If you're new here, you may want to get regular updates via如果你是新這裡，你可能想通過定期更新 RSS feed RSS提要 . 。 Thank you for visiting!感謝您訪問！

Various numerical contradictions can be seen between the verses contained within the Old Testament.各數值之間的矛盾可以看到的詩句包含在舊約。 We note the following numerical discrepencies, as follows:我們注意到下面的數值 discrepencies，如下：

• II Chronicles 36:9 says that Jehoiachin was 8 years old when he became king.歷代志下36:9說，約雅斤是8歲的時候，他成為國王。 II Kings 24:8 says Jehoiachin was 18 years old when he became king. 24:8說，二國王約雅斤是18歲的時候，他成為國王。
• II Samuel 10:18 talks about David slew the men of 700 chariots of the Syrians and 40,000 horsemen and Shobach the commander.二塞繆爾 10:18談大衛殺死了男子700戰車的敘利亞人和40000騎兵和Shobach的指揮官。 But I Chronicles 1:18 says that David slew the men of 7000 chariots and 40,000 footmen但我方志1:18說，大衛殺死了7000人的步兵戰車和40000
• In 1 Kings 7:26, the sea in Solomon's temple had a volume of 2,000 baths but in 2 Chronicles 4:5, the same sea had a much larger volume of 3,000 baths.在列王紀上7:26，海在所羅門聖殿有一個量的2,000洗澡，但在歷代志下4:5，同樣的大海具有大得多的容量為 3000洗澡。
• In I Kings 9: 27-28, we are told that Hiram sent four hundred and twenty talents of gold to King Solomon, but yet 2 Chronicles 8:18 informs us that King Solomon received four hundred and fifty talents of gold from Hiram.在王9：27至28日，我們被告知，希蘭打發 420人才所羅門王的黃金，但尚未歷代誌下 8:18告訴我們，所羅門王收到450人才黃金從西貢。
• I Chronicles 9:25 says that Solomon had 4000 stalls for horses and chariots.我方志9:25說，所羅門有4000個攤位，馬匹和戰車。 I Kings 4:26 says that he had 40,000 stalls for horses, only.我國王 4:26說，他已為 40000攤位馬，只。
• Ezra 2:5 talks about an exile Arah having 775 sons.以斯拉記 2:5亞拉談流亡者有775名兒子。 Nehemiah 7:10 talks about the same exiled Arah having 652 sons.尼希米7:10談到了同樣的流亡亞拉有652兒子。
• In Ezra 2:8, the number of Zattu's children that returned from Babylon was nine hundred and forty and five, yet in Nehemiah 7:13, only eight hundred and forty-five retuned from Babylon.在以斯拉2:8，其數量 Zattu的孩子，返回從巴比倫 940和5，但在尼希米7:13，只有845重新調校從巴比倫。

The strongest “defence” that the missionaries have put forward for these numerous discrepencies in the numbers is that all these errors are all due to “scribal errors” or that all these errors are “insignificant” to Christian doctrine.最強大的“防禦”的傳教士們提出了許多 discrepencies在這些數字是，所有這些錯誤都是由於“抄寫錯誤”，或所有這些錯誤是“微不足道”的基督教教義。 But obviously, as we have outlined in the methodology, arguments along these lines are problematic.但很明顯，正如我們所概述的方法，沿著這些線路參數有問題。 After all, if God is indeed the author of the畢竟，如果確實是神的作者 Bible聖經 , giving “divine inspiration” to the scribes who wrote the Bible, would He be so incompetant and careless to have overlooked the numerical discrepencies and concentrates on doctrine, only ? ，讓“神的靈感”的文士誰寫的聖經，他會如此不稱職，不小心被忽略了的數值discrepencies和集中於理論， 只有 ？