If you're new here, you may want to get regular updates via如果你是新這裡，你可能想通過定期更新 RSS feed RSS提要 . 。 Thank you for visiting!感謝您訪問！
It is well-known that the “這是人所共知的“ Christianity基督教 ” of today has dubious origins, which ironically does not come from “今天有來歷不明的，它具有諷刺意味的並非來自 Jesus耶穌 , peace be upon him (although the whole structure is attributed to him), but from ，願他（雖然整體結構，是因為他），而是從 Paul of Tarsus保羅塔爾蘇斯 , who can be rightly referred to as “that Satanic apostle” . ，誰能夠正確地稱為“使徒的撒旦”。 For it was Paul who laid down the religious foundations of today's Christianity, doctrines based on the idolatry and philosophical thought of the Greco-Roman empire at the time.因為這是保羅誰放下宗教基金會今天的基督教教義的基礎上的偶像崇拜和哲學思想的希臘羅馬帝國時的時間。
The following video by通過下面的視頻 Sheikh Khalid Yasin謝赫哈立德亞辛 of New York summarises the essence of the Christian religion in five minutes.紐約的本質概括的基督教宗教在5分鐘。
This video is hosted at這部影片是位於 Live Leak現場洩漏 . 。
Category:分類：
Bible聖經 , ， Christianity基督教 , ， History歷史 , ， Multimedia多媒體 , ， Sources of the Bible聖經的來源4 Responses for 4回應為 "Learning Christianity in Five Minutes" “學習基督教在五分鐘”
This struck me as being exceedingly hard to take seriously.這給我的印象是極其難以認真對待。
For example, one premise of his argument seems to be that if a book was compiled 40 or more years after the time of Jesus, then that book is not a reliable text.例如，一個前提他的論點似乎是，如果一本書編制 40年以上的時間之後的耶穌，那麼這本書是不是一個可靠的文本。 Was not the traditional date for the composition for the Qur'an (significantly) more than 40 years after the time of Jesus?是不是傳統的日期組成的古蘭經（顯著）超過 40年的時間之後的耶穌？ Would Mr. Yasin be willing to admit that this is a poor argument?亞辛先生會願意承認這是一個貧窮的論點？ Or would he prefer to merely special plead on behalf of the Qur'an?或者他只是特別喜歡申辯代表古蘭經？
What is this bit about last names?這是什麼有點姓氏？ Does every man on the planet even today, in the 21st century, have a first and last name?難道地球上的每個人即使在今天，在21世紀，擁有一個和最後一個名字？ And what is that bit about all the Church Fathers agreeing that, perhaps, these were just pen name, because no man would only put his first name and “according to”?什麼是位對所有的教會的父親同意這點，也許，這只是筆名，因為沒有人會只把他的名字和“依據”？ I am very confident that Mr. Yasin would not be able to list even one Church Father who stated such, unless he drastically altered the meaning of “Church Father”.我很有信心，亞辛先生將無法列出甚至一個教會的父親誰這樣說，除非他徹底改變了意義“教會之父”。
And what serious authority, whether or Christian or not, actually believes that Paul authored all the books from Acts to the end of the New Testament?什麼嚴重的權威，不論是否基督徒與否，實際上認為，所有的書的作者保羅從行為到最後新約？ I cannot think of a single scholar, whether Christian or secular, who believes that Paul authored either of the two epistles attributed to Peter, the three epistles attributed to John, the epistles attributed to James, the epistle attributed to Jude, much less the Apocalypse attributed to John.我想不出一個學者，無論是基督徒還是世俗的，誰相信，保羅撰寫任兩個書信歸咎於彼得，三書信歸功於約翰，書信歸功於詹姆斯，書信歸功於裘德，更不是啟示由於約翰。
He seems intent on setting up a dichotomy between what Jesus said, and what is said about Jesus in the New Testament.他似乎熱衷於建立一個二分法之間耶穌說，什麼是耶穌所說的在新約。 What is his methodology for separating the two?什麼是他的兩個分離的方法？ And, as he went through the litany of things those authors said about Jesus, why did he not include the virgin birth?而且，他經歷了一連串的事情的作者說，關於耶穌，他為什麼不包括處女的誕生？ Does the same sort of insinuated reasoning not apply?是否同一類型的暗示推理不適用？
In short, and with all due respect to Mr. Yasin, I found this video to be filled with quite a few errors and instances of poor reasoning.總之，所有應有的尊重與亞辛先生，我發現這個視頻充滿了不少錯誤和實例推理差。
Assalamu 'alaykum Assalamu'alaykum
I send to you two little debates about Jesus and his alleged divinity我送你兩個小辯論關於耶穌和他的所謂神
http://www.dailymotion.com/ivo.....s-god_news http://www.dailymotion.com/ivo.....s-god_news
http://www.dailymotion.com/ivo.....ion_events http://www.dailymotion.com/ivo.....ion_events
I think, it's interesting我認為，這很有趣
that khalid yasin speech left 22 australians converting to islam哈立德亞辛是在22日講話澳大利亞人轉換為伊斯蘭教 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....re=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....re=related
Denis,丹尼斯，
There are a few issues with your response, let me explain the biggest one:有幾個問題與您的回應，讓我解釋一下最大的之一：
The time of writing down of the Quran was in the lifetime of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW).其時寫下的古蘭經是在一生中的先知穆罕默德（聲表面波）。 Different companions of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) owned various parts of the written revelation.不同的同伴的先知穆罕默德（聲表面波）擁有各地的書面啟示。 Also the Quran was MEMORIZED in its entirety during the time of the prophet by many people.也可蘭經被記憶的全部時間，在許多人的先知。 When it was compiled during the caliphate of Uthman (RA) less than 30 years after the death of the Prophet (SAW), a committee of memorisers (Hafiz) of the Quran was formed (under the chairmanship of the scribe of the Prophet (SW)- Zaid (RA), who used to write down the Quran when it was revealed to Prophet Muhammad (SAW)), then those who had pieces of the revelation were called in, and after cross verification from all these sources, the Quran was compiled.當它被編譯在哈里發的奧斯曼（RA）的不到30年後死亡的先知（鋸），一個委員會的memorisers（哈菲茲）組成的古蘭經（主持下的文士的先知（西南） - 扎伊德（RA）的，誰用時寫下的古蘭經是透露給先知穆罕默德（聲表面波）），那麼這些誰曾件的啟示被召來了，和交叉核實後從所有這些資源，是可蘭經編制。 No other religion has preserved revelation from God as Islam has!沒有任何其他宗教保留了神的啟示伊斯蘭教！
This is the essential difference (missed by many Christians) between what is the strength of Islam and the weakness of other religions.這是本質上的區別（錯過了許多基督徒）之間是什麼力量對伊斯蘭教和其他宗教的弱點。 Islam has a strong “CHAIN of NARRATION” for every document.伊斯蘭教具有強烈的“鏈條的敘事”的每一份文件。 No other religion on the face of the earth has such a verification process.沒有任何其他宗教的面對地球這樣的核查程序。 We KNOW who each of the people were in that committee which compiled the Qur'an, we know their antecedents and their lifestyles.我們知道誰的每個人在該委員會的編制的古蘭經，我們知道他們的前因和他們的生活方式。 We know the opinions of their contemporaries about them, they lived their lives in the full light of history to be verified by posterity.我們知道他們的意見對他們的同時代人，他們住在自己的生命充滿光的歷史，被後人驗證。
The same is true for the Hadith (sayings and actions of the Holy Prophet (SAW)).同樣是真實的聖訓（說法和行動的聖先知（鋸））。 When Imam Bukhari wrote his famous treatise on Hadith (it was not the first by any means), and when he quotes a saying from the Prophet (SAW), there is a chain of narrators of each saying right upto the Prophet (SAW)… “So-and-so heard from so-and-so heard from so-and-so that the Holy Prophet (SAW) said… “.當伊瑪目布哈里說他著名的論文於聖訓（這不是第一次以任何方式），而當他引述說，從先知（鋸），有一個連鎖的敘述者說，每個權利 upto先知（鋸）... “某某聽到某某聽到某某某，讓神聖的先知（鋸）說 ...”。 We know who each of these people in the chain were, we know if they really met the people they claimed to have narrated from, we know if they were truthful or not, we know if they were forgetful or not, we know who were their teachers and we know what their contemporaries and teachers thought of them.我們知道誰是這些人在每一個鏈的，我們知道他們是否真的符合人們他們聲稱已經從敘述，我們知道它們是否是真實與否，我們知道他們是健忘的，或沒有，我們知道誰是他們的老師，我們知道他們的同時代和老師認為他們。
All this is made possible by the science of “Asma-war-Rijaal”, and thousands of scholars over hundreds of years dedicated their lives to this science.所有這一切成為可能，科學的“阿斯瑪，戰爭 Rijaal”，和數百數千名學者多年來獻身於這門科學。 They painstakingly compiled biographies of each and every narrator of the Hadith and analyzed and debated them under a microscope, leaving out no detail of their life.他們精心編制的傳記，每一個敘述者的聖訓，分析和討論他們在顯微鏡下，離開了他們生活的任何細節。 The lives of 500,000 narrators were compiled this way.解說員的生活編纂了50萬這樣。 And all for verifying what ONE man, our beloved Prophet (may peace and blessings of Allah (SWT) be upon him) had said or did.和所有驗證一個人是什麼，我們敬愛的先知（願真主和平與祝福（SWT）的是他）曾說過一樣。 The masters of Hadith travelled thousands of miles to collect one saying and to verify one chain of narration from him.當家作主的聖訓數千英里前往收集一說，並核實 1鏈從他的敘述。
In contrast now lets take Christianity, do we know who Mark was?現在可以採取相反的基督教，我們知道誰是馬克？ Do we know who taught him about Isa – Jesus (PBUH)?我們知道誰教他對伊薩 - 耶穌（願他平安無恙）？ Do we know anything about his character or truthfulness or piety or his forgetfulness and grasp of reality?我們是否知道他的性格或真或虔誠或他的健忘和把握現實？ Wait, do we even know his last name?等等，我們甚至不知道他的姓？ No!不！ And is this what we are supposed to base our ultimate salvation on?而這是我們都應該立足我們的最終得救嗎？
Index of Abbreviations-索引的縮寫，
SAW- Sallallahu 'alayhi wa-sallam: Peace and blessings of Allah (SWT) be upon him SAW的Sallallahu'alayhi佤-薩拉姆：和平與祝福真主（SWT）的時，他
PBUH – Peace be upon Him願他平安無恙 - 願他安息
I apologize if I hurt someone's feelings with this, but the issue is larger than our feelings, it is salvation itself.我很抱歉，如果我傷害了別人的感覺，這一點，但問題是大於我們的感情，這是拯救自己。
Peace和平
Your brother in humanity,你哥哥在人類，
Tariq塔里克