É well-known que o “Christianity” de hoje tem origens dubious, que ironically não vem de Jesus, paz seja em cima dele (embora a estrutura inteira lhe é atribuída), mas de Paul da parte posterioa do esqueleto, a que pode direita ser consultado como “esse apostle de Satanic”. Para ele era Paul que colocou as fundações religiosas do Christianity de hoje, doutrinas baseadas no idolatry e pensamento filosófico do império Greco-Roman naquele tempo.
O seguinte vídeo perto Sheikh Khalid Yasin de New York sumaria a essência da religião Christian em cinco minutos. Este vídeo é hospedado em Escape vivo.
Subscribe
Subscribe Articles With
Bloglines, Google Reader, My MSN, Netvibes, Newsburst
Newsgator, Odeo, Pluck, Podnova, Rojo, My Yahoo!, Desktop Reader
By Month
Most Popular Articles
- The Authentic Gospel of Jesus: Evidence That Demands Christians Rethink Their Faith
- The Consensus on Homosexuality and The Illiteracy of Christian Polemicists
- Missionary Activity in Kosovo and the Causes of Muslim Conversions
- Learning Christianity in five minutes
- Response To "Muhammad as Al-Amin (the Trustworthy): How His Enemies Really Viewed Him" And The Christian Missionaries
- An Eye-Opening Biblical Narration
- Another Rational Approach to the Prophethood of Muhammad (P)
Denis Giron dito sobre 7 novembro 2007:
Isto golpeou-me como sendo exceedingly duro de fazer exame seriamente.
Por exemplo, uma premissa de seu argumento parece ser aquela se um livro for compilado 40 ou mais anos após a época de Jesus, então esse livro não é um texto de confiança. Não era a data tradicional para a composição para o Qur' (significativamente) uns mais de 40 anos após o tempo de Jesus? Sr. Yasin seja disposto admitir que este é um argumento pobre? Ou preferiria a meramente especial plead em nome do Qur'?
Que é este bocado sobre últimos nomes? Cada homem no planeta mesmo hoje, no século XXI, tem um primeiro e último nome? And what is that bit about all the Church Fathers agreeing that, perhaps, these were just pen name, because no man would only put his first name and “according to”? I am very confident that Mr. Yasin would not be able to list even one Church Father who stated such, unless he drastically altered the meaning of “Church Father”.
And what serious authority, whether or Christian or not, actually believes that Paul authored all the books from Acts to the end of the New Testament? I cannot think of a single scholar, whether Christian or secular, who believes that Paul authored either of the two epistles attributed to Peter, the three epistles attributed to John, the epistles attributed to James, the epistle attributed to Jude, much less the Apocalypse attributed to John.
He seems intent on setting up a dichotomy between what Jesus said, and what is said about Jesus in the New Testament. What is his methodology for separating the two? And, as he went through the litany of things those authors said about Jesus, why did he not include the virgin birth? Does the same sort of insinuated reasoning not apply?
In short, and with all due respect to Mr. Yasin, I found this video to be filled with quite a few errors and instances of poor reasoning.
Musa said on 5 December 2007:
Assalamu ‘alaykum
I send to you two little debates about Jesus and his alleged divinity
http://www.dailymotion.com/ivo.....s-god_news
http://www.dailymotion.com/ivo.....ion_events
I think, it’s interesting
Bassam Zawadi said on 18 February 2008:
that khalid yasin speech left 22 australians converting to islam http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....re=related