If you're new here, you may want to get regular updates via如果你是新這裡，你可能想通過定期更新 RSS feed RSS提要 . 。 Thank you for visiting!感謝您訪問！

Recently the world's most maladroit missionaries have allowed最近，世界上最笨拙傳教士容許 an impromptu piece 1即興作品 to be published in response to Shabbir Ally's views on Surah al-Anbiyaa: 30.將刊登在回應 Shabbir盟友的意見 Surah基地Anbiyaa：30。 Personally I do believe that Shabbir's interpretation is wrong, albeit he was not the first Muslim to proffer such a cosmological hypothesis on this particular Holy Ayaah.我個人認為，Shabbir的解釋是錯誤的，儘管他不是第一位穆斯林向他們提供這樣一個假設，在這個特定的宇宙聖 Ayaah。 However I feel that a two-fold response is requisite.但我覺得，一個 2倍的反應是必要的。 I shall seek to demonstrate:我會設法證明：

(1) that Andrew Vargo's claims on classical Big Bang cosmology are blatantly erroneous and are the result of paramount nescience, and; （1）安德魯瓦戈的主張對古典大爆炸宇宙論是錯誤的，是公然的結果非常懵懂，和;
(2) I shall proffer a more appropiate interpretation on the Holy Ayaah in question. （2）我會毫無顧忌一個更合適的解釋的神聖 Ayaah問題。

Let us begin with my interpretation of the Holy Ayaah; Allah Subhan Wa Ta'alaa says:讓我們從我的理解聖Ayaah;真主薩巴罕華Ta'alaa說：

“Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together (as one unit of Creation), before We clove them asunder?” “不要不信道看到，天地人結合在一起（作為一個單位設定），之前我們丁香他們支離破碎？”

The important point in this Holy Ayaah is that the Arabic context refers to the universe and the earth as one ; “ ratq ” means “mixed or blended” so ratq describes the initial first materials that formed the entire universe; including the earth, and states clearly that they were mixed or blended. 在這重要的一點是，聖Ayaah阿拉伯語中是指宇宙和地球作為一個 ;“ratq”是指“混合或混合”等ratq介紹材料，初步形成了第一次整個宇宙，包括地球，各國顯然，他們混合或混合。 In the very incipient proviso's of the universe; the heavens aggrandized and cooled.在非常早期限制性條款的宇宙，天地，吉首，懷化和冷卻。 Particles of matter and anti-matter originated for minuscular periods of time; however the temperature would not sustain them for long.顆粒物質和反物質起源的時間為 minuscular時期，但氣溫將不能承受的長久。 The electromagnetic and weak interaction were then cleaved; now almost all of the anti-matter and matter was obliterated in this cleaving, except the minute amount that endured.電磁和弱相互作用然後切割，現在幾乎所有的反物質和物質被抹煞這裂解，除分鐘數額忍受。

Thus the first elements came about; and all this came to pass in around three minutes after the creation of time itself.因此，第一個元素的出現，以及所有這一切都應驗了在大約 3分鐘後，創建時間本身。 These elements just as Allah Subhan Wa Ta'alaa stated would ultimately form the physical constitution of our universe; including the earth.這些元素就像真主薩巴罕華Ta'alaa表示，最終形成了我們宇宙的身體素質，包括在地球上。 The Holy聖 Quran古蘭經 describes I think an evolution of the earth fro the very initial stages of the universes existence; that is the only way the Holy Ayaah can in my opinion be interpreted due to the context of the word employed.我想描述一個來回地球演化的最初階段存在的宇宙，這是唯一的出路聖 Ayaah在我看來是可以解釋的情況下，由於這個詞的就業。 In fact Abdallah Yusuf Ali; who did not have the same knowledge nor resources that I have available at the present time, still wrote in his commentary on the Holy Ayaah in question: “The evolution of the ordered worlds as we see them is hinted at.” Anyone familiar with the present-day data knows that the nascent properties in the early universe are what makes up the contents of our universe today, so we can look at the beginning of the universe as the earliest point of the earth's existence as it over time evolved by the Will of Allah Subhan Wa Ta'alaa ; the earth itself was, quite candidly created from elementary cosmic gas.事實上阿卜杜拉優素福阿里，誰不具有相同的知識，也沒有資源，我可以在現在，仍然寫在他的評論就在聖Ayaah問題：“在世界的有序演化，因為我們看到他們是在暗示。“任何熟悉當今數據知道，新生的物業在早期宇宙是什麼構成的內容，我們的宇宙今天，我們可以看看在開始時的宇宙最早點地球的存在，因為它隨著時間的演變由真主的意志薩巴罕華Ta'alaa，地球本身，很坦率地創建從初級宇宙氣體。

As I stated in my response to FTM's objections; the same way if I show my favorite picture of my mother and I you could object and say I am nowhere to be seen and that she is holding a baby; the objection is moot for that was me in the initial stages of my life and I grew over time by the Grace of Allah Subhan Wa Ta'alaa .正如我在我的回應 FTM的的反對，同樣的方式，如果我告訴我最喜歡的圖片，我母親和我對你可以反對，說我無處可看，她是抱著嬰兒;的反對意見是沒有實際意義因為這是我在最初階段，我的生命隨著時間的推移，我長大了格雷斯真主薩巴罕華Ta'alaa。

Now the démodé libel launched on Shabbir's hypothesis is surely worthy of a response; because it exposes Answering現在德莫德誹謗推出Shabbir的假設是值得肯定的答复; 回答 ，因為它暴露 Islam 伊斯蘭教 's absolute denseness to modern cosmology.的絕對密集的現代宇宙學。 You see, to my absolute astonishment a one Andrew Vargo actually tries to challenge the Big Bang theory.你看，我絕對驚訝一個安德魯瓦戈實際上試圖挑戰宇宙大爆炸理論的。 Based upon the most primitive of quondam scientific resources, he in his mendacious prattle gives us an abundance of reasons for suspecting that the Answering Islam team are not dexterous enough to offer a serious challenge to the Din ul Haq .基於最原始的科學資源庫翁達姆，他在為我們提供了一個虛假的閒話豐富的理由懷疑該回答伊斯蘭教隊並不靈巧，足以提供一個嚴重挑戰錠哈克 。 Vargo should not have ran his lips on such a enigmatic subject especially due to his severe ignorance to the topic; alas we can forgive the youngster for he probably just googled something along the lines of “how to disprove the most empirically verified model in cosmology to date”.瓦戈不應該跑到他的嘴唇在這樣一個高深莫測的主題，尤其是由於他的嚴重無知的話題很可惜，我們可以原諒，因為他可能只是年輕人 GOOGLE上搜索東西線沿線的“如何反駁最實證，以驗證模型的宇宙學日期“。

Anyway; he starts off by quoting Sir Fred Hoyle (who by the way, received an award for the most incorrect predictions in cosmology), Vargo then attempts to discredit the evidence for the Big Bang theory by simply rehashing criticism that was proposed aeons ago and received sufficient answers through observational averment.不管怎樣，他一開始便引用爵士弗雷德霍伊爾（誰的方式，獲得一個獎項為最不正確的預言在宇宙學），瓦戈然後試圖詆毀證據的大爆炸理論，簡單地再次提出批評，提出aeons前通過觀測得到充分的答案申辯。

Argument One: CBR, For or Against the Standard Model? 論據一：社區康復，支持或反對的標準模型？

Anon from as early as 1941 cosmic background radiation (CBR) was detected although at that point in time not with intent even though such detection was desideratum.不久，早在1941年從宇宙背景輻射（CBR）的檢測，雖然在那個時間點沒有這樣的意圖，即使檢測寄望最大。 Now you see; interstellar gas clouds in perpetuum subsume atoms and molecules.現在你看到，星際氣體雲在Perpetuum公司歸入原子和分子。 The spectra of molecules are much more labyrinthine, owing to the fact that molecules as an entity can circumvolve and electrons surge and leap around, however the important point is that molecules can be identified by their spectra. It was WS Adams who first noted the metastasis of cyanogen within a molecular cloud situated betwixt Zeta Ophiuchus and the earth. From the appurtenant data, A. Mckellar concluded that a single idiosyncratic line in the spectrum of cyanogen had no palpable explication unless of course the molecules were being agitated by photons with an estimated temperature of approximately 2.3 K.分子的光譜更為錯綜複雜，由於分子的事實作為一個整體可以circumvolve和電子激增和周圍的飛躍，但是很重要的一點是，分子可以識別它們的光譜。 這是亞當斯是誰首先注意到的轉移氰內的分子雲位於中間澤塔蛇夫座和大地。從從屬的數據，得出的結論是甲麥凱勒一個特有的光譜線氰沒有明顯的解釋當然，除非被激動的分子，估計由光子溫度約為 2.3光

Later on in 1965 George Field, NJ Woolf and IS Shklovsky came to realize the paramountcy of the aforementioned observation, and in 1993 I. Hawkin, DM Meyer and KC Roth took spectra of cyanogen in diversified clouds from amidst the more proximate stars and the earth purposively seeking out the CBR titillation.後來在1965年喬治菲爾德，新澤西州伍爾夫和IS什克洛夫斯基窺見至上上述觀察，並於 1993年一，霍金，糖尿病邁耶和KC羅斯參加了光譜氰多元化，白雲中越近因恆星和地球有目的地尋找的CBR的搔癢。 They found a temperature of 2.729 K which was congruous with the other older measurements; however COBE ie the Cosmic Background Explorer laid the argument to rest by duteously measuring the temperature to be 2.725 K. From the beginning of the hypothesis of an expanding universe the standard big bang model predicted this exact background radiation, which is just an exemplification of the hot dense era of our wonderful universes bodacious past.他們發現，溫度 2.729 K表是全等與其他較舊的測量，但科貝即宇宙背景探測奠定了休息duteously參數測量溫度為 2.725光從一開始的假設一個膨脹的宇宙標準大爆炸模型預言這一確切的背景輻射，這只是一個範例的熱稠密紀元的精彩宇宙bodacious過去。 So Vargo's first nonsensical claims on this matter have now been denuded as the ad hoc assertions that they were and always will remain, we cognize the fact that the big bang model predicted the CBR within a mathematical certainty; reality is. This because the Big Bang model presages that early on the matter density was immense as was the temperature and over time the universe expanded and cooled. To quote Professor John F. Hawley and Katherine A. Holcomb, “…it tells us immediately that the universe was once very much hotter than it is today, which by itself is convincing evidence for the hot big bang.”所以瓦戈的第一荒謬的索賠就此事現已剝蝕作為專案斷言，他們始終不會改變，我們認知一個事實，即大爆炸模型預言的CBR在數學的確定性;現實的情況。 這是因為宇宙大爆炸模型預示著早期的物質密度是巨大的，是在一段時間內溫度和宇宙的膨脹和冷卻。舉教授約翰F霍利和凱瑟琳答霍爾庫姆，“...它告訴我們，宇宙立即曾經非常熱比現在，它本身是有說服力的證據熱大爆炸。“ ^{1 一}

Vargo continues on apropos due to his impetuosity;瓦戈繼續進行中肯由於他的急躁情緒;

The problem with using the CBR as proof of the “Big Bang” is that CBR is uniform throughout the Universe…問題與社區康復作為證據使用的“大爆炸”是CBR的是整個宇宙的統一 ...

Is this guy kidding me? That is half of the argument for the Big Bang, the Robertson-Walker metric describes a homogeneous and isotropic space time. The fact that the universe is as the metric elucidates, was portended in the Big Bang model before it was confirmed.這傢伙跟我開玩笑吧？ 這是一半的說法為宇宙大爆炸時，羅伯遜，沃克度量描述了一個均勻和各向同性的空間時間。事實上，宇宙是作為度量闡發，是預示著在宇宙大爆炸模型前，得到了確認。 Vargo goes on to argue that the matter in the universe is not uniformed or as I understand him, evenly distributed.瓦戈接著認為，宇宙是物質在不穿制服，或我了解他，分佈均勻。 This is a preposterous claim; everyone knows that the universe has evenly distributed matter in large scales of super clusters. Furthermore; the matter density was also prognosticated (keeping in mind that there is non-luminous matter)and attested, additionally the necessitated proportionate value of the critical density corresponds to around 10 hydrogen atoms per cubic meter of space, thus the veritably existing matter successfully fulfill the needs of the standard Big Bang model hence the matter in our universe is precisely balanced and uniformed as predicted by the standard model.這是一個荒謬的要求，每個人都知道 ， 宇宙物質均勻分佈在大尺度上的超級簇。此外，該物質的密度也預測式（請記住，有不發光的物質）和證明，另外價值相稱的必要臨界密度相當於 10個氫原子周圍每立方米的空間，從而圓滿完成veritably現有問題的需要，標準大爆炸模型，因此這個問題在我們的宇宙是平衡的和穿制服的正是作為預測的標準模式。

To put it in a layman's term for Vargo: matter is uniformly distributed throughout the universe as well as concentrated in some places to a much higher extent than our galaxy.為了把它在一個外行的任期為瓦戈：物質是均勻分佈在整個宇宙中，以及在一些地方集中到一個更高的程度比我們的銀河系。 Vargo did not offer any alternative explanation for the CBR's existence, however since I am kind guy I will do it for him Insha'Allah.瓦戈並沒有提供任何其他的解釋為社區康復的存在，但由於我很親切的傢伙，我會做他Insha'Allah。 The surrogated theory is that the radiation comes from a background of gaseous and stellar exudations.該代辦理論是，來自一個背景輻射的氣體和恆星滲出。 But now its time for the nail in Vargo's argumentations emblematic coffin; COBE also confirmed that the radiation had to emanate from the universe itself, due to “the fidelity of the CBR to a blackbody spectrum”.但現在它的時間為釘瓦戈的論證象徵棺材;科貝還證實，輻射不得不源自宇宙本身，由於“富達的社區康復為黑體譜”。 Thus, the CBR has to be the radiation remnant of the big bang; there is quite simply no other option to this fact and hence there is just no real alternative to the Big Bang.因此，社區康復已成為輻射殘餘的大爆炸，但僅僅是因為沒有其他選擇了這一點，因此他們就是沒有真正的替代宇宙大爆炸。 ^{2 2} I could just leave it at that because the aforementioned is undisputed empirical evidence for the Big Bang model.我可以只給它，因為在上述經驗證據是不爭的宇宙大爆炸模型。 However, because I do not want to make it easy for the missionaries to cop out of this hilarious blunder I will push onwards and address Vargo's other two arguments against the standard model of the universe as taught in universities worldwide.但是，因為我不想讓您輕鬆的傳教士警察離開這個熱鬧的錯誤，我會起推動和解決瓦戈的其他兩個參數對標準模型的宇宙在全世界的大學任教。

Argument Two: The Amount of Helium Within the Universe, For or Against the Standard Model? 論據二：額在宇宙中的氦，支持或反對的標準模型？

I find it to be phenomenal how Vargo has failed to quote a book from after the year 1994; considering how daedal our wondrous field of cosmology is and how fast the consensus changes, this must be noted as one of Vargo's major fallacies, ie failing to keep up with cosmological advancement.我覺得它是驚人如何瓦戈沒有引述一本書年之後的1994年，考慮如何千變萬化的奇妙領域的宇宙學，怎樣快速的共識轉變，這是必須指出，作為一個瓦戈的重大謬誤，即不跟上宇宙進步。 Learn from experience, my friend.從經驗中學習，我的朋友。

Now he relegates us to a paper written by Alan Guth, however it is clear that the paper he refers us to has absolutely nothing to do with the helium problem. The very name of the paper, “A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problem” clearly shows that the paper was on what some call “the causality riddle”; the lack of any natural explanation for the universe's smoothness, albeit for theists this is no problem, and the paper was also trying to tackle the geometric idiosyncrasy of the universe once again a pseudo-problem for us theists.現在，他遇事我們一紙書面阿蘭古斯，但很顯然， 他指的文件我們已經完全沒有問題的氦。在這個名字的文件中，“可能解決問題的視界和平整度“清楚地表明，該文件是對有些所謂的”因果關係之謎“，缺乏任何自然的解釋宇宙的平滑度，雖然對於有神論者，這是毫無疑問的，該文件也試圖解決幾何特質的宇宙再次一個偽問題，我們有神論者。

Now by the 1950's the amount of helium was explained, but granted there was indeed an original gradiose exigency demanding an explanation on the vast amount of helium within the universe.現在由1950年的數額氦解釋，但確有一批原gradiose緊急要求作出解釋的大量氦在宇宙中。 Stars as everyone should know progenerate helium, however the Big Bang actualized most of the helium present in our universe today and then the rest was created by stellar paroxysm.明星大家都應該知道progenerate氦，但現實化的宇宙大爆炸目前大部分的氦今天在我們的宇宙 ，然後把剩餘是由恆星發作。 Furthermore helium has actually gone a long way to poise the big bang model, for the aggregated quantity of helium can be used so as to confirm the amount of species of neutrinos.此外氦實際上走過了漫長的道路，以沉穩的大爆炸模型，為聚合的數量可以用氦氣，以確定其金額種中微子。 Theoretical data from the big bang model predicted the existence of three species of neutrinos, measurements of the amount of helium coupled with amazing amounts of deuterium as well as lithium asseverate that there are three species of neutrino's; so we now have two empirical positive predications of the standard model.理論數據從大爆炸模型預言存在3種中微子，測量的數額氦加上驚人數量的氘和鋰斷言，有3種中微子的，所以我們現在有兩個實證積極預報作的標準模型。

Argument Three: The Redshift, For or Against the Standard Model? 論據三：紅移，支持或反對的標準模型？

Allah Subhan Wa Ta'alaa says: Waalssamaa banaynaha bi-aydin wa-inna lamoosioona , meaning, “And it is We Who have constructed the heaven with might, and verily, it is We Who are steadily expanding it.” (Surah Adh-Dhariyat, Holy Ayaah 47)真主薩巴罕華Ta'alaa說：Waalssamaa banaynaha雙艾登樺因娜lamoosioona，意義，“它是我們究竟是誰建造了天堂與實力，並能眾志成城，這是我們誰是穩步擴大它。”（Surah乙醇脫氫酶， Dhariyat，聖 Ayaah 47）

It is patently lucid that Vargo has not even an infinitesimal clue as to what a cosmic red shift is let alone whether or not they affirm or negate the standard Big Bang model.這顯然是清醒的瓦戈甚至沒有一個無限小的線索，以什麼是宇宙紅移是更遑論他們是否肯定或否定的標準大爆炸模型。 Observational evidence testifies to the fact that the universe is steadily expanding, so if a cosmic source is approaching an observer he/she will see a “blueshift”; that is when light waves are agglomerated and are thus tousled to more extensive frequencies.觀測證據證明這一事實，即宇宙是穩步擴大，因此，如果宇宙的來源是接近一個觀察員，他/她會看到一個“藍移”，即是當光波的團聚，因而蓬亂到更廣泛的頻率。 Hence if the source is moving away from the observer light waves shift to lower frequencies thus resulting in what we call a “redshift”. Edwin Hubble measured the redshift in the light from remote galaxies; his measurements proved that the universe is indeed enlarging.因此，如果來源是背離觀察者光波轉移到較低的頻率從而導致所謂的“紅移”。 埃德溫哈勃紅移測量在光從遙遠的星系，他的測量證明，宇宙確實擴大。 ^{3 3} Vargo preys on an error of Edwin Hubble that has since been rectified in light of cosmological advancement.瓦戈捕食錯誤的埃德溫哈勃已被糾正，鑑於宇宙的進步。

Hubble interpreted the extragalactic red shift in terms of the Doppler shift, “however, the red shift is caused by the relativistic expansio of the universe itself, but this was not understood at the time that Hubble and Humason were compiling their data..”哈勃紅移解釋了銀河系外的條款的多普勒頻移，“不過，紅移是由宇宙相對論及範圍的本身，而是這還不了解的時候，哈勃和赫馬森彙編了他們的數據 ..” ^{4 4} The measurement problems Vargo mentions are due to the those who did the measuring, to quote瓦戈提到的計量問題是由於這些誰做了測量，引用 Christianity基督教 's most prominent philosopher Dr. William Lane Craig, “…the anomalous red-shifts; these have been around for a long time, and they continue to be cleared up as better and better measurements are made of the objects that have these shifts.”歷史上最傑出的哲學家威廉博士克雷格巷“...異常紅移，這些已經存在了很長一段時間，他們繼續清理和更好的更好的測量是由該對象有這些變化。 “

Conclusions 結論

I genuinely hope you are reading this, Mr. Vargo, and I do not want you to be abashed by the aforementioned; cosmology is a wonderful field, alhamdulillah.我真誠希望你讀這，瓦戈先生，我不希望你是窘迫由上述，宇宙學是一個美好的領域，alhamdulillah。 However, my friend, you must put in the hard yards.不過，我的朋友，你必須把硬碼。 I suggest you purchase upgraded text books and always make it a point to keep up with the latest cosmological data, Insha'Allah.我建議你購買課本和升級始終使它成為一個指向跟上最新宇宙數據，Insha'Allah。 Now bethinking on my neoteric interpretation of Surah al-Anbiyaa Holy Ayaah 30 the rest of Vargo's criticism falls apart; except a few last dash's of aberrant, senseless and unadulterated falsehood. First of all Vargo completely prevaricates the Islamic view of creation; allow me to outline the account real quick Insha'Allah.現在bethinking我近代解釋Surah基地Anbiyaa聖Ayaah 30日的休息瓦戈的批評分崩離析，除了少數最後衝刺的異常，毫無意義和十足的謊言。首先瓦戈完全推諉的作法，伊斯蘭認為創造;讓我綱要的帳戶真正快速Insha'Allah。

1. 1。 Creation of the universe from nothing.創造宇宙從虛無。 (Surah al Anaam, Holy Ayaah 101) （Surah人安阿姆，聖 Ayaah 101）
2. 2。 The heavens and the earth were mixed or blended in the inceptive conditions of the universe.天空和大地混合或混合在宇宙的開端條件。 This is after the universe's initial instant of creation (Surah al-Anbiyaa, Holy Ayaah 30)這是在宇宙的最初瞬間的創造（Surah基地Anbiyaa，聖 Ayaah 30）
3. 3。 “Fatq” the cleaving asunder of the electromagnetic and weak interaction; which then annihilated all of the anti-matter as well as most of the matter, except a small remnant thus the first elements came about. “Fatq”的切割，各行其是的電磁和弱相互作用;而當時殲滅所有的反物質，以及大部分的問題，除一小部分殘餘從而首次來的。 ( Ibid. ) （ 同上 ）
4. 4。 The universe remains nothing but vapor ie gaseous elements as the earth is created.宇宙仍然只是水蒸氣氣體元素，即地球是創建。 (Surah Fussilat, Holy Ayaats 9-12) （Surah Fussilat，聖 Ayaats 9-12）
5. 5。 Stars are beautified and the rest of the cosmos continue to change by the Will of Allah Subhan Wa Ta'alaa.星星美化，其餘的宇宙繼續改變真主的意志薩巴罕華 Ta'alaa。 (Surah al Imran, Holy Ayaah 109) （Surah人伊姆蘭，聖 Ayaah 109）

And yes stars can exist in the gaseous stage; the Arabic word used for smoke in the Holy Ayaah is “dukhan” which can mean “smoke”, “mist” or “vapor”.是的恆星存在於氣態舞台，阿拉伯字用於煙在聖地 Ayaah是“杜漢”這可能意味著“煙”，“霧”或“氣”。 Smoke in classical semantics can mean flying particles as well as a mist or vapor according to the Macquarie dictionary.煙霧在古典語義意味著飛行顆粒以及霧或蒸氣根據麥格理字典。 Mist can mean a cloud of particles resembling a fog or a cloud like entity, and vapor is just a substance in the gaseous state.米斯特可能意味著一個類似雲粒子雲像霧或實體，蒸汽只是一種物質的氣體狀態。 All of which can describe the universes initial conditions after baryogenesis, inflation (exponential increase in R), the fundamental particles, and the cleaving asunder of the electromagnetic and weak interaction.這一切都可以描述宇宙的初始條件後 baryogenesis，通貨膨脹（指數增加R）的基本粒子，以及切割四分五裂的電磁和弱相互作用。 “All stars are huge balls of gas, mostly hydrogen held together by gravity.” “所有的星星是巨大的氣體球，主要是由氫共同舉行的嚴重性。” ^{5 5}

Keeping in mind that gravity is merely a dynamism and is in fact the weakest of the four fundamental forces and it is carried by a purely hypothetical massless boson “the graviton, which has not yet been detected.銘記這僅僅是一個充滿活力的嚴重性，實際上是在最弱的四種基本力量，它是由一個純粹的假設的無質量的玻色子“的引力，這還沒有被偵破。 Now the gas that makes up a star is held together by two competing forces, keeping in mind that dukhan can be translated as vapor as discussed before; which is in turn merely a substance in a gaseous state.現在，煤氣，使一個明星一起舉行了兩個相互競爭的力量，同時要注意的杜漢 ，可譯為蒸汽作為討論過的，而後者僅僅是一個氣態物質。 Stars can thus be counted in the universal stage that is described in Surah Fussilat Holy Ayaah 12 as stars are merely gas held together by their hydrostatic equilibrium.(Keeping in mind that the majority of the Galaxy is still filled with clouds of gas).因此，可以計算明星在普遍階段中描述的Surah Fussilat聖 Ayaah 12明星們一起舉行了天然氣只是他們的流體靜力平衡。（請記住，大多數人的銀河仍充滿氣體雲）。 Hence all of Vargo's objections with regards to the order of Creation are silenced.因此所有的瓦戈的反對與問候創作的順序是鴉雀無聲。

So we now confront the plagiarism hypothesis, Carrier and Giron proposed similar if not identical arguments indeed the tautology is rather frustrating.因此，我們現在面臨的剽竊假說，載體和吉龍提出類似的論點，如果不相同的同義反复確實是相當令人沮喪。 Anyway Vargo writes:無論如何瓦戈寫道：

The Hindu Rig Veda says that the universe was created when the golden “cosmic egg” was split.鑽機的印度教吠陀說，宇宙誕生時的黃金“宇宙蛋”的分裂。

The point is that in the creation myths, none of the them explain that the heavens and the earth were “mixed or blended” ; on the contrary they assume that either there was a solid cosmic egg (as Vargo points out) or that the the heavens and the earth where two solid objects that somehow got intertwined.問題的關鍵是， 在創造神話，沒有了他們解釋說，天地是“混合或混合”，相反他們認為，要么有一個堅實的宇宙蛋（如瓦戈指出），或在該天地在兩個固體物體，不知怎的，交織在一起了。

All of the myths contain necromantic aspects from thaumaturgic wind coiling like a massive serpent; to physical beings breathing in space.所有的神話包含巫術方面，從捲取強大魔法師的風像一個巨大的蛇身體的生命呼吸的空間。 The Holy Qur'an contains none of the aforementioned flaws/errors rather, Allah Subhan Wa Ta'alaa explains that the heavens and the earth were once mixed or blended; and then split asunder.神聖的古蘭經包含沒有上述缺點 /錯誤，而是真主薩巴罕華 Ta'alaa解釋說，天空和大地曾經混合或混合，然後分裂四分五裂。

Vargo needs to point out where the presupposed plagiarism is within the Holy Qur'an and why it does not include the erroneous aspects of the older creation myths. 瓦戈指出，在需要的先決條件是在抄襲古蘭經 ，為什麼它不包括錯誤的方面，老創造神話。 Via Vargo's flawed logic, when Darwin proposed the theory of evolution since the Greeks believed in an agnate theory of human origins, he must have merely been plagiarizing from the Greeks who also predicted that man evolved from a common source.通過瓦戈的邏輯缺陷，當達爾文提出進化論以來，希臘人認為在父系人類起源理論，他只是被剽竊必須從希臘人誰也預言，人類進化的一個共同的來源。 Needless to say, Vargo's assertion is ab absurdo .不用說，瓦戈的說法是 AB absurdo。 The ancients did indeed guess various details with regards to nature that have been substantiated, so if the Holy Qur'an mentions a correct phenomena that was perhaps encompassed in older cultures; that is not grounds to claim that the Holy Qur'an is the accruement of “cultural borrowing”.古人確實猜測各種細節，就自然已經得到證實，因此，如果古蘭經提到一個正確的現象，也許包含在舊文化，這是不是理由聲稱，古蘭經是計提“文化借用”。

All in all, Vargo has made a bold claim yet provided nothing pertinent to the furtherance of his theory; alas, we see that Answering Islam has no respect for scholarship nor the Truth.總之，瓦戈作出了大膽的說法卻沒有提供相關的推進他的理論，很可惜，我們看到， 在回答不尊重伊斯蘭教 ，也不是真理的獎學金。

And only God knows best.而且，只有上帝知道最好的。

1. Professor John F. Hawley and Katherine A. Holcomb, Foundations of Modern Cosmology , Oxford University Press 2006; p.教授約翰F霍利和凱瑟琳答霍爾庫姆， 現代宇宙學的基礎 ，牛津大學出版社，2006;山口 412 [ 412 [ back背面 ] ]
2. For a brief discussion on quantum alternatives and a critique of the SEC model please see my paper對於一個簡短的討論量子替代品和批判的美國證券交易委員會模型請參見我的論文 The Ultimate Questions終極問題 [ [ back背面 ] ]
3. Edwin Hubble, “A Relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 15 (1929): pp.埃德溫哈勃，“阿關係之間的距離和徑向速度外銀河系星雲”程序的國家科學院 15日（1929年）：頁。 168-73 [ 168-73 [ back背面 ] ]
4. Professor John F. Hawley and Katherine A. Holcomb, Foundations of Modern Cosmology , Oxford University Press 2006, p.教授約翰F霍利和凱瑟琳答霍爾庫姆， 現代宇宙學的基礎 ，2006年牛津大學出版社，第 290 [ 290 [ back背面 ] ]
5. Ibid. , p. 同上。山口 126 [ 126 [ back背面 ] ]