If you're new here, you may want to get regular updates via Ak ste tu nový, možno budete chcieť získať pravidelné aktualizácie cez RSS feed RSS feed . . Thank you for visiting! Ďakujeme vám za návštevu!

The following is one of the most interesting Biblical stories I have came across. Nižšie je jedným z najzaujímavejších biblických príbehov som narazil. I thought I'd share it with the readers. Myslela som, že podeliť sa s čitateľmi. Many Christians such as in the likes of Sam Shamoun, Craig Winn and others simply love going around bad-mouthing the Qur'an, saying that it contains “perverted, nonsensical teachings”. Mnoho kresťanov, ako v likes Sam Šamúna, Craig Winn a iní proste láska deje okolo Bad-trepaniu Qur'an, hovorí, že obsahuje "zvrátené, nezmyselné učenia".

Let us have have a glimpse of their “sensical” Majme mať letmý pohľad na ich "sensical" Bible Biblie . .

“And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham [is] the father of Canaan. These [are] the three sons of Noah: and of them was the whole earth overspread. "A synovia Noé, ktorí vyšli z korábu, boli Šém, a šunkou, a Jefet: a šunkou [je] otec Kanaána. Tieto [sú] tri synovia Noé: a z nich bola celá krajina rozprestrel. And Noah began [to be] an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard: And he drank of the A Noah [začali byť] hospodára, a on vysadil vinicu: A pije wine víno , and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. And Ham, the father of Canaan , saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without. , A opil sa, a obnažila sa u prostred stanu svojho. A Ham, otec Kanaána, videl svojho otca obnaženého a povedal obom svojim bratom mimo. And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid [it] upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces [were] backward, and they saw not their father's nakedness. A Šém a Jefet vzal odev, a položil [ju] na oboch ramenách, a išiel dozadu, a prikryli nahotu svojho otca, a ich tváre [boli] zaostalý, a oni nevideli hanby svojho otca. And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. A Noe precitol z opojenia, a vedel, čo jeho mladší syn urobil jemu. And he said, Cursed [be] Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. “ A on povedal:, Prekliaty [je] Kanaána, služobník služobníkov bude svojim bratom. " ^{1 1}

Before I proceed further I would like to state for the record that Muslims are utterly shocked and offended that the Bible portrays great messengers of God as low-live drunkards. Než som sa pokračovať ďalej by som chcel uviesť do protokolu, že moslimovia sú úplne šokovaní a urazený, že Biblia zachytáva veľké Božie poslov ako low-live opilci.

Coming back to the story, notice how the story says Ham, THE FATHER of Canaan. Vracia do príbehu, Všimnite si, ako ten príbeh hovorí Ham, otec Kanánův. This is rather interesting. To je pomerne zaujímavé. Seems like it's trying to prove or lead to something. Vyzerá to, že sa snaží dokázať, alebo viesť k niečomu.

In summary, Noah became drunk and dropped naked in his tent. Stručne povedané, Noah opil a spadol nahý vo svojom stanu. Ham, Noah's second son found him in that state and told his brothers about it. Šunka, Noemova druhý syn ho našiel v tomto štáte, a povedal jeho bratia o nej. According to many Biblical experts Ham didn't just tell his brothers about it, he also laughed at his father's state. Podľa mnohých biblických odborníkov Hamu nebol len povedať jeho bratia o nej, aj on sa smial jeho otca štátu. This is considered as an offense to Noah and is the reason why Noah made the curse. To je považované za trestný čin k Noé a je dôvodom, prečo Noe z prekliatia. The two other sons Shem and Japheth were ashamed of their father's nakedness and covered him without looking. Ďalšie dva synovia Šém a Jefet hanbili svoje hanby otca a prikryla ho, bez sa. When Noah gained consciousness, he knew what Ham did and started cursing, “And he said, Cursed [be] Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren.” Keď Noah získal vedomie, vedel, čo urobil šunkou a začal nadávať, "a on povedal:, Prekliaty [je] Kanaána, služobník služobníkov bude svojim bratom."

Did you catch the joke? Vedeli ste chytiť vtip?

Noah had three sons: Shem, Ham and Japheth. Noe mal troch synov: Sema, Chama a Jáfeta.

Ham had four sons Šunka mal štyri synov ^{2 2} : Cush, Mizraim, Phut and Canaan. : Chus, Mizraim, Put a Kanan.

When the narration is analysed, a question arises: “who was responsible for looking at Noah's nakedness?” The answer is Ham. Keď je analyzovaný rozprávanie, vyvstáva otázka: "Kto bol zodpovedný za pohľade na nahotu Noah?" Odpoveď je Ham. Christians argue that the action of Ham was a sin, hence the curse. Kresťania tvrdia, že akcia Hamu bol hriech, preto prekliatie. For the sake of argument, we agree. Na účely argumentácie, sme sa dohodli. Yet, who was responsible and thereafter cursed? Napriek tomu, kto bol zodpovedný a potom prekliaty? Ham was responsible, but, who was made to pay? Šunka bol zodpovedný, ale kto bol robený platiť? Was it Ham? Bolo to šunku? No. Canaan, an innocent little child, was made to pay for the error of Ham. Nie Kanaána, nevinné malé dieťa, bola vykonaná platiť za chyby Ham. The father who is responsible was reprieved and the son who's innocent was punished. Otca, ktorý je zodpovedný bol reprieved a syn, ktorý je nevinný bol potrestaný. Further more, why was Canaan out of four siblings singled out? Ďalej, prečo bol Kanaán zo štyroch súrodencov vyčlenené? Is this justice or madness? Je to spravodlivosť, alebo šialenstvo?

Can you imagine something like that happening today? Viete si predstaviť niečo podobné sa dnes deje? I love analogies, so let us have one : Miluju analógie, tak nech nám majú jednu:

James has four children. James má štyri deti. He committed murder. Sa dopustil vraždy. He is apprehended, brought to court and is found guilty. Ak bol dolapený, postavený pred súd a je uznaný vinným. The judge decided that the punishment is the “injection”, ie death. Sudca rozhodol, že trest je "injekcia", tj smrť. However, the injection is given to his youngest son and he in turn is released without cost. Avšak, je injekcia na svoju najmladší syn a on je zase prepustený bez nákladov.

Once again, is this justice or madness? Opäť, je to spravodlivosť, alebo šialenstvo? I leave the verdict to the readers. Nechám verdikt čitateľom. ^{3 3}

1. Genesis 9:18-25, KJV [ Genesis 9:18-25, KJV [ back späť ] ]
2. Genesis 10:6 [ Genesis 10:6 [ back späť ] ]
3. In addition, how is this strange tale reconciled in light of the following: Okrem toho, ako sa tento podivný príbeh zladené s ohľadom na nasledujúce:

   “The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin.” (Deuteronomy 24:16) [ "Otcovia nesmie byť usmrtený pre deti, ani synovia trestaní budú na hrdle za otca: každý človek bude usmrtený pre vlastnú hriech." (Deuteronómium 24:16) [ back späť ] ]