Sources of the Qur'an: Question for the Critics古蘭經來源：問題的批評
Introduction 簡介
It is known that the enemies of據了解，在敵人 Islam伊斯蘭教 , most especially the Christian missionaries, are unable to accept the reality of the Qur'an and its divine existence. ，最特別的基督教傳教士，無法接受現實的古蘭經和它的神聖的存在。 Hence, they try to make excuses and their frequent clarion of despair is that the Qur'an was “plagiarised” from Judeo-Christian sources.因此，他們試圖為自己找藉口和頻繁號角絕望的是，古蘭經是“抄襲”的猶太教和基督教的來源。 This claim was repeated by Orientalists in the likes of Sale這項索賠是重複了在贊東方銷售 1 一 , Bell貝爾 2 2 and Rodinson和羅丁森 3 三 . 。 Needless to mention, these rabble did not provide any proof for these accusations.更不用說，這些烏合之眾沒有提供任何證據對這些指控。 Their claims, however, are happily picked up by the Christian missionaries who are still living in the past.他們的說法，但是，愉快地回升，由基督教傳教士誰仍然生活在過去。
Questions for the Critics 問題的批評
The following questions are adapted from下列問題是改編自 Muhammad穆罕默德 Shabri Abd Madjid's Orientalis Barat Iri Hati Kebesaran Al-Quran Shabri阿卜杜勒Madjid的山東教育巴拉裡裡Hati Kebesaran鋁古蘭經 4 4 For the benefit of our readers who do not habitually read the Malay language, we have hence loosely translated the relevant portion of this article:對於我們的讀者受益誰不經常讀馬來文，我們都因而鬆散翻譯了這篇文章的相關部分：
Looking at the personality and the background of the life of Muhammad (P) from childhood until his death, it is easy to refute these baseless and illogical allegations with logical reasoning ( dalil aqli ) as follows:縱觀個性和背景的生命穆罕默德（規劃）從童年，直到他去世，很容易反駁這些指控毫無根據和不符合邏輯與邏輯推理（dalil aqli）如下：
Firstly, Muhammad (P) was known to be a truthful person ( al-Amin ) and this is acknowledged by both his friends and enemies.首先，穆罕默德（P）為稱為是一個誠實的人（ 鋁阿敏 ），這是既承認他的朋友和敵人。 Therefore it is impossible for him to lie or to be untruthful about his relevations.因此，這是不可能的，他不實謊言或將要對他relevations。
Secondly, if it were true that Muhammad (P) was not honest and sincere in conveying his message, why did his closest friends and ardent followers obey him, much less adhere to his teachings, in the face of such opposition and difficulty during the earlier stages of his mission?第二，如果是真的，穆罕默德（P）為不老實和真誠傳達他的訊息，為什麼他最親密的朋友和他的追隨者服從，更堅持他的教誨，在面對這種反對和困難在前面階段，他的使命？
Thirdly, if it is true that Muhammad (P) had formed his own relevations from some Jewish or Christian teacher(s), then why is the name of that teacher(s) not mentioned in第三，如果這是真的，穆罕默德（規劃）已形成了自己的relevations一些猶太人或基督徒教師（S），則為何該名教師（們）沒有提及 history歷史 and known to all?和已知的呢？
Fourthly, the Jews and Christians referred to as the 'People of the Book' by the Qur'an vehemently opposed, ridiculed and openly insulted Muhammad(P).第四，猶太人和基督徒被稱為'以人的書'的強烈反對古蘭經，嘲笑和公開侮辱穆罕默德（P）功能。 They hid the knowledge contained within their scripture from Muhammad.他們躲在自己的知識包含在聖經的穆罕默德。 How is it possible that at the same time, they were teaching Muhammad (P) their scripture?這怎麼可能在同一時間，他們的教學穆罕默德（規劃）的聖經？
Lastly, Muhammad(P) was an illiterate, and hence how was he able to write a complete Book (al-Quran)?最後，穆罕默德（P）是一個文盲，因此他怎麼能寫一個完整的書（鋁古蘭經）？
Conclusion 結論
It can be seen that to claim that the Qur'an was composed by a single Arab nomad, in this case Muhammad (P), who decided one day to reform his people's long-held pagan idol worshipping and other practices, is a theory that is, amusing as it may be, fabulous in its absurdity and does not stand up to the scrutiny.可以看出，聲稱古蘭經組成由一個阿拉伯游牧民族，在這種情況下，穆罕默德（P）的，誰決定一天他的人民，改革的長期持有的異教偶像崇拜和其他做法，是一種理論，即是因為它可能是有趣，精彩在其荒謬，不站起來的監督。
And only God knows best.只有上帝最清楚。
Welcome to Bismika Allahuma , your premier source of counter-missionary information from an Islamic perspective!歡迎來到Bismika Allahuma，你的主要來源反傳教士的信息從伊斯蘭的角度！ If you are new here, you may want to get regular updates via如果你是新這裡，您可能想要通過定期更新 RSS feed RSS提要 . 。 Thank you for visiting!謝謝您的來訪！
- George Sale, Preliminary Discourse (1899) [喬治銷售， 初步話語 （1899）[ back回 ] ]
- Richard Bell, The Origin Of Islam and Its Christian Environment (1926) [理查德貝爾， 伊斯蘭教的起源與基督教環境 （1926）[ back回 ] ]
- M. Rodinson, Mohammad (1977) [米羅丁森， 穆罕默德 （1977）[ back回 ] ]
- The online document of this text may be found在線文檔中可以找到這個文本 here這裡 . 。 [ [ back回 ] ]
One Response for 一個響應 "Sources of the Qur'an: Question for the Critics" “古蘭經來源：問題的批評”
The most important prove is that the last prophet was unlearned how can it is possible for him to write such a miraculous book which is in complete accordence with modern day science.最重要的證明是最後的先知是胸無點墨又怎能有可能為他寫這樣一個神奇的書，是完全與現代科學 accordence。