私は-私がTalibanによって捕獲されたまで圧迫された創造物としてベールで覆われた女性を見るのが常であった。 2001年9月では、15日後米国のテロリストの攻撃、head-to-toe青で覆われたアフガニスタンへのIのsnuck burqa、抑圧的政権の下で生命の新聞記述を書くように意図する。 その代り、私は10日間発見され、阻止され、そして引き留められた。 私は私の捕獲者で吐き、誓った; 彼らは私を「悪い」女性と電話したが、私がQurを」読み、イスラム教を調査すると約束した後私を行く許可しなさい。 ロンドンの背部家、私は私が発見したものをによって私の単語を-保ち、驚かせられた。 あなたの妻を打ちあなたの娘を圧迫するQurのの代りに」方法のanic章私は道を女性の解放を促進することを見つけた。 私はイスラム教に後で2つの1/2年変えた。 今度は私は嫌気および狼狽と外務次官のジャックの前のわらがイスラム教を記述すると同時に見る niqab -彼の防衛に跳躍している総理大臣、Salman Rushdie作家およびイタリアの総理大臣のロマノProdiとのトニー・ブレアー統合に-障壁として…目だけ、明らかにする表面ベール。 あってベールの両側で、私は幼い花嫁、陰核切除、名誉の殺害および強制結婚をイスラム教の責任にするとき述べていることが西部のオスの政治家はおよびジャーナリストがわからないように言ってもいい。 Qurの注意深い読書は」ちょうどすべてについて70年代にの間戦った西部の男女同権主義者が精神性、教育および価値の人と等しい考慮されるイスラム教の女性へ前に利用できる1,400年だったことを示す、. いつイスラム教女性を、西部の人はなぜイスラム教の女性の装いによってそう取りつかれているそんなに提供するか。 Gordon BrownおよびジョンReidイギリスの政府大臣はについての軽蔑の注目をした niqabそれらがスコットランドから、メンズウェアのスカート呼び。 私がheadscarfを身に着け始めたときに私は二等市民になった。 私の前の乗客を離れて低下の後の1つのcabbieは、私が彼の窓で叩いたときにまぶしく光ったり、走り去った。 ビン・ラディンの隠れることがか」。あるところで別の言われて後部席に、「爆弾を」頼まれて、「残さないし、
はい、それは適度に服を着るイスラム教の女性のための宗教義務私が身に着けていることのように知っているイスラム教の女性の大半であるが hijab, which leaves the face uncovered. My dress tells you that I am a Muslim and I expect to be treated respectfully, much as a banker would say a business suit defines him as an executive to be taken seriously.
Some young Muslim feminists consider the hijab and niqab political symbols too, a way of rejecting Western excesses such as binge drinking, casual sex and drug use. Which is more liberating: being judged on the length of your skirt and size of your breasts, or on your character and intelligence? In Islam, superiority is achieved through piety, not beauty, wealth, power or sex. Italy’s Prodi joined the debate last week by declaring that it is “common sense” not to wear the niqab because it makes social relations “more difficult.” Nonsense. If this were the case, why are cell phones, e-mail, text messaging and fax machines in daily use? Islam tells me that I have a right to an education and a duty to seek knowledge, regardless of whether I am single or married. If a man raises a finger against his wife, he is not allowed to leave a mark on her body, which is the Qur’an’s way of saying, “Don’t beat your wife, stupid.” According to a recent National Domestic Violence Hotline survey, an average 4 million American women experience a serious assault by a partner each year; more than three women are killed by their husband or boy-friend every day; and one in three women around the world has been beaten, coerced into sex or otherwise abused. This problem transcends religion, wealth, class, race and culture. But it is true that Western men still believe they are superior to women and receive better pay for equal work. For those who still claim Islam oppresses women, recall this 1992 statement from the Rev. Pat Robertson: Feminism is a “socialist, anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians.” Now you tell me, who is civilized and who is not? Yvonne Ridley is political editor of Islam Channel TV in London and co-author of In the Hand of the Taliban: Her Extraordinary Story (Robson Books).
Subscribe
Subscribe Articles With
Bloglines, Google Reader, My MSN, Netvibes, Newsburst
Newsgator, Odeo, Pluck, Podnova, Rojo, My Yahoo!, Desktop Reader
Richard Chin said on 1 January 2007:
Then why the Taliban forbid women/girls from going to school? If it was so liberating, what are you afraid the girls will learn in school? Why is Islam so afraid of a womans face, figure or physical appearance. Your enthusiasm to your new religion is good, but please do not be clouded by it. You are most likely suffering from “Stockholm Syndrome”. You were caught and almost killed. Just think.
Ahyad nawi said on 3 January 2007:
Dear Robert,
You asked a question on why is it that the Taliban forbid women/girls go to school? Did you ever ask why is it that the Muslim government of Malaysia encourages its female population to get the highest and the best education? Why is it that the Malaysian government does not emulate the Taliban if you had described that the Taliban practices the true teachings of Islam. Thats why you need to get your historical facts and your in depth knowledge of Islam right before you judge whether something done by somebody represents the true teachings of Islam just because he or she profess that religion.
The women in Afghanistan were tradionally oppressed not due to religion but due to customary or tribal laws ( which are sometimes totally outdated and against the Islamic teachings )that were brought down from their tribal ancestors.To the Talibans , the non islamic customs or traditions are as divine as the chinese belief that wearing black on CNY would bring bad luck or taking a bath after delivering a baby is a taboo.
Women in Afghanistan are oppressed not by Islam but by culture and traditions which are very much against the tenets of Islam. The oppression is similar to the oppression on the blacks and the coloured in South Africa under the Apartheid system. The women in China, Vietnam, Thailand, Cambodia and the Philippines are also discreetly oppressed to the extent that they are sold to prostitution rings guised under match making syndicates and job opportunities at the age of puberty and all of this is due to women being the weaker gender by men’s defination of women.
Islam has define roles for men and roles for women .The Quran has never specify that men are more superior that women or vice versa. Because of their physical differences, men and women have definite roles .Any Muslim who deny the men and the women from his or her role would be committing a great sin. This defination of roles are as crystal as defining the role of a donkey and the role of a human unless you are also fighting for the donkey’s right to equality and in this case you want all humans to snort and shit like a donkey so that the donkey would feel that it has been treated equally.
Let me give you an example of oppression in the Chinese custom. A chinese is not allowed to practice polygamy but it is an opened secret that many Chinese men has more that one wife. These ladies are often referred to as mistress or mistresses in many cases the Chineses man ,especially the wealthy ones, keeps more than one in his private illegitimate collection.
Being illegitimate, the mistresses and the children out of this illegitimacy are as good as beggars on the street when the illegitimate husband dies. His lawful wife has all rights to his inheritence and cannot be challenged in any court. Is this not an oppression to the other wives and children, if any and this not a question of the other wives taking risk but whether a women is protected by her religion. In the Chinese religion it is not but in Islam, it is and this is just one of the many many ways Islam upholds women’s right 1,400 years ago. A Chinese man can just leave his illegitimate wife and his children without any alimony or financial support but the Muslim men is subject to a lot of conditions after divorcing any one of his four wives. Even in marriage Islam demands equal treatment in every way amongst the wives and if the would be husband is not capable of committing to this arrangement then the husband must maintain only one wife whichever way it goes.
On dressing, you also have to know that the Muslim males also has to maintain his “Aurat ” just as in women. For male muslims, his aurat runs from the belly button right down to the ankle and this part of the body cannot be seen by the opposite gender. By the way , are you the type that does not mind having your daughter or wife to walk around the streets with just a little star covering her voluptious breast nipples with a small pink panties just good enough to cover that little pink XXXXX in between her legs. Are you the type that does not get angry when your wife and daughter or mother starts making whore like lewd movements at the cheers of the enthusiastic male public while walking down the street . If not, then why are you so against women who lives up to her modesty and dignity or are you the type that wants woment to dress in the way you think fit?
If you had ever been to a University in the United States, you can practically see how the girls are clamouring to be popular, most liked, most beautiful and in doing so, they degraded themselves with the most revealing outfit , heavy make ups and free and easy lifestyle so as to be hip and to be accepted. They have created a traditional culture where girls who do not reveal their essentials are considered geeks and outcasted pariahs and licensed obtained to reject these geeks in the sorority house. Any girls who are modestly dressed ( muslims included ) are made fun of not just in schools but even in national television.
By the way, you are already a geek in U.S if you are a average Chinese from Malaysia but you can still befriend a white American but rest assured, he or she would also be either a geek, fat and ugly girl, a black girl or other non white race.
shazlee shah said on 30 May 2007:
assalamualaikum.amazing article.
just for my understanding,may i know which verse of quran that you explored about the women’s right?just thinking that i should know that too.thanks madm.and if u could,pls mail me.