マレーシアのキリスト教の起源そしてイスラム教


2008年2月1日

Bismika Allahuma

次はキリスト教、創設者およびエグゼクティブ編集者が付いているマレーシアのイスラム教の状態と同様、宗教の宣教師改宗の問題のビデオダイアログ(部Iおよび部II)のである Bismika Allahuma, MENJ. 彼はキリスト教、中心の宣教師の起源を論議する 存在理由 聖書のに関してマレーシアのイスラム教の権限の無感動の非難と同様、イスラム教の固まりを、欺くために販売の熱心そして方法の後ろ daの」 wah (人々へのイスラム教の伝播の)努力一般に。

私達は蓄積したようにビデオを楽しむことを望む 注意 ローカルblogosphere。

部I

部II

ビデオはsourced礼儀をのある Googleのビデオ.

「キリスト教の起源への5つの応答およびマレーシアのイスラム教」

  1. アダム 言われる 2008年2月2日:

    ポールはキリスト教の創設者ではない。 イエス・キリストは復活させた主ある!

    アラーは神のアラビア部門の名前である。 YHWHは彼自身の名前である。

    要求前の調査の歴史。

    「イスラム教完全であり、どこにそのような主張のためのサポートがある」は完全か。

    神は賛美する

  2. indianman 言われる 2008年2月4日:

    YHWHは彼自身の名前である

    yhwhが彼自身の名前なら、なぜユダヤ人に聞こえ、なぜヘブライアルファベットを使用するか。 if yhwh is supposed to be a universal god then why the obsession with israel? why yhwh incarnated in jew form for the jews? why kill innocent non-jews for the crimes of other non-jews? why allow jews to grow up and do WORSER crimes than non-jews in israel (read book of kings)? why this sadist plan to get his own “choosen ones” to get him nailed on a cross?

  3. Taufiq said on 11 February 2008:

    Adam,

    I suggest you to go back to your Christianity classes; even better seek for an Islamic class :-)

    When I was an undergraduate, I took a Christianity class called “The Origin of Christianity and the New Testaments”. In the class, there were quite a few Muslim student who took it as an elective. The Bible was one of our reference book used throughout the semester. My theological professor, who was a devoted and pious Christian, surprisingly made a remark in his introduction of the class that he admitted there were some chapters/verses in the Bible contradicting with each other, but he said just accepted them for the sake of the class.

    It was a fun class as we treated it just like any other history classes. So we learned the origion of Christianity. Jesus (pbuh) was never the founder of what Christianity is today. It was Paul, who was a shrewd jew, invented Christianity because he wanted people to deviate from the actual teachings of Jesus (pbuh), because he found out Jesus (pbuh) teachings can never benefit him. It took him years to persuade people of his own to embrace his “Chistianity”. His collections of letters, which he had written to Rome etc., later became what nowadays people acknowledge it as the New Testaments or the Bible (read: these were what we used as reference in our class).

    The above just a summary. Do research and read dude before making any remarks (Read 3x).

    p/s: Your name is a very good name, like our prophet Adam (pbuh). I ask Allah to show you lights to embrace Islam, the way of life. Amin.

  4. Qasim said on 22 February 2008:

    An interesting talk. I don’t agree with all of the arguments and statements

    1. Paul as founder of Christianity. Paul was not the founder of Christianity, though it is true that the type of Christianity which he represented ultimately became predominant. Notice that in his epistles Paul cites traditions which were handed down from Christians prior to him. Paul did not invent the claim that Jesus (P) was raised from the dead, for example. Paul inherited certain beliefs concerning Jesus (P) from those who were Christians before him and Paul later added some of his own emphasis upon it.

    2. Gospel of Barnabas. There is no scholar worth the name who regards this gospel to be authentic. This is a mideval forgery.

  5. Wayfarer said on 16 April 2008:

    MENJ (or someone qualified), would u like to respond to http://vwfs68.blogspot.com/200.....-and.html? Or is http://islamic-awareness.org (more than) enough? Something concise & hope that vwfs68 isn’t put-off with. Jazakallah khaira - wassalam

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.