<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Hijab and The Muslim Woman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2007/the-hijab-and-the-muslim-woman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2007/the-hijab-and-the-muslim-woman/</link>
	<description>The purpose of this website is to facilitate Muslim responses to the various mendacious polemics and distortions of Islam by the Christian missionaries and their anti-Islamic allies that are being spread over the Internet.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: afzal</title>
		<link>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2007/the-hijab-and-the-muslim-woman/#comment-32089</link>
		<dc:creator>afzal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2007/the-hijab-and-the-muslim-woman/#comment-32089</guid>
		<description>hello,

the so-called 'injunction' is of course the fuqaha's construct of the texts. the same fuqaha who say that the non-free muslims girl's hair is NOT subject to being covered.

the supporters of the hijab (surely you wouldn't want women to wear it compulsorily) are on to a loser right from the start: the word 'hijab' means a 'curtain.' this is specifically used for the wives of the prophet speaking etc behind it. it doesn't mean headcover. the word for headcover is 'khimar' that u use the word 'hijab' to mean headcover ought to send alarms ringing -, yes khimar something which the men wore too. that the muslim women should cover using THEIR khimars - means that it was something already in vogue -it's not a new 'injunction'. the point is being free from molestation. that's is the maqsid of the shar'. why not apply islam for today?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span name="Konabody">hello,</p>
<p>the so-called &#8216;injunction&#8217; is of course the fuqaha&#8217;s construct of the texts. the same fuqaha who say that the non-free muslims girl&#8217;s hair is NOT subject to being covered.</p>
<p>the supporters of the hijab (surely you wouldn&#8217;t want women to wear it compulsorily) are on to a loser right from the start: the word &#8216;hijab&#8217; means a &#8216;curtain.&#8217; this is specifically used for the wives of the prophet speaking etc behind it. it doesn&#8217;t mean headcover. the word for headcover is &#8216;khimar&#8217; that u use the word &#8216;hijab&#8217; to mean headcover ought to send alarms ringing -, yes khimar something which the men wore too. that the muslim women should cover using THEIR khimars - means that it was something already in vogue -it&#8217;s not a new &#8216;injunction&#8217;. the point is being free from molestation. that&#8217;s is the maqsid of the shar&#8217;. why not apply islam for today?</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hijab</title>
		<link>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2007/the-hijab-and-the-muslim-woman/#comment-32080</link>
		<dc:creator>hijab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2007/the-hijab-and-the-muslim-woman/#comment-32080</guid>
		<description>Everyone has a right to dress the way they want so if a Muslim woman wants to wear a &lt;a href="http://www.muslimbase.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;hijab&lt;/a&gt; she should be able to</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span name="Konabody">Everyone has a right to dress the way they want so if a Muslim woman wants to wear a <a href="http://www.muslimbase.com/" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.muslimbase.com');">hijab</a> she should be able to</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
