Bismika Alllahuma

Ibn Hazm (994CE-1064CE)はスペインイスラム教の時代の間にコルドバからの大きい評判のイスラム教学者、だった。 彼は広くように「比較宗教の父」見なされる。 資格を与えられる彼の祝われた最高傑作 KitabのAlFasl fiのAlのMilalのwaのAlAhwaの」 waのAlNihal、彼は聖書の複数の世紀そしてKrentzが是認するように、Hazmが批評一般に第1表すIbn、とはいえ基礎的な、組織的歴史的な批評によって現代聖書の原文批評を前日付けにした¹. 彼は聖書の内部否定の多くの例の提供によって聖書の原文批評の彼の腕前を示した。 次の聖書の否定はから得られた 他の宗教のイスラム教の理解: Ibn Hazm KitabのAlFasl fiのAlMilalのwaのAlAhwaのの調査」 waのAlNihal² そしてinsha」アラーは聖書に対して凝固するためにこれ彼の議論を精製するように聖書およびキリスト教のIbn Hazmの批評および私達の部分のそれ以上の精密さのエキスを再生する進行中のシリーズの部分充満である。

神の変更か、または彼の心を変えないか。 Ibn Hazmに従って、出国32:10は- 14および33:3 - 14帰する Albada」 (心の変更)神にそれ故にこれは彼のAll-Knowing属性に関して神および彼の特性の性質に問題を示し。

私達は次の通り出国32:10 - 14 --を引用する:

「従って…今私を単独で許可しなさい、その私の憤りはそれらに対して熱い燃え、私はそれらを消費するかもしれない; しかしあなたの私は作る大きい国家を」。 しかしMoses主を懇願し、「Oの主、彼の神はなぜthy憤り燃えるthouのhastが強大な手強国とを搭載するエジプトの土地から持ち出したthy人々に対して熱い言った、か。 エジプト人はなぜ言う邪悪な意思を用いる`彼持って来た山のそれらを殺害し、地球の表面からの」消費するためにそれらを、べきであるか。 thy激しい憤りからの回転はthy人々に対してこの悪の、後悔し。 Remember Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, thy servants, to whom thou didst swear by thine own self, and didst say to them, ‘I will multiply your descendants as the stars of heaven, and all this land that I have promised I will give to your descendants, and they shall inherit it for ever.’” And the LORD repented of the evil which he thought to do to his people.

Yet in another passage, it seems that there was a different agreement. The following is from Exodus 33:3-14:

“And I will send an angel before you, and I will drive out the Canaanites, the Amorites, the Hittites, the Per’izzites, the Hivites, and the Jeb’usites. Go up to a land flowing with milk and honey; but I will not go up among you, lest I consume you in the way, for you are a stiff-necked people.” When the people heard these evil tidings, they mourned; and no man put on his ornaments. For the LORD had said to Moses, “Say to the people of Israel, ‘You are a stiff-necked people; if for a single moment I should go up among you, I would consume you. So now put off your ornaments from you, that I may know what to do with you.’” Therefore the people of Israel stripped themselves of their ornaments, from Mount Horeb onward. Now Moses used to take the tent and pitch it outside the camp, far off from the camp; and he called it the tent of meeting. And every one who sought the LORD would go out to the tent of meeting, which was outside the camp. Whenever Moses went out to the tent, all the people rose up, and every man stood at his tent door, and looked after Moses, until he had gone into the tent. When Moses entered the tent, the pillar of cloud would descend and stand at the door of the tent, and the LORD would speak with Moses. And when all the people saw the pillar of cloud standing at the door of the tent, all the people would rise up and worship, every man at his tent door. Thus the LORD used to speak to Moses face to face, as a man speaks to his friend. When Moses turned again into the camp, his servant Joshua the son of Nun, a young man, did not depart from the tent. Moses said to the LORD, “See, thou sayest to me, ‘Bring up this people’; but thou hast not let me know whom thou wilt send with me. Yet thou hast said, ‘I know you by name, and you have also found favor in my sight.’ Now therefore, I pray thee, if I have found favor in thy sight, show me now thy ways, that I may know thee and find favor in thy sight. Consider too that this nation is thy people.” And he said, “My presence will go with you, and I will give you rest.”

When one compares the above passages side by side, the internal contradictions between especially Exodus 32:10, 32:14 and 33:2-3 on the one hand and Exodus 33:14 on the other, clearly raises many problems of theological and moral concern from the Biblical context. In this case that was quoted above, in spite of God’s determination to punish the Israelites for their idolatrous conduct, He did not execute punishment due to the intercession of Moses who had “reminded” God of His promise made with Abraham and the patriachs for their descendents. This Biblical passage seems to implicitly suggest that this “reminder” had made God realise his “wrong” decision and have Him repenting for it. Such an obvious “error” or even to imply such a thing is hardly befitting any person of integrity, let alone God, the Almighty.³

Hence the implications of Exodus 33:2-14 compared to other Biblical passages on the chartacteristics of God as discussed by Ibn Hazm is manifold:

(1) God is accused of breaking His promise and changing His decision and mind;
(2) God is accused of violating the principles of justice and told lies.

With the problems that are evident in Exodus 33:2-14, one must either agree to the above accusations against God or admit that this is an internal contradiction which does not agree with passages concerning God and His characteristics in the other parts of the Bible. Most certainly in this case, Ibn Hazm’s criticism of the Bible with regard to God contradicting Himself is thus not without basis and here the Bible contradicts itself internally.

And only God knows best!

1. Edgar Krentz, The Historical Critical Method (Fortress Press, 1975), p. 41 [back]
2. See Ghulam Haider Aasi, Muslim Understanding Of Other Religions: A Study of Ibn Hazm’s Kitab al-Fasl fi al-Milal wa al-Ahwa’ wa al-Nihal (Adam Publishers, 2004), pp. 92-114 for a summary of Ibn Hazm’s major criticisms of the Pentateuch. [back]
3. Ibn Hazm Kitab al-Fasl, pt. 1, pp. 163-164; Ghulam Haider Aasi, ibid., p. 105 [back]