If you're new here, you may want to get regular updates via如果你是新這裡,你可能想通過定期更新 RSS feed RSS提要 . 。 Thank you for visiting!感謝您訪問!
From the beginning of Orientalism, the Christian missionaries have been assuming that Islam is “headless” enough to be attacked and scrutinized with a ferocity that one can only conclude borders on fanaticism.從一開始的東方學,基督教傳教士已經假定,伊斯蘭教是“無頭”足以受到攻擊,並審議了兇猛只能得出一個結論,一個狂熱的邊界上。 These missionaries proved then that they do not have the brains to acknowledge their own headlessness.這些傳教士證明這時,他們的大腦沒有承認自己的無核心。 One such example is其中一個例子是 David Wood大衛伍德 , a recent zealous recruit by the ever-intolerent Answering Islam , whose only amazing ability is his extreme belligerence, and what can only be described as fanatical intolerence, towards a faith different from his. ,最近聘請了熱心的不斷intolerent 回答伊斯蘭教 ,他們的唯一驚人的能力是他極端好戰,什麼只能說是狂熱的耐力,對他的信仰不同。 This is a review of one such這是一個這樣的檢討 article文章 . 。
Mr. Wood begins by saying:伍德先生首先說:
We are sure that it has been such “a very large secret” that the incidents “exposed” in Mr. Wood's belligerent piece were actually recorded in some recent contemporary biographies of the Prophet Muhammad (P).我們相信,它已被這樣的“一個非常大的秘密”,該事件“暴露”在伍德先生的交戰記錄片,實際上在最近的一些當代傳記的先知穆罕默德(規劃)。 Mr. Wood should consider reading the late Martin Ling's “伍德先生應考慮讀已故馬丁靈的“ Muhammad: His Life Based on the Earliest Sources 穆罕默德:他的生活的基礎上,最早的來源 “, MH Haykal's “ “先生,MH Haykal的” The Life of Muhammad 穆罕默德的生命 ” and another book, “ The Sealed Nectar ” and see whether these eminent writers have concealed even a fraction of the Prophet's (P) life. “和一本新書,” 密封蜜源 “,看看是否這些傑出的作家,隱匿甚至一小部分的先知(規劃)的生活。
Yet Mr. Wood continue to persist in this mindless bigotry, and says:但伍德先生繼續堅持這種不用動腦筋的偏見,並說:
One should not throw stones at glass houses, and similarly one could say the following for the Judeo-Christian faith:人們不應在玻璃房子裡扔石頭,同樣可以說下面的猶太教和基督教的信仰:
Mr. Wood has not proven anything apart from an assertion that, in his view, what the Prophet (P) did was “robbing and murdering”.伍德先生還沒有證明任何東西,除了一個斷言,在他看來,什麼先知(規劃)所做的“搶劫殺人”。
The following are some of the claims that he has charged against the Prophet (P).以下是一些聲稱,他已記入先知(規劃)。 Do note the nature of the polemical trend employed by Mr Wood.是否注意到性質的論戰趨勢受僱於伍德先生。 They are neither “new” nor have they not been discussed or answered aeons ago.他們既不是“新”也沒有,他們沒有討論或回答aeons前。 What we will do here is to reproduce some of the charges, and provide a link to a further discussion on the issue.我們將在這裡做什麼是複製一些費用,並提供一個鏈接到進一步討論這個問題。 This is to demonstrate to Mr. Wood and his missionary pals that their tired, old repetitions are not unfamiliar to us, and to send a message that we are not interested in reinventing the wheel and waste our time in responding .這是為了證明伍德先生和他的夥伴們,他們的傳教累了,老重複都不會陌生,並發送一條消息, 我們不感興趣的重複勞動和浪費我們的時間響應 。
The following are some of the claims that were made.以下是一些聲稱作了。
Claim #1: When Muhammad began receiving his revelations, his first impression was that he was possessed by demons 索賠#1:當穆罕默德開始接受他的啟示,他的第一印象是,他是魔鬼附體
This was discussed by Al-Nowaihi, who這是討論由Al - Nowaihi,誰 notes筆記 that:說:
It is important to realize that when that search culminated in his hearing the voice of Gabriel in Mount Hira, at the age of forty, he did not hasten to believe in his revelation or become convinced of it overnight.重要的是要認識到,該搜索時,他終於在聽到聲音的加布里埃爾希拉山,在年齡 40,他並不急於相信在他的啟示或在一夜之間成為信服。 He passed through a period of considerable doubt and fear, terrified lest it be only the wicked trick and cruel jesting of Satan, and he needed the wholehearted support of his faithful wife Khadija to overcome his fears. I venture to suggest that this was an attestation of his integrity; a deliberate impostor bent upon deception would not have gone through those agonizing terrors. Furthermore, a careful reading of the early suras of the Qur'?shows that, even after he was convinced of the authenticity of his revelation, it was only with great reluctance that he accepted the awesome burden of his mission, and only after he was driven by an overpowering sense of the duty which he could not shirk.他經歷了一個時期相當懷疑和恐懼,害怕以免只和殘忍的缺德惡作劇開玩笑的撒旦,他需要的衷心支持他的忠實的妻子卡蒂嘉克服自己的恐懼。 我敢說,這是一個認證他的正直,一個彎後,騙子故意欺騙手段將那些沒有經歷過痛苦的恐懼。此外,仔細閱讀早期suras的古蘭經'?表明,即使在他確信他的啟示的真實性,它是只有極不情願,他接受了真棒負擔他的使命,才驅使他是由一個強烈的責任意識,他不能推卸責任。
(For more on the Christian missionary abuse of the Fatrah incident, see (欲了解更多有關基督教傳教士濫用的Fatrah事件,見 The Fatrah: Intermission of the Prophet Muhammad 該Fatrah:中場休息的先知穆罕默德 ) )
Claim #2: Muhammad supported his fledgling religion by robbing people 索賠#2:穆罕默德支持他的羽翼未豐的宗教人士的搶劫
(For more on the legislation and beginning of jihad, see (欲了解更多有關立法,並開始聖戰,見 The Legislation and the Beginning of Jihad立法和聖戰的開始 ) )
Claim #3: Muhammad was often ruthless towards his adversaries 索賠#3:穆罕默德對他的對手往往無情
On the contrary, the Prophet (P) was always gentle and treated his enemies kindly, and this is a fact recognised by the most virulent of his contemporary enemies.相反,先知(規劃)總是溫柔和善意對待他的敵人,這是一個事實承認的最致命的同時代的敵人。
(For more refutations to accusations of the so-called “brutality” of the Prophet (P), see (更多駁斥對指控的所謂“暴行”的先知(規劃),見 What About The Killing of Ka'ab bin Al-Ashraf? 怎麼樣殺Ka'ab本鋁阿什拉夫? and和 The Killing of Abu 'Afak and Asma' bint Marwan? 殺戮阿布'阿費克和Asma'賓特馬爾萬? ) )
Claim #4: Muhammad had far more wives than even his own revelations allowed 索賠#4:穆罕默德已有相當多的妻子甚至比他自己的啟示獲准
This is a false claim, as the injunction on the limitation of wives does not apply to the Prophet's (P) wives.這是一個虛假聲稱,由於禁令的限制並不適用於妻子的先知(P)的妻子。 As they had attained a high stature in the Muslim community of believers ( Ummul Mukminin or “Mothers of the Believers), it would be nothing short of an injustice to deprive them of their status by divorcing them and hence condemn them to humiliation.當他們達到了一個很高的地位在穆斯林社區的信徒(Ummul Mukminin或“母親的信徒),這將是沒有什麼短期的不公平,剝奪他們的地位,因此他們離婚譴責他們的侮辱。 For the Prophet's (P) marriages, a separate law was given to him, namely that he may not marry any more women after this revelation was revealed.對於先知(P)的婚姻,一個獨立的法律給他,即他可能不會有更多的婦女結婚後透露這一啟示。
(For more on the Prophet Muhammad's wives, see (欲了解更多有關先知穆罕默德的妻子,見 Why Was The Prophet Polygamous? 為什麼是先知一夫多妻? ) )
Claim #5: Muhammad consummated a marriage to a nine-year-old girl 索賠#5:穆罕默德完善婚姻到9歲的小女孩
(For more on Muhammad's relationship with Aisha, see (欲了解更多有關穆罕默德的關係與艾莎,見 The Young Marriage of Aishah 青年婚姻Aishah ) )
Claim #6: Muhammad had a contemptible opinion of women 索賠#6:穆罕默德有意見婦女卑鄙
(For more on the Islamic view of women, see (欲了解更多有關伊斯蘭婦女觀,見 The Position of Women in Islam 婦女的地位在伊斯蘭教 ) )
Claim #7: Muhammad is unique among prophets in that he is the only one to receive a revelation, proclaim it as part of God's message to man, and later take it back, claiming that it was actually from Satan. 索賠#7:先知穆罕默德是獨一無二的,他是唯一一個得到一個啟示,宣告它的一部分神的信息的人,後來把它收回,並聲稱這是真正從撒旦。
(For more on the Orientalist fantasy regarding this unauthentic tradition, see (欲了解更多有關這方面的東方幻想非真實的傳統,見 Those Are Their High-Flying Lies Indeed 這些都是他們自己在高空飛行的謊言的確 ) )
Hence from these mere selective “claims”, Mr Wood tries to conclude that:因此,從這些僅僅是有選擇性的“索賠”,伍德先生試圖得出這樣的結論:
On the contrary, the allegations that were hurled and repeated ad nauseam by the missionary is nothing new.相反,被投擲的指控,反复令人作嘔的傳教士是新鮮事。 They have been discussed, debated, and refuted by Muslim and non-Muslim scholars time and time again.他們進行了討論,辯論,並駁斥了穆斯林和非穆斯林學者一次又一次。 Mr. Wood is perhaps ignorant of the copious amount of material on these issues and who can blame him?伍德先生也許是無知的豐富的材料數量在這些問題上,誰又能責怪他呢? Perhaps he has been living in a mono-culture all his life and has never come across a single Muslim on the street.也許他一直生活在一個單一文化的所有他的生活,從未碰到過一個穆斯林在街上。
And it was possible to raise issues of doubt about the character of Jesus (P) in the Spanish Inquisition and Crusades era, for example?並有可能提出問題的性質的懷疑耶穌(P)的西班牙宗教裁判所和十字軍東征的時代,例如? Mr. Wood is trying to “pull wool” over his reader's eyes, without a doubt.伍德先生是試圖“瞞天過海”對他的讀者的眼裡,毫無疑問。
We will not make secret of the fact that reviewing Mr. Wood's article (not to mention我們不會讓秘密的事實,回顧 Wood先生的文章(不提 his series他的系列 of Christian belligerent nonsense) has been nothing but a most tiresome exercise.基督教的好戰廢話),但一直沒有一個最煩人的工作。 Mr. Wood tries to cast the illusion as though “criticism” of the Prophet (P) is something foreign or alien to the Muslim world.伍德先生嘗試投了幻想,就像“批評”先知(P)是外國或外來的東西向穆斯林世界。 On the contrary, attacking Islam has been as old as the founding of Islam itself and “criticism” of the Prophet (P) as old as Orientalism itself.相反,攻擊伊斯蘭教已被舊的創始伊斯蘭教本身與“批判”先知(規劃)一樣古老的東方學本身。
We also demand evidence from Mr. Wood about his claim that “anyone who raised such objections would…immediately be killed” .我們還要求證據伍德先生對他的說法:“誰提出了這樣的人反對將立即被殺死...”。 What is the proof of his sweeping statement?什麼是證明他的說法太籠統? In which countries are these people killed for their “criticism” and what is the nature of their so-called “criticism”?在哪些國家是這些人被殺害他們的“批評”,什麼是本質的所謂“批評”?
Yet Mr. Wood continues with:但伍德先生繼續為:
Unfortunately for Mr. Wood, Islam does not rise or fall on a single individual.不幸的是,伍德先生,伊斯蘭教沒有上升或下降的一個人。 It is true that the Prophet Muhammad is held in the highest esteem.誠然,先知穆罕默德是關押在最高的尊重。 It is actually more true to say the following about它實際上是更真實地說以下有關 Christianity基督教 : :
Indeed, countless individuals and groups have secretly wished for Islam's downfall from past to present.事實上,無數個人和團體有秘密祝愿伊斯蘭教的垮台從過去到現在。 However, we are not disturbed by the secret desires of Mr. Wood and his belligerent Christian missionary pals to see Islam's destruction.不過,我們不會受慾望的秘密伍德先生和他的好戰的基督教傳教士好朋友看到伊斯蘭教的破壞。 There is no reason to believe that Mr. Wood and his pals will succeed where their more “knowledgeable” predecessors in the likes of Margoliuth, Muir, Zwemmer and Pfander had failed before.我們沒有理由相信伍德先生和他的夥伴們將接替在那裡他們更多的“知識”的前輩在喜歡的Margoliuth,繆爾,Zwemmer和普凡德爾失敗過。
And with that, we say that only God knows best!有了這樣的,我們說,只有上帝知道最好的! 
Category:分類:
Polemical Rebuttals爭論辯駁Tags :標籤:
Answering Islam回答伊斯蘭教 , , Belligerence好戰 , , Bigotry偏執 , , Brains大腦 , , Christian Missionaries基督教傳教士 , , Eminent Writers傑出作家 , , Empire Of Faith帝國的信仰 , , Fanaticism狂熱 , , Ferocity惡 , , Glass Houses玻璃房子 , , Information Superhighway信息高速公路 , , Intolerence耐力 , , Life Of Muhammad穆罕默德的生命 , , Moral Example道德榜樣 , , Murderer兇手 , , Objections異議 , , Prophet Muhammad先知穆罕默德 , , Robber強盜 , , Sealed Nectar密封內克塔爾 , , World History世界歷史
Your whole premise, my dear Philip, is absurd.你的整個前提下,我親愛的菲利普,是荒謬的。 You made a comment here criticizing the author of this article for using certain words to refer to the missionary David Wood, when what you should have done, if you wanted to be taken seriously, was distance yourself from Wood's comments.您在這裡作出評論,批評這篇文章的作者使用某些詞彙來指傳教士大衛伍德,當你應該做的,如果你想受到重視,是距離自己從伍德的意見。 You will notice that in my initial response to you, I did not refer to Jesus_follower specifically (except when referring to the administrator's comments) but to Christians who use insulting ways to preach to Muslims.你會發現,在我最初的反應你的,我沒有提到具體 Jesus_follower(除非指管理員的意見),但基督徒誰使用侮辱性的方式來宣揚穆斯林。 You have refused to distance yourself from these missionaries (are they following the Biblical way of preaching??).您已拒絕將自己從這些傳教士距離(以下是他們的聖經講道方式??)。 That is enough for me to conclude that you are not interested in dialog and discussion.這是足以讓我斷定你不感興趣的對話和討論。
I am working with a christian missionary organization since last 10 years.我正與一個基督教傳教士組織自去年10年。 I have never felt for a single moment that i should consider this eligion as a true religion.我從來沒有感受到一刻,我應該考慮這個 eligion作為真正的宗教。 I am Muslim, but after joining this organization, thanks to Allah, that my beleif on Islam has become firm.我是穆斯林,但在加入這個組織,感謝真主,我的信仰伊斯蘭教,已成為堅定的。 Jesus says, if some one slaps on your one cheak, turn the other towards him to slap on that as well, if some one takes your coat from you, offer him the shirt too.耶穌說,如果有人摑你一綽,把其他對他拍的,作為好,如果有人把你從你的外衣,也給他的襯衫。 I ask, if i go to any christians house and kidnape his doughter for sex, will he follow me with his other doughter to offer????????我想問,如果我去任何基督徒的房子和kidnape他doughter性別,將他跟我同他的其他doughter提供???????? never possible coz its against nature of man.沒有可能的表兄弟姐妹及其對自然的人。 So, christianity for me, is totally against nature因此,基督教對我來說,這是完全違反自然
That, my friend, is not my point.這,我的朋友,是不是我的觀點。 While I cannot speak directly for Mr. Wood, I am horribly 'offended' (how loosely do we use that term ;) ) that you would put all Christians under an umbrella like the author has done here.雖然我不能直接伍德先生發言,我感到可怕的'得罪'(鬆散的,我們如何使用這個詞;))你乾脆把所有的基督徒在一傘如筆者在這裡完成。 To clarify, you just said that if I wanted to be taken sincerely I would have to distance myself from Mr. Wood's comments… excuse me if I'm wrong, but if I'm here to 'defend' Mr. Wood, why would I distance myself from him?為了澄清,你剛才說,如果我想採取真誠,我會自己保持距離伍德先生的意見 ...原諒我,如果我錯了,但如果我在這裡'捍衛'Wood先生,為什麼會我從他自己的距離?
As to Ashar's comment, I would gladly agree.至於 Ashar的評論,我會很高興地同意。 Christianity is different and against human nature.基督教是不同的,反人性。 The very idea that God would love totally depraved creatures so much that He would take on their likeness, and die in one of the worst ways ever known to man to save them, is totally unique.這種想法,上帝會愛完全墮落的動物這麼多,他會接受他們的肖像,並死在一個有史以來最嚴重的是人類已知的方法來拯救他們,完全是獨一無二的。 That's part of what sets Christianity apart from every single religion on earth, including Islam.這部分與台基督教除了地球上的每一個宗教,包括伊斯蘭教。 As to your premise, that is absolutely out of context.至於你的前提,這是絕對斷章取義。 The Bible also has laws for things like that.聖經也有規律的東西是這樣的。 Try reading the Old Testament for starters.試著讀舊約的啟動器。
In Christ, Philip在基督裡,菲利普