If you're new here, you may want to get regular updates via如果你是新这里,你可能想通过定期更新 RSS feed RSS提要 . 。 Thank you for visiting!谢谢您的访问!
M. Tariq Quraishi 米塔里克Quraishi
During his years at McGill, Dr.在麦吉尔期间,他多年博士 Ismail al-Faruqi司马义基地Faruqi 's talent as a disputant was recognized by his peers.作为一个争论者天赋被他的同行的认可。 His ability to pursue the opponent's argument to its logical conclusion was augmented by his mastery of the rhetoric.他的能力,以追求对方的论据的逻辑结论是增强了他对修辞的掌握。 The way he conducted himself during his encounters with people of other faiths can be seen in the following excerpt from his dialogue with Bishop Kenneth Cragg and Father Michael Fitzgerald at Chembesy on June 26, 1976.期间进行的方式,他与其他信仰的人,他遇到自己可以在以下摘录看到他与主教肯尼思克拉格和父亲迈克尔杰拉德对话Chembesy 6月26日,1976。
Fitzgerald: I would like to ask for clarification of Dr. al-Faruqi's statement that Islamic da'wah is ecumenical par excellence , by virtue of its comprehensive recognition of all the religions as de jure . 杰拉德:我想声明要求对澄清博士基地Faruqi基督教,伊斯兰宣教是法律上的卓越 , 德凭借宗教作为其全面的承认所有。 In fact, what is meant by all religions?其实,什么是所有宗教的意思? Having recourse to Apollo and other gods and goddesses is a kind of religion, but would求助于阿波罗和其他神和女神是一种宗教,但会 Islam伊斯兰教 recognize this as well as all other religions as de jure ?认识到这一点以及作为法律上的所有其他宗教呢?
al-Faruqi: Islam recognizes all religions as de jure , and then it invites the adherents of these re ligions to begin the task of criticism. 基地Faruqi:伊斯兰教承认所有宗教在法律上为,然后它请重新ligions的信徒,开始对这些批评的任务。 No religion is ruled out by the Muslim a priori .没有宗教是由穆斯林统治的先验 。 In other words, if I meet someone who has never heard of Islam and who worships, for example, an “X” or “Y”, whatever that may be, I as a Muslim am not free to call him a pagan, or to regard him as condemned by God; rather, I must talk with him in order to discover what his religion is, in the belief that God must in His mercy have sent a prophet to him, for the Qur?an says: ?And there is no people unto whom God has not sent a prophet? (Q. 35:24)换句话说,如果我遇到一个人从来没有听说过谁,谁崇尚伊斯兰教,例如,一个“X”或“Y”,不管它可能是,我作为一个穆斯林我不能自由地称他为异教徒,或把他看成神的谴责,相反,我要与他交谈,以发现他的宗教是什么,在上帝的信仰,必须在他的怜悯派,为他古兰经先知?一说:?而且有你们谁没有人神并没有差遣先知?(问:35:24)
Believing then that God in His mercy must have told him something, I meet with him with a view to being instructed about his faith, and then I in vite him to research his own tradition in order to discover the essential message that God has given him.然后,在他相信上帝怜悯的东西必须告诉他,我与他会晤,以指示正在对他的信仰,然后在他的维生素E,研究自己的传统,以发现的重要信息,就是上帝给了他我。 And if, in relation to that central revealed core, the rest of the beliefs and practices of that religion as developed through而且,如果有关,中央显示核心,信仰和宗教的做法是,由于发达国家通过 history历史 turn out to be a pack of lies, that would be an empirical discovery for me.变成是一个骗人的鬼话,那将是我的实证发现。 But for the Muslim this must never be an a priori decision which condemns a man because he “doesn't believe in my God my way”.但对于穆斯林这决不是一个先验的决定,谴责一个人,因为他“不相信我的神我的路”。
However, if I discover that religion has been corrupted and falsified beyond recognition, then I have a duty to tell him about the Qur'an, God's final revelation, to present it to him as rational truth, and invite his consideration.不过,如果我发现宗教已被损坏,面目全非伪造的,那么,我有责任告诉古兰经,神的最后启示,他提出作为理性真理给他,并请他考虑。 If he says, “I don't want to listen”, then either he is malevolent or a fool.如果他说,“我不想听”的话,他是邪恶的,是愚昧。
Cragg: What you are saying, then, is that God has sent prophets everywhere, but ex hypothesi these prophets must be consistent with Islam. 克拉格:你说,那是上帝派遣先知无处不在,但根据假设这些先知必须符合伊斯兰教。
al-Faruqi: Yes, Islam as religio naturalis , din al fitrah . 基地Faruqi:是的,伊斯兰教的宗教naturalis,喧嚣基地fitrah。
Cragg: But that which in Buddhism is antithetical to Islam and to rationalism is not simply chaff mixed with wheat, if I may put it that way; it is the very wheat of Buddhism. 克拉格:不过,这在佛教是对立的伊斯兰教和理性不是简单糠小麦混合,如果我可以这样说的,它是佛教非常小麦。 By your analysis here it must then have been a false prophecy which brought the Buddhist to that belief.通过你的分析,然后在这里就必须有一个错误的预言而带来的佛教色彩,这种信念。
al-Faruqi: I won't say a false prophecy. 基地Faruqi:我不会说假预言。 I would say that a true revelation through an authentic prophet has been thoroughly falsified.我会说,通过一个真实的先知启示已经真正彻底伪造的。
Fitzgerald: But by which historical criteria is the “true” prophet to be identified? 杰拉德:但是其中的历史条件是“真”先知去识别呢? And where is the “true” prophecy of which you speak within Buddhism?在哪里是“真”的预言,其中您在佛教发言?
al-Faruqi: I don?t know, but it can be researched; the fact that I assume it to be there at the origin is at least a good step in the direction of ecumenical tolerance. 基地Faruqi:我不?吨知道,但它可以研究,事实上,我以为它是起源于有至少一个普世性好步的方向。
Cragg: It seems rather an escape hatch of a theory, because if a prophet is really a prophet then his message becomes known, it is balagh , communication; and if it has not survived historically it must be mythical. 克拉格:似乎是一个理论,而逃生舱口的,因为如果是真正的先知先知那么他的消息成为众所周知,它是balagh,沟通;如果它没有生存历史,必须神话。
al-Faruqi: No. 基地Faruqi:号 At one time it was known.有一段时间它被称为。 But then later on it became falsified as the Hebrew message became falsified, and the Christian message was falsified.但后来它被形容为希伯来语成为伪造虚假信息,和基督教的信息是伪造的。 1 一
3 Responses for 3反应的 "The Communicator: The Dialogue at Its Best" “通讯者:在对话的最佳”
I think the other guy raised alot of good points and that al-Faruqi just made stuff up to hopefully make the logical problem that the other guy raised go away.我认为其他人提出了很多好的意见和铝Faruqi刚才的东西最多希望使逻辑问题,其他人提出离开。 It got corrupted.它被损坏了。 Gee, it seems like God let everything get corrupted.哎呀,好像上帝让一切得到损坏。 That's always the iron clad excuse that they pull of of their pocket.这是铁一般的总是借口,他们对他们的口袋拉。 There is a gap in the logic, so a consopiracy theory is invented to fill the gap.有一个逻辑上的差距,所以consopiracy理论发明填补这一缺口。 And the surprising part, is that people think al-Faruqi gave a good answer.而令人惊讶的一部分,是人们认为基地Faruqi了一个很好的回答。 I guess they have a cewrtain liking or predispostion to conspiracy theories.我想他们有一个cewrtain喜欢或predispostion阴谋理论。 That's about all I can think.这是我能想到的所有。 Very odd indeed.很奇怪的事。
I think there is no “conspiracy” involved with the statement that the message preached by, say Jesus, got corrupted over the passage of time.我认为有没有“阴谋”的说法鼓吹的消息,说耶稣,得到了时间的流逝损坏有关。 This is a historical fact, something readily acknowledged by all scholars with the exception of the most hardcore conservative Christians.这是历史事实,承认的东西很容易与最铁杆的例外,所有的学者保守的基督教徒。 Scholars only disagree over the degree of changes/corruption.学者只是不同意以上的变化程度/腐败。 For a long time scholars have been trying to unearth the historical Jesus, precisely because it is realized that over the passage of time the story of Jesus evolved into something else.长期以来学者一直在努力挖掘历史上的耶稣,正是因为它是意识到了时间的推移,耶稣的故事演变成别的东西。
Similarly, that the writings within the Jewish Bible underwent evolution and were composed from different sources by unknown authors at different times, long after the events alleged within them, is also pretty much acknowledged by all scholars.同样,这在犹太圣经的著作,并从演化经历了由不知名的作者在不同时间,不同来源组成后不久在他们所指称的事件,也几乎所有的学者所公认。 Certainly, I believe that the basic message of monothiesm is still preserved in the Jewish and even the Christian writings, yet the fact that certain changes have taken place over the passage of time cannot be denied.当然,我相信monothiesm基本信息仍保留在犹太教和基督教著作,甚至,但某些变化,在时间的推移发生的事实不容否认。
What about Budhism etc?关于佛教总会等什么? Do we have the message of Budha pure unadulterated?我们是否有消息Budha纯十足? I doubt many scholars would answer in the affirmative.我怀疑许多学者将答案是肯定的。
The message of Jesus has been retained in the same manner as the Qur'an has been retained.耶稣的消息已被保留在相同的方式保留了古兰经。 It is studied in its original language, and great care has been taken to ensure its accuracy throughout the ages.它是研究在其原始的语言,已经采取非常小心,以确保整个时代的准确性。 If the only version available nowadays was the English, then I think there would be grounds to say the message has been tainted.如果只版本现在是英语,那么我认为会有理由说该邮件已被污染。 But since it is widely studied in the original Greek, I think there are no causes for worry about Christ's message being lost.但由于它是在原来的希腊广泛的研究,我认为是有关于基督的信息不再担心丢失的原因。