Learning Christianity in Five Minutes学习基督教在5分钟内

Published on:发布时间:

Tuesday 30 Oct, 2007星期二2007年10月30日

Email This PostPrint This Post

If you're new here, you may want to get regular updates via如果你是新这里,你可能想通过定期更新 RSS feed RSS提要 . Thank you for visiting!谢谢您的访问!

Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi莫哈末Elfie Nieshaem Juferi

It is well-known that the “这是人所共知的“ Christianity基督教 ” of today has dubious origins, which ironically does not come from “今天有来历不明的,它具有讽刺意味的并非来自 Jesus耶稣 , peace be upon him (although the whole structure is attributed to him), but from ,愿他(虽然整体结构,是因为他),而是从 Paul of Tarsus保罗塔尔苏斯 , who can be rightly referred to as “that Satanic apostle” . ,谁能够正确地称为“使徒的撒旦”。 For it was Paul who laid down the religious foundations of today's Christianity, doctrines based on the idolatry and philosophical thought of the Greco-Roman empire at the time.因为这是保罗谁规定了今天的基督教,教义上的偶像崇拜和希腊罗马帝国的哲学思想在当时的宗教基础。

The following video by通过下面的视频 Sheikh Khalid Yasin谢赫哈立德亚辛 of New York summarises the essence of the Christian religion in five minutes.纽约总结了5分钟的基督教宗教的本质。

This video is hosted at这部影片是位于 Live Leak现场泄漏 .

Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi莫哈末Elfie Nieshaem Juferi is the founder and executive director of the Bismika Allahuma website.是创始人和Bismika Allahuma网站执行董事。
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Live
  • NewsVine
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • BlinkList
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • SphereIt
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Fark
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Posterous
  • Twitter
  1. Denis Giron says: 丹尼斯吉龙 说:

    This struck me as being exceedingly hard to take seriously.这是极其艰苦的印象是我认真对待。

    For example, one premise of his argument seems to be that if a book was compiled 40 or more years after the time of Jesus, then that book is not a reliable text.例如,他的一个论点的前提似乎是,如果一本书编制40年或以上的时间后,耶稣,那本书是不是一个可靠的文本。 Was not the traditional date for the composition for the Qur'an (significantly) more than 40 years after the time of Jesus?不为传统的古兰经组成之日起(明显)超过40年后的耶稣呢? Would Mr. Yasin be willing to admit that this is a poor argument?亚辛先生会愿意承认这是一个贫穷的论点? Or would he prefer to merely special plead on behalf of the Qur'an?或者他只是特别喜欢对古兰经请命代表?

    What is this bit about last names?这是什么有关姓氏位? Does every man on the planet even today, in the 21st century, have a first and last name?难道地球上的每个人,甚至在21世纪的今天,拥有一个和最后一个名字? And what is that bit about all the Church Fathers agreeing that, perhaps, these were just pen name, because no man would only put his first name and “according to”?什么是对全体教会同意父亲的位,也许,这只是笔名,因为没有人会只把他的名字和“依据”? I am very confident that Mr. Yasin would not be able to list even one Church Father who stated such, unless he drastically altered the meaning of “Church Father”.我很有信心,亚辛先生将无法列出甚至一个教会的父亲谁这样说,除非他彻底改变了意思是“教会之父”。

    And what serious authority, whether or Christian or not, actually believes that Paul authored all the books from Acts to the end of the New Testament?什么严重的权威,不论是否基督徒与否,实际上认为,从行为的所有保罗撰写的书籍到新约结束? I cannot think of a single scholar, whether Christian or secular, who believes that Paul authored either of the two epistles attributed to Peter, the three epistles attributed to John, the epistles attributed to James, the epistle attributed to Jude, much less the Apocalypse attributed to John.我想不出一个学者,无论是基督徒还是世俗的,谁认为,保任两个书信撰写归咎于彼得,三书信归功于约翰,书信归功于詹姆斯,书信归功于裘德,更不是启示由于约翰。

    He seems intent on setting up a dichotomy between what Jesus said, and what is said about Jesus in the New Testament.他似乎就建立一个与耶稣说什么意图的二分法,什么是对耶稣说,在新约。 What is his methodology for separating the two?什么是他的两个分离的方法? And, as he went through the litany of things those authors said about Jesus, why did he not include the virgin birth?而且,他通过一连串的事情了这些作者对耶稣说,为什么他不包括处女的诞生? Does the same sort of insinuated reasoning not apply?是否暗示推理的同类型不适用?

    In short, and with all due respect to Mr. Yasin, I found this video to be filled with quite a few errors and instances of poor reasoning.总之,所有应有的尊重与亚辛先生,我发现这是与不少错误和恶劣推理instances填补视频。

  2. Musa says: 穆萨 说:

    Assalamu 'alaykum Assalamu'alaykum

    I send to you two little debates about Jesus and his alleged divinity我送你两本关于耶稣和他的所谓神的小辩论

    http://www.dailymotion.com/ivo.....s-god_news http://www.dailymotion.com/ivo.....s-god_news

    http://www.dailymotion.com/ivo.....ion_events http://www.dailymotion.com/ivo.....ion_events

    I think, it's interesting我认为,这很有趣

  3. that khalid yasin speech left 22 australians converting to islam哈立德亚辛是在22日讲话澳大利亚人转换为伊斯兰教 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....re=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....re=related

  4. tariq says: 塔里克 说:

    Denis,丹尼斯,

    There are a few issues with your response, let me explain the biggest one:有您的回应几个问题,让我解释一下最大的一个:
    The time of writing down of the Quran was in the lifetime of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW).作者写下来的时间是在古兰经的先知穆罕默德(声表面波)的寿命。 Different companions of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) owned various parts of the written revelation.先知穆罕默德的不同的同伴(锯)拥有的各部分的书面启示。 Also the Quran was MEMORIZED in its entirety during the time of the prophet by many people.也可兰经被记忆的全部期间,许多人的先知时间。 When it was compiled during the caliphate of Uthman (RA) less than 30 years after the death of the Prophet (SAW), a committee of memorisers (Hafiz) of the Quran was formed (under the chairmanship of the scribe of the Prophet (SW)- Zaid (RA), who used to write down the Quran when it was revealed to Prophet Muhammad (SAW)), then those who had pieces of the revelation were called in, and after cross verification from all these sources, the Quran was compiled.当它被编译期间,奥斯曼哈里发(RA)的不到30年后的先知(锯),一个memorisers(哈菲兹的古兰经)委会成立了死亡的先知(西南文士主持( ) - 扎伊德(RA)的,谁用时写下的古兰经是透露给先知穆罕默德(声表面波)),那么这些谁的启示有被称为块,从所有这些来源交叉验证后,可兰经被编制。 No other religion has preserved revelation from God as Islam has!没有任何其他宗教保留了从神的伊斯兰教的启示!

    This is the essential difference (missed by many Christians) between what is the strength of Islam and the weakness of other religions.这是本质上的区别(错过了许多基督徒)之间是什么力量的伊斯兰教和其他宗教的弱点。 Islam has a strong “CHAIN of NARRATION” for every document.伊斯兰教为每个文档的叙事强烈的“链”。 No other religion on the face of the earth has such a verification process.无论是在地球上其他宗教有这样的验证过程。 We KNOW who each of the people were in that committee which compiled the Qur'an, we know their antecedents and their lifestyles.我们知道谁是人民中的每个委员会的编制的古兰经是,我们知道他们的前因和他们的生活方式。 We know the opinions of their contemporaries about them, they lived their lives in the full light of history to be verified by posterity.我们知道对他们的同时代人的意见,他们生活在充满历史被后人验证光他们的生活。

    The same is true for the Hadith (sayings and actions of the Holy Prophet (SAW)).同样是为圣训(说法和神圣先知(锯))真正的行动。 When Imam Bukhari wrote his famous treatise on Hadith (it was not the first by any means), and when he quotes a saying from the Prophet (SAW), there is a chain of narrators of each saying right upto the Prophet (SAW)… “So-and-so heard from so-and-so heard from so-and-so that the Holy Prophet (SAW) said… “.当伊玛目布哈里圣训写下了他著名的论文(这是不以任何方式第一),而当他引述从先知(锯)说,有一种说法正确upto每个先知(锯)叙述者链... “某某听到某某从某某某,让神圣的先知(锯)说...”听到。 We know who each of these people in the chain were, we know if they really met the people they claimed to have narrated from, we know if they were truthful or not, we know if they were forgetful or not, we know who were their teachers and we know what their contemporaries and teachers thought of them.我们知道谁在连锁这些都是每个人,我们知道他们是否真的符合人们他们声称已经从叙述,我们知道它们是否是真实与否,我们知道他们是健忘的,或没有,我们知道谁是他们的老师,我们知道他们的同时代人,老师对他们的看法。

    All this is made possible by the science of “Asma-war-Rijaal”, and thousands of scholars over hundreds of years dedicated their lives to this science.所有这一切成为可能的“阿斯玛,战争Rijaal”科学,成千上万的学者在献出生命的这门科学几百年。 They painstakingly compiled biographies of each and every narrator of the Hadith and analyzed and debated them under a microscope, leaving out no detail of their life.他们精心编制的每一个叙述者的圣训和分析讨论,并在显微镜下他们的传记,留下了他们的生活没有任何细节。 The lives of 500,000 narrators were compiled this way. 50解说员的生活是这样编制。 And all for verifying what ONE man, our beloved Prophet (may peace and blessings of Allah (SWT) be upon him) had said or did.为验证一个人是什么,我们敬爱的先知(愿真主祝福的和平与(SWT)的是他)曾说过都这样。 The masters of Hadith travelled thousands of miles to collect one saying and to verify one chain of narration from him.对圣训的主人千里收集一说,并核实他一个叙事链。

    In contrast now lets take Christianity, do we know who Mark was?现在可以采取相反的基督教,我们知道谁是马克? Do we know who taught him about Isa – Jesus (PBUH)?我们知道谁教他对伊萨 - 耶稣(愿他平安无恙)? Do we know anything about his character or truthfulness or piety or his forgetfulness and grasp of reality?我们知道他的性格或真或虔诚或他的健忘和现实的把握吗? Wait, do we even know his last name?等等,我们甚至不知道他的姓? No!不! And is this what we are supposed to base our ultimate salvation on?而这是我们都应该立足我们的最终得救吗?

    Index of Abbreviations-指数的缩写,
    SAW- Sallallahu 'alayhi wa-sallam: Peace and blessings of Allah (SWT) be upon him SAW的Sallallahu'alayhi佤-萨拉姆:和平与真主的祝福(SWT)的时,他
    PBUH – Peace be upon Him愿他平安无恙 - 愿他安息

    I apologize if I hurt someone's feelings with this, but the issue is larger than our feelings, it is salvation itself.我很抱歉,如果我伤害了这个人的感情,但问题是我们的感情比大,这是拯救自己。

    Peace和平
    Your brother in humanity,你哥哥在人类,
    Tariq塔里克

    Leave a Reply留下一个回复

    You must be你必须 logged in登录 to post a comment.张贴评论。