuscripts changed 'them' to 'him', because a scribe thought it was odd that 21时07分 - （他'一些手稿改变'他们'到'，因为文士认为这是奇怪的是， Jesus 耶稣 would sit on two donkeys). 坐在两个驴）。
Matt 21:44 (UBS4 omits entire verse) – assimilated from Luke 20:18. 马特21:44（UBS4忽略整个诗） -从路加福音20:18同化。
Matt 23:14 (UBS4 omits entire verse) – assimilated from Mark 12:20 and Luke 20:47 马特23:14（UBS4忽略整个诗） - 20:47同化马克，路加12:20
Matt 27:35 (UBS4 omits entire verse) – assimilated from John 19:24. 马特27:35（UBS4忽略整个诗） -同化约翰19:24。
Mark 1:1 ('Son of God' is not be original, although UBS4 decides it probably is original.). 马克1:1（'上帝的儿子'是不是原来的，虽然UBS4决定它很可能就是原始的。）。
Mark 6:11 (UBS omits second sentence): assimilated from Matthew 10:15 马克6:11（瑞银省略第二句）：吸收来自马修10:15
Mark 7:16 (UBS4 omits entire verse) – copied from Mark 4:9 or 4:23 马克7:16（UBS4忽略整个诗） -复制从马克4:9或4:23
Mark 9:44 (UBS4 omits entire verse) – copied from Mark 9:48 马克9:44（UBS4忽略整个诗） -复制从马克9:48
Mark 9:46 (UBS4 omits entire verse) – copied from Mark 9:48 马克9:46（UBS4忽略整个诗） -复制从马克9:48
Mark 11:26 (UBS4 omits entire verse) – assimilated from Matt 6:15 马克11:26（UBS4忽略整个诗） -吸收来自马特6:15
Mark 15:28 (UBS4 omits entire verse) – assimilated from Luke 22:37 马克15:28（UBS4忽略整个诗） -从同化卢克22:37
Mark 16:9-20 (UBS4 omits all 12 verses) – assimilated from numerous sources in Matthew, Luke, John and Acts. 马克16:9-20（UBS4省略了所有12个章节） -使徒约翰和吸收来自众多来源的马太，路加，。 For more detail see详见 The Text of Mark 16 16文本的标志 . 。
Luke 4:44 (UBS4: 'Synagogues of Judea'; TR: 'Synagogues of Galilee') 路加福音4:44（UBS4：'犹太会堂';章：'加利利会堂的'）
Luke 9:55-56 (UBS4 omits entire verse) – assimilated from Luke 19:10 路加福音9:55-56（UBS4忽略整个诗） -从同化卢克19:10
Luke 11:2-4 (TR is similar to Lord's Prayer in Matthew 6:9-13; UBS4 has it much shorter) 路加福音11:2-4（TR是类似于主祷文马太6:9-13; UBS4有没有更短）
Luke 17:36 (UBS4 omits entire verse) – assimilated from Matt 24:40 路加福音17:36（UBS4忽略整个诗） -吸收来自马特24:40
Luke 22:43-44 (UBS4 omits these two verses [A]) 路加福音22:43-44（UBS4忽略这两个诗句[甲]）
Luke 23:17 (UBS4 omits entire verse) – assimilated from Matt 27:15, Mark 15:6 路加福音23:17（UBS4忽略整个诗） -吸收来自马特27:15，马可福音15:6
Luke 23:34 (UBS4 omits words of Jesus) 路加福音23:34（UBS4忽略耶稣的话）
Luke 24:5 (some manuscripts lack the words 'He is not here but has risen'; UBS4 says the words probably ARE original) 路加福音24:5（缺乏一些手稿的话'他不在这里，但已上升'; UBS4说的话大概是原件）
Luke 24:12 (Peter finding the empty tomb of Jesus – some manuscripts omit; UBS4 includes) 路加福音24:12（彼得发现了耶稣的空墓-一些手稿省略; UBS4包括）
Luke 24:51 (ascension of Jesus – some manuscripts omit; UBS4 includes)) 路加福音24:51（耶稣升天-一些手稿省略; UBS4包括））
John 3:16 ('begotten') 约翰3:16（'造物主'）
John 5:4 (UBS4 omits) 约翰5:4（UBS4省略）
John 7:53-8:11 (the woman found in adultery – UBS4 omits entire passage) 约翰7:53-8:11（女子发现通奸- UBS4忽略整个文章）
John 21:25 (there is manuscript evidence that this verse was not original). 约翰21:25（手稿有证据表明，这不是原来的诗句）。
Acts 8:37 (UBS4 omits verse) 行为8:37（UBS4省略诗）
Acts 15:34 (UBS4 omits verse) 使徒15时34（UBS4省略诗）
Acts 24:7 (UBS4 omits verse) 行为24:7（UBS4省略诗）
Acts 28:29 (UBS4 omits verse) 行为28:29（UBS4省略诗）
Romans 16:24 (UBS4 omits verse) – copied from Romans 16:20 罗马书16:24（UBS4忽略诗） - 16:20从罗马复制
1 Timothy 3:16 (UBS4: 'which was manifest in the flesh'; TR: 'God was manifest in the flesh') 提摩太前书3:16（UBS4：'这是'在肉身显现;章：'上帝是血肉关系体现在'）
1 John 5:7 (The 'Johainne Comma' – UBS4 omits): 1 John 5:7 has long been known not to be original. 约翰一书5:7（在'Johainne逗号' - UBS4省略）：约翰一书5:7早已知道它不是原来的。 It was never in the Greek manuscripts (the original language of the New Testament), but surfaced in the LATIN translation in the fifth century, AFTER the Trinity doctrine had been accepted!这是从来没有在希腊手稿（即原来的新约圣经的语言），但在第五世纪拉丁美洲翻译浮出水面后，三位一体学说已经被接受！ It appears that a 'gloss' (a marginal comment in a Bible) accidentally found its way into the Latin Bible.看来，一个'光泽'（圣经中的一个边缘的评论）意外地进入了拉丁圣经的方式。 Due to some “unfortunate” politics, Erasmus (who compared various manuscripts in the 16th century to select what he thought was the best Greek text) included the verse against his better judgement.由于一些“不幸的”政治，伊拉斯谟（谁比较，16世纪的各种手稿，选择他认为是最好的希腊文）包括对他的判断的诗句。 From there it found its way into the King James Version (which was based on Erasmus' text).从那里进入了国王詹姆斯版本的方式（这是在伊拉斯谟'文本为准）。
One Response for一反应 "On The Integrity of the Bible" “关于圣经的完整性”
The Bible does not contain self-reference, that is, the word 'Bible' is not in the Bible.圣经不包含自我参照，即，这个词'圣经'是不是圣经。 Nowhere does the Bible talk about itself.没有任何一个地方对自身圣经讲座。 Some scriptures are sometimes pointed to in the Bible, say: Here where it talks about itself, but we have to look closely.有时一些经文指出，在圣经中，说：这里的地方有关它自身的谈判，但我们必须密切关注。 2nd Timothy 3:16 is the favourite which reads: “All scripture is inspired of God” and there are those who would say, here is where the Bible it talks about itself, it says it is inspired of God, all of it.第二提摩太3:16是最喜欢的内容如下：“圣经都是神的启发”，并有那些谁就会说，这里就是圣经它本身有关谈判，它说，这是上帝的灵感，这一切。 But if you read the whole sentence, you read that this was a letter wrote by Paul to Timothy and the entire sentence says to Timothy: “Since you were a young man you have studied the holy scriptures, all scriptures inspired by God” and so on… When Timothy was a young man the New Testament did not exist, the only thing that stems he was talking about are scriptures – which are only a portion of the Bible – from before that time.但如果你读了整个句子的，你看，这是一个信中写道：由保罗提摩太和整个句子提摩太说：“既然你是一个年轻的人，你已经研究了神圣的经文，经文都源于上帝”，等等就...当提摩太是一个年轻人的新约不存在，唯一源于他所说的那些经典 - 这仅是从圣经的部分在此之前 - 。 It could not have meant the whole Bible.它不能意味着整个圣经。
Bible Curses Church Fathers Who REMOVED Book of Revelations圣经诅咒教会的父亲是谁删除的启示录
There is at the end of the Bible a verse which says:目前在该节结束圣经说：
Rev 22:18 “For I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book (Revelations): if anyone adds to these things, God will add to him the plagues that are written in this book:冯22:18“我可以证明大家谁听见了这本书（启示录）预言的话：如果有人增加了这些事，神会加重他认为在这书上的灾祸：
19. 19。 And if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, god shall take away his part from the Book of Life, from the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.而若有人远离了这一预言书上的话，神应远离他的生命之书的一部分，从神圣的城市，这是从在这书上的东西。 [Y. [士元 Estes]埃斯蒂斯]
“Let anyone who takes away from this book or adds to this book be cursed”. “允许任何人谁需要远离这本书或增加了这本书被诅咒”。 This to is sometimes pointed to me saying: Here is where it sums itself as a whole.这有时是指对我说：这里是它本身作为一个整体款项。 But look again and you will see that when it says: Let no one change this book, it is talking about that last book, #66 (or is it #73 in the Catholic Bible?), the Book of Revelation.但是，再看看，你会看到，当它说：让任何人改变这本书，它所指的是最后一本书，＃66（或者是在天主教圣经＃73？），这本书的启示。 It has too, because any reference will tell you that the Book of Revelation was written before certain other parts of the Bible were written.它有太多，因为任何引用将告诉你，以前的启示录，圣经写的某些其他部分被写入。 It happens today to be stacked at the end, but there are other parts that came after, so it can not be referring to the entire book.它发生在今天结束堆叠，但也有认为是继其他地区，因此它不能是指整本图书。
(Incidentally, according to different manuscripts much older than the King James Version, there are different words at the end of the Book of Revelation, so how would we resolve that matter? – YE) （顺便说一句，根据不同的手稿比国王詹姆斯版本以上，有在启示录底不同的字，因此，我们如何才能解决这个问题？ - 叶）
Note: The Book of Revelation was taken out of the Bible several times and then replaced and then taken out and replaced according to various Church Councils throughout Church history.注：启示录完全是出于圣经几次，然后更换，然后取出，代之以根据不同的教会议会在整个教会的历史。 Guess the Church Fathers didn't read the curse at the end of the book?竞猜教父没有看过在书末的诅咒？