Nous nous présentons ci-dessous une citation de Tony Blair, premier ministre du Royaume-Uni, qui a été édité tout à fait récemment dedans Affaires étrangères, Janvier le février 2007. En ce qui concerne ses vues sur le Qur' et la religion de l'Islam, il est évident que deen fait prouver voie-enregistrent de la tolérance religieuse inégalée dans l'histoire du monde et sont concédés par des historiens dans les goûts de De Lacy O Leary et de Thomas W. Arnold. À la différence du christianisme - en bref, d'une religion barbare et intolérante que seulement l'appel est qu'il est enduit dans les rituels paganistic romains - réclamant la destruction des communautés religieuses différentes de son propre (et qui ont été exemplifiées dans les croisades, la recherche espagnole et aujourd'hui égal en Irak et en Afghanistan), l'Islam a apporté sa lumière brillante aux civilisations du monde, plaçant un exemple sans précédent de tolérance et de prospérité religieuses. La citation est comme suit. L'emphase accentuée est notre propre. À moi, la chose la plus remarquable au sujet de Coran est comment le progressif il est. J'écris avec la grande humilité en tant que membre d'une autre foi. En tant qu'étranger, Coran me frappe comme livre reforming, essayant de renvoyer le judaïsme et le christianisme à leurs origines, beaucoup comme des réformateurs essayés pour faire avec les siècles d'église chrétienne plus tard. Coran est inclus. Il exalte la science et la connaissance et déteste la superstition. Il est pratique et lointain en avant de son temps dans les attitudes vers le mariage, les femmes, et le gouvernement. Sous ses conseils, la diffusion de l'Islam et son excédent de dominance les terres précédemment chrétiennes ou païennes étaient stupéfiants. Au-dessus des siècles, l'Islam a fondé un empire et a mené le monde dans la découverte, l'art, et la culture. Les standard-porteurs de la tolérance dans les âges moyens jeune étaient bien pour être trouvés dans les terres musulmanes que dans le chrétien ceux.1 Il serait intéressant, naturellement, pour voir les missionnaires chrétiens brouiller pour répondre à ce rapport par Tony Blair. Pour plus d'élaboration sur la relation entre l'Islam et d'autres religions, voyez cet article aussi bien. Et seulement Dieu sait mieux !
Subscribe
Subscribe Articles With
Bloglines, Google Reader, My MSN, Netvibes, Newsburst
Newsgator, Odeo, Pluck, Podnova, Rojo, My Yahoo!, Desktop Reader
By Month
Most Popular Articles
- The Authentic Gospel of Jesus: Evidence That Demands Christians Rethink Their Faith
- The Consensus on Homosexuality and The Illiteracy of Christian Polemicists
- Missionary Activity in Kosovo and the Causes of Muslim Conversions
- Learning Christianity in five minutes
- Response To "Muhammad as Al-Amin (the Trustworthy): How His Enemies Really Viewed Him" And The Christian Missionaries
- An Eye-Opening Biblical Narration
- Another Rational Approach to the Prophethood of Muhammad (P)
Jabberwolf said on 2 January 2007:
DoctorMaybe said on 3 January 2007:
Jabberwolf you are as thick as two short planks. Of the many erroneous statements you made against Islam, this I found to be the most ignorant: “Islam has never been tolerant in history and today shows no sign of it”
Let’s see what the Encarta Encyclopedia 2007 CD has to say:
The Muslim rulers did not force their religion on the Palestinians, and more than a century passed before the majority converted to Islam. The remaining Christians and Jews were considered “People of the Book.” They were allowed autonomous control in their communities and guaranteed security and freedom of worship. Such tolerance (with few exceptions) was rare in the history of religion. Most Palestinians also adopted Arabic and Islamic culture. Palestine benefited from the empire’s trade and from its religious significance during the first Muslim dynasty, the Umayyads of Damascus. When power shifted to Baghdād with the Abbasids in 750, Palestine became neglected. It suffered unrest and successive domination by Seljuks, Fatimids, and European Crusaders (see Caliphate; Crusades). It shared, however, in the glory of Muslim civilization, when the Muslim world enjoyed a golden age of science, art, philosophy, and literature. Muslims preserved Greek learning and broke new ground in several fields, all of which later contributed to the Renaissance in Europe. Like the rest of the empire, however, Palestine under the Mamluks gradually stagnated and declined.
Microsoft ® Encarta ® 2007. © 1993-2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Another interesting finding of Gordon D. Newby who said in his book, “A Concise Encyclopedia of Islam”: As the different version of Islamic practice spread first throughout the Mediterranean world and then beyond, to South Asia, to Africa, and to South East Asia, they brough a new model for living grounded in the Quran and the Sunnah of Muhammad”. he continues, “It brought a worldwide network of trade in commodities and ideas that made the Islamic life attractive wherever it went. Even in the earliest period, when Muslims were conquering the ancient empires, Islam’s succession at conversion was through attraction rather than coercion”
shadowofears said on 17 January 2007:
What is terrorism exactly? The Canadian Winston Dictionary defines terrorism as follows;
“…to fill with great alarm and fear; reduce to a state of terror; to govern by methods which arouse terror…”
We have seen throughout history many examples of terrorists and terrorism, for instance, the Crusades, the Inquisition, the New England Witch Hunts, Lenin, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mussolini, Adolf Hitler, the IRA, the Ku Klux Klan, Timothy McVeigh, David Korresh and Milosovich, just to name a few. The evil actions of those mentioned speak for themselves, with the crimes they perpetrated against humanity. Sadly, today, terrorism continues at a feverish pace, with no end in sight. Another sad fact is that the word “Terrorism” has somehow become synonymous with the word “Muslim”. The religion of Islam is being presented by certain media and religious groups as a religion of war and violence. The term “Islamic Fundamentalists” seems to be the in vogue catch phrase when it comes to describing the actions of a misguided few. However, when one examines the true meaning of the word “Fundamentalist”, you will realize that the Fundamentals of Islam do not conform to the actions of terrorists. Quite the contrary, Islam is a religion whose fundamental teachings pertain to peace and understanding and it is these True Qur’anic teachings that I wish to explore here, Insha’Allah(God Willing). It is sad to think that whenever a crime is committed by a Muslim, the religion of Islam is put on trial. If we were to follow that analogy, and considering that, with the exception of Lenin, Stalin and Pol Pot, all the above mentioned individuals and groups were Christian or from a Christian background, is it right to blame all Christians and the religion of Christianity for the crimes committed by these terrorists? And considering that the fathers of communism were all Jewish or of a Jewish background, would it be proper and fair to blame all Jews and the religion of Judaism for the evils of communism? No, it is not right and just the same, to blame all Muslims and the religion of Islam for the crimes committed by terrorists is equally wrong
Stunned said on 7 June 2007:
How do you like this quote taken from the same article and stated just before the quote you have taken: “The roots of the current wave of global terrorism and extremism are deep. They reach down through decades of alienation, victimhood, and political oppression in the Arab and Muslim world. Yet such terrorism is not and never has been inevitable.”
The way you are summarising Tony Blairs article on “A Battle for Global Values”, how you are using a short quote for your apparently apologetic interests in the name of “Muslim responses to anti-Islam polemic” as well as the distorted title you choose (not at all what TB said in the sentence you have taken your title from) should make the reader very suspicious.
Such methods, the moment they are discovered, usually turn out to become agruments against the stated intentions of the writer to search and reveal truth.