If you're new here, you may want to get regular updates via如果你是新这里，你可能想通过定期更新 RSS feed RSS提要 . 。 Thank you for visiting!谢谢您的访问！

The following extract has been taken from the following review of Luxenberg's book:以下摘录已采取从拉克森伯格的书审查以下内容：

Reviewer: Simon Hopkins. 评论者：西蒙霍普金斯。
Published in: JSAI , Vol. 发表于：JSAI，卷。 28 (2003), pp. 28（2003），页。 377-380 377-380

It reinforces the claim I have been making for ages that the real problem is not in Luxenberg's interpretation of this or that term, so that a clever selection from his book would enable us to arrive at an all-correct set of Luxenberg's Qur'anic interpretations.它强化了时代要求，我一直做好， 真正的问题不在拉克森伯格的这一解释，或者任期内，使一个聪明的选择从他的书使我们能够达成一项拉克森伯格的古兰经interpretations 全正确的设置。 Instead, the real problem lies in his fundamental hypothesis and at the very root of his stance.相反， 真正的问题在于他的基本假设，并在他的立场非常根。 Consequently, this false start renders erroneous even those secondary conclusions of his, which otherwise stand in harmony with the researches of the mainstream Qur'anic scholars.因此，这个假开始呈现错误甚至是他的，否则在和谐的立场与主流古兰经学者研究中学的结论。

In other words, his entire book is an erroneous outcome of a false hypothesis.换句话说，他的整本书是一个虚假的假设错误的结果1。

Now, the extract of Simon Hopkins:现在，提取西蒙霍普金斯：

“Quite apart from the wayward philology and exegetical caprice exemplified above [see pp. “除了文字学和训诂学的任性任性例证见上文[不少页。 378, 379] , the book makes no attempt to place its findings in any plausible historical context. 378，379]，这本书并没有试图把它的历史背景中任何可能的结果。 Who were the Christian inhabitants of the pre-Islamic Mecca who used the alleged Qur'anic “aramaisch-arabische Mischsprache” [ie, Aramaic-Arabic mixed language] , and what exactly were their Syriac writings which are supposed to have produced the Arabic Qur'an.谁是阿拉伯文古兰经基督教居民的前伊斯兰圣地谁使用了据称古兰经“aramaisch - arabische Mischsprache”[即，阿拉姆语，阿拉伯语混合语言]，究竟产生了什么著作，这是他们的叙利亚应该有'一。 How does the theory account for the Jewish elements in Muslim scripture, and how did the early Islamic exegetes manage to achieve so thoroughly a misunderstanding -? [something which Luxenberg claims on the p.如何在穆斯林，犹太圣经的内容理论解释，以及如何做了早期的伊斯兰exegetes的管理，以便实现彻底的误解- ？[什么是拉克森伯格页的索赔 83 of his book] — of their holy book? 他的著作83] -他们的圣书？ Indeed, how did they come to have such a holy book — [meaning a book with such alleged "mixed-language"] — at all?事实上，他们怎么来有这样的圣书- [书上的含义与所谓的“混合语”] -在所有？ One will readily concede that the text of the Qur'an is fraught with problems.人会轻易承认的是，古兰经文字，却是千疮百孔。 It is difficult, however, to believe that many (or indeed any) of them have been solved by Mr Luxenberg's book.” (p. 380).这是困难的，但是，相信很多（或任何），其中已经解决拉克森伯格先生的书。“（第380页）。

Read the offprint 阅读单行本 [in .pdf format, requires Adobe Acrobat Reader]在[。pdf格式，需要Adobe Acrobat Reader]