If you're new here, you may want to get regular updates via如果你是新这里，你可能想通过定期更新 RSS feed RSS提要 . 。 Thank you for visiting!谢谢您的访问！

Recently Sam Shamoun, a well-known belligerent and provocative Christian missionary at Answering萨姆萨姆最近，一个著名的好战和挑衅性的基督教传教士在回答 Islam 伊斯兰教 , ， issued发行 a “challenge” to Muslims to prove that一个“挑战”穆斯林的证明 Jesus耶稣 (peace be upon him) did not claim to be God, as per the Qur'anic statement. （愿他）并没有声称自己是上帝，按声明的古兰经。 His challenge is two-fold:他的挑战是两个方面：

(1) Challenging Muslims to show where in the Qur'an Jesus says he is not God or not the Son of God. （1）具有挑战性的穆斯林在那里显示古兰经耶稣说，他是不是上帝或不是神的儿子。

and和

(2) to bring the Aramaic phrase where Jesus disavows his claim to divinity. （2）使阿拉姆语耶稣disavows他声称神。

It is obvious, however, that his demands are as preposterous as they are stupid.这是显而易见的，然而，他的要求是荒谬的，因为它们是为愚蠢。 The Qur'an certainly当然古兰经 quotes报价 or paraphrases Jesus as saying that he is not God.或释义耶稣的话说，他不是神。 ^{1 一} and the Qur'an denies that he is a Son of God和古兰经否认他是神的儿子 ^{2 2} , but in Arabic. ，但在阿拉伯语。 This is because the Qur'an has affirmed itself to be revealed in Arabic text这是因为古兰经已肯定自己透露阿拉伯文字 ^{3 3} , sent down to an Arab prophet, lest its audience uses the excuse that they will not be able to understand the Qur'an if were brought down in a foreign tongue. ，发送到一个阿拉伯先知，以免观众使用的借口，他们将无法理解，如果在外国被带到了古兰经的舌头。

Furthermore, unlike the此外，不同于 Bible圣经 , the Qur'an is not a historical document written over the centuries by numerous scribes who were “inspired” and was later compiled into a book. ，古兰经是不是一个历史文件超过了谁是“灵感”，后来成书编制众多文士世纪写的。 The Qur'an is an Arabic text in nature and has always been in Arabic, therefore there is no need to bring an actual statement.古兰经是自然界阿拉伯文文本和一直以来在阿拉伯国家，因此没有必要把一个实际的发言。 To demand that the words of Jesus (P) be quoted in its original language would be akin to asking an English philosopher to quote the words of为了要求耶稣的话（p）是在其原有的语言将是类似于引述一位英国哲学家，要求引用的话的 Confucius孔子 in his original Chinese language to a totally American audience who does not understand Chinese!在他原来的中文，以一个完全美国观众谁不明白中国！

However, since Sam Shamoun has brought this needless issue up, we would like to issue a counter-challenge to the veracity of his claims.然而，由于萨姆萨姆带来了这个不必要的问题，我们想问题，一反挑战，其申诉的真实性。 Perhaps we might be inclined to accept his premise, and indeed even acknowledge that Jesus is indeed God in the flesh as per the Christian belief, if he and his missionary brethren are able to answer the following question:也许我们可能会倾向于接受他的前提下，甚至连承认耶稣是神在肉身确实按基督教的信仰，如果他和他的教会的弟兄能够回答以下问题：

Show us where precisely, in Aramaic , does Jesus say that he is God or the Son of God as in “more than a man” ?我们展示确切地说， 在阿拉姆语 ，耶稣说，他并不比一个人“上帝或上帝的儿子， 更在”？

We are not interested in quotations found in Greek, as it is generally accepted that the language Jesus, peace be upon him, spoke was我们不感兴趣，在希腊发现的报价，因为它是普遍接受的语言耶稣，愿他安息，发言，是 Aramaic阿拉姆 . 。 Therefore, it is not unreasonable to demand the exact Aramaic statements from Jesus, peace be upon him, and word-for-word , in inverted commas.因此，它不是不合理的要求准确阿拉姆耶稣从报表 ，平安在他身上，文字的字逗号，在倒置。

Furthermore, we demand that this此外，我们要求这 Aramaic阿拉姆 quote, assuming if one exists, is one which all New Testament scholars deem authentic and agree upon without question, including all the critical scholars.报价，假设如果存在，是所有新约圣经学者认为真正的问题，并同意在没有，包括所有重要的学者。 Moreover, there should be absolutely no controversy whatsover over the interpretation and, of course, the authenticity of this verbatim此外，应在解释绝对没有现存的争议，当然，这种逐字真实性 Aramaic阿拉姆 statement.声明。

If the missionary decides to quote something in Greek, or anything the interpretation of which is disputed or the authenticity of which is disputed, he would fail to meet our challenge.如果传教士决定引述希腊的东西，或什么是有争议的或者是有争议的真实性的解释，他将无法满足我们的挑战。 We want, we repeat, a verbatim我们希望，我们重申，一个逐字 Aramaic阿拉姆 quote, the authenticity and interpretation of which is not at all disputed, where Jesus says categorically “I am God” and where he claims to be the “ the Son of God”, as in “more than a man” .报价的真实性和解释，而这并不是在所有有争议的，耶稣说，断然说：“我是神”，并在那里他自称是“ 上帝的儿子”，如“”超过一人 。

And only God knows best.而且，只有上帝知道最好的。

1. See Qur'an, 5:116-117 where Jesus is explicitly quoted as follows: “And behold!见古兰经，5:116-117耶稣是明确引述如下：“看哪！ Allah will say “O Jesus the son of Mary! 真主会说“啊，耶稣玛利亚的儿子！ didst thou say unto men `worship me and my mother as gods in derogation of Allah”? He will say: “Glory to Thee! 复活，你说你们男人`我和我崇拜真主的母亲在为减损神“？ 他会说：”荣耀归于你！ never could I say what I had no right (to say). 可我从来没有说我没有权利（说）。 Had I said such a thing Thou wouldst indeed have known it. 如果我说了，那你确实知道它斜射。 Thou knowest what is in my heart though I know not what is in Thine. 你知道什么是我的心，虽然我不知道什么是你的。 For Thou knowest in full all that is hidden. 因为你晓得全部所有被隐藏。 “Never said I to them aught except what Thou didst command me to say to wit `Worship Allah my Lord and your Lord'; and I was a witness over them whilst I dwelt amongst them; when Thou didst take me up thou wast the Watcher over them and Thou art a Witness to all things. “ . “不要说我对他们的守望者除外7:28命令我什么祢机智的人说'我的上帝崇拜真主和你的上帝，而我是一个见证了他们，而我住在他们之间，当你复活，你需要我，废了他们和你是万物的见证 。“。 So basically the missionary has no case since we have here the statement of Jesus (P) who denies being God.所以基本上没有案件的传教士，因为我们这里有耶稣的声明（规划）谁否认自己的神。 Whether the missionary wants to believe that this is a “fictitious account”, that is not our problem.无论是传教士要相信这是一个“虚拟账户”，这不是我们的问题。 Our belief is that the portrayal of Jesus (P) in the New Testament is mostly fictitious , but it is not we who make silly challenges as the Christian missionary is fond of making!我们的信念是，约写照耶稣（P）的新的主要是虚构的 ，但它不是我们谁愚蠢的挑战，使基督教传教士为正喜欢！ [ [ back背面 ] ]
2. “Such (was) Jesus the son of Mary: (it is) a statement of truth about which they (vainly) dispute. “这样的（是）耶稣玛丽的儿子：（这是）一个真理声明哪些他们（妄想）争端。 It is not befitting to (the majesty of) Allah that He should beget a son. 它不是合适（的威严）真主，他应该生一个儿子。 Glory be to Him! 荣耀是他！ When He determines a matter He only says to it “Be” and it is.” (Qur'an, 19: 34-35) [ 当他决定了的事，他只是说，它“是”，它是。“（古兰经，19：34-35）[ back背面 ] ]
3. “A Book, whereof the verses are explained in detail; a Qur'an in Arabic for people who understand.” (Qur'an 41:3) [ “一书，下列代表详细解释经文， 一个 人谁知道 在阿拉伯语 的 古兰经 。”（古兰经41:3）[ back背面 ] ]