Bismika Alllahuma

Na veia usual da tradição do missionário¹, os missionários fizeram a rather tentativa pathetic em “refuting” um de nossos artigos que mostras o perversion do Bible no homosexuality incentivando. Previamente, nós mostramos dentro uma outra exposição como o “apostle so-called” da parte posterioa do esqueleto tinha indicado algumas tendências homosexual. Na parte mais atrasada deste artigo, nós forneceremos alguns exemplos de como os cristãos praticaram este ensino particular do Bible em suas vidas cotidianas.

Mas nós viremos àquele mais tarde. Nossa finalidade aqui é agora refute leitura do missionário a “no texto” e sua tentativa vicious e beligerante “girar as tabelas” no Islam reivindicando que o Qur' e o Sunnah incentivam o comportamento homosexual. Nas palavras do missionário:

“… nós estaremos usando próprios argumentos de Iqbal de encontro a seu deus e a seu prophet, apenas como nós o fizemos a última vez, quando atacaram o Apostle Paul.”²

O missionário continua esta exposição humourous indicando o seguinte:

“Em seu haste aos prophets verdadeiros Iqbal do deus do slander esqueceu-se aparentemente de que o árabe é uma língua cognate do Hebrew e tem palavras similares como rahman e rahim. Ambos estes termos vêm da mesma raiz de que nós começamos a palavra árabe para o womb, rahm.”

Quando o discurso dos cognates, o missionário for lembrado devida que parece se ter esquecido de sua régua very quando reivindicou brashly dentro um outro artigo de his isso ahad (un) meios “um de…” e não simplesmente “um”, como ele é compreendido por sua definição de dicionário. Certamente, ao falar sobre cognates, o Hebrew echad corresponde pròxima com ahad. Esta edição será tratada em um outro papel que seja forthcoming logo, insha' allah. O ponto aqui é que nós o encontramos divertir que o missionário está falando sobre cognates quando vem ao fato muito perturbando sobre o Hebrew raHamim e as tendências homosexual de Daniel de acordo com o cliente Biblical.

Em todo o caso, o missionário ele mesmo está cometendo “um fallacy etymological”, como ele ama assim reivindicar. O Hebrew cognate para o árabe rahman é rachuwm, as was shown in another paper. Hence the missionary claim that the word “…come from the same root from which we get the Arabic word for womb, rahm” only exists in the missionary’s mind in his usual rewriting of Semitic etymology, as it is tradition in the history of their lying polemics.

Yet the missionary concludes by stating:

“Applying Iqbal’s logic we must conclude that Allah and his messenger showed their mercy by having sexual relations with both male and female believers. Allah used Muhammad to show men his love by having his messenger engage in homosexual acts with them.”

As amusing as the imagination of the missionary is, we must kindly remind him that the penalty for homosexuality is very harsh in Islam, and before we allow his imagination to run away with him, let us now kindly quote for him a hadith from the Prophet (P) who says the following about the punishment for homosexuals:

“Whoever gratifies his sexual urge with another (individual} of his own sex, the Almighty will not so much as look at him.”

Now that we have seen the above hadith, we should kindly ask the missionary from where did he get his fatwa, and how will he reconcile this with the general Islamic opinion on homosexuality? We are hence strongly reminded of the following from Jalal Abualrub: When the Evangelist Becomes A Shaykh…

The rest of the missionary diatribe bears no relevance on the discussion and is just yet another attempt by him to obfuscate the issue by bombarding the reader with paragraphs of text. This is a tactic which is not lost unto us.³Also please see this book review on Judith Miller’s work.

Now that we have dealt with the matter succinctly, it is time to see how Christians put their “word of God”, specifically the engagement of homosexuality, into practice.

Several Examples of Homosexual Tendencies By Christians

The timeline of legalising same-sex marriages in western nations is evidence which clearly displays the homosexual behaviour and tendencies inherent in Christians. Indeed, from the reports that has been gathered above, same-sex marriages are only allowed in predominant Christian nations. Not one of the nations allowing same-sex marriages (i.e. homosexuality) has a predominant Muslim community. We challenge the missionary to answer this question: if what the missionary has been preaching all this while is true and that the Prophet Muhammad(P) indeed allows for homosexual behaviour, then why have not a single predominantly-Muslim nation have passed the law for legalising homosexual marriages in their respective countries? If it is Qur’anic to allow for same-sex marriages, then why are Muslims not practicing this so-called “Qur’anic” injunction, as per the claim of the missionary?

Further, we also challenge the missionary to inform us why same-sex marriages are being allowed in his country, i.e. the United States, as well as other western nations which has a sizable Christian community? For us, it is thus very conclusive that the legalisation of homosexual marriages has an example, and this example can only be obtained from the Bible, i.e. (as per the Biblical account of) Daniel and their Satanic apostle from Tarsus.

And only God knows best!

1. See our article on Lying in Christianity. It is the nature of their religion to strongly encourage lying and deception in their beliefs! [back]
2. Cf. refer to our exposition on the falsehood of Paul. [back]
3. Please refer to our articles which deal with Sam Shamoun and his diatribe on our website. [back]