ل أنّ الذي يكون [فميلير ويث] المتطرفة [إيسلموفوبيك] موقعة يدعى "[فيثفريدوم] دوليّة", الاسم من مؤسسته علي [سنا] (اسم مستعار) مرادفة مع التعصب وبلاغة حقيرة غالبا يعرض ضدّ [موسليم] وإسلام. هذا كان شخص الذي علانيّة دافع للقنبلة ذرّيّة أن يكون استعملت على السّكان مسلمة ويتلقّى كثير أوقات أفاد أنّ هو إرادة "منديل خارجا" إسلام ضمن 30 سنون. الآن قد تحرّك هذا رقم مجهولة نسبيّا ضمن دوائر أكاديميّة - [أبرت فروم] يصبح البطلة [سلف-بّوينتد] للسبب من [إيسلموفوبيا], تعصب والجديدة [إمرجنغ] مدرسة من [ل-بيوبل] و [بسودو-سكهولرس] - إلى ما بعد العالم أنّ هو أكثر عوّدت مع على الإنترنت.

أحيانا, يتصادف نحن مسيحيات وجها لوجه و, أكثر غالبا, على الإنترنت, الذي, عندما يعلم أنّ النص من البشائر تحمّل فساد أثناء عمليّت بثّهم, غالبا تجاوبت مع النوع تالي أسئلة: "متى? الذي أتمّ الفساد? في ما بلد? [بفور ور فتر] [موهمّد]? لماذا كان هو أتمّت? [هوو كم] لا أحد لاحظ هو?" يكشف هذا نوع من على ما يبدو "بريئة" أسئلة فقط الحالة جهل ضخمة [إينكلكلبلي] من الشخص في سؤال. لا يبدو مسيحيات الذي يطرح هذا أسئلة أن يحقّق كيف تماما حمقاء هم [كم كروسّ تو] أيّ شخص الذي يكون [فميلير ويث] على الأقلّ الأسس جدّا من نقد نصّيّة. لذلك, ينجح ال [قوسأيشنر] فقيرة فقط داخل على يهين [نو ون لس] غير أنّ بنفسي. مسيحية يحتاج مدافعات ومبشرات أن يتوقّف يطرح هذا متروكة, أسئلة حمقاء بما أنّ هو يعكس الى حدّ بعيد على نحو رديء على ذكاءهم ويعطي أخرى إنطباع سيّئة جدّا من هم.

في مادة أخيرة داخل المشاهدة يأخذ مجلة في ال [أوك], الزعيمة إنجيليّة باتريك [سوكهديو] صفعة في [موسليم] ودينهم. حالته يقف حتّى تدقيق? باتريك [سوكهديو] مادة (يوليو-تمّوز 30, 2005) في لندن المشاهدة, "يعكس الأسطورة من إسلام معتدلة" اتّجاه خطرة في الحرب على ذعر. تحت المظهر من يعلم [وسترنرس] حول إسلام, [سبردينغ] هو [إين فكت] ال جدّا نفسه تضليل أنّ جدل [أنتي-يسلميك] يتلقّى يكون أسّست فوق ل على 1,000 سنون. هذا يلعب مباشرة داخل الأيادي من [أسما] خانة مثقّل ب, أبو [موسب] [أل-زرقوي] وأخرى, لأنّ يشجّع هو ال "صدام الحضارات" هم هكذا [أبّلّينغلي] ب رغب. It is indeed of the utmost importance that we learn more about Islam and fight the scourge of extremism with all the tools possible. But Sookhdeo and those like him corrupt this process, seeking to advance their own agenda by turning the war on terror into an ideological war against Islam.

This short movie was made in less than twenty four hours in response to Geert Wilders’s anti-Islam polemical movie, entitled “Fitna”. The six-minute video called “Schism” by 33-year-old Saudi blogger Raid Al-Saeed takes violent Biblical texts and intersperses them with fiery rants by a Christian fundamentalist youth leader in Texas. Kudos goes to the Muslim brother who directed the video. This is the kind of “response” that is needed from Muslims, an intellectual response and not one which is based on emotion.

It has become a habit for some to publish responses to any paper dealing with the issue of Islam, its truthfulness and the falsehood of other religions. This is particularly true of the Christian missionaries as such people do not care whether they provide an efficient responses or not; all they care about is to respond, regardless of the outcome. Is this reaction an idiotic one? Well, we cannot claim that it is a stupid strategy; because it is always useful to show your followers that you are able to respond and speak loudly, drowning other voices. The psychological factor is after all always important here. But what is glaring indeed are the content of such “responses” because the writer tries to show that he is competent in the field when in actual fact he is totally unqualified.

After the last war in Kosovo, the overall economic situation of the country has deteriorated in a drastic way. As is well-known, the end of war meant that Kosovo became a target for many Christian organizations, a phenomenon which seems to accompany every war-emerging country nowadays. The same happened to post-communist Albania, as well as Bosnia, Rwanda and several other countries in the world involved in different conflicts. Needless to mention, great poverty is a gate to disbelief, as man is continuously in search for the provision granted to him by the Almighty and frustration seems to cause all kinds of incongruent decisions. In order to elucidate the bitter reality in Kosovo, we are presenting the case of the conversion of an entire Muslim family to Christianity.

Among the most laughable arguments of Christian missionaries and atheists is their argument to show that Islam does not prohibit homosexuality and that it is permissible in Islam. This is indeed an ideal example of how ignorance and incompetence can make a person become a joke before his opponents. In order to dispel the Islamic illiteracy of these types of people, we are providing an educational guide to those who ignore that homosexuality is utterly prohibited and given the capital punishment in Islam.

The Islamic revival symbolized by the current resurgence of the hijab is often considered as an attempt of Arab Muslims to restore their pride and identity which have been repeatedly undermined by colonization and economic retardation. Man has always had a conservative tendency and reacts against which is new and unfamiliar without realizing whether it is good or bad for him. Some people still think the Muslim women insist on wearing hijab which is the “very symbol of the oppressed situation because they are enslaved by the tradition and are not sufficiently aware of their lamentable situation. “If only”, they probably think, “the movement of the women’s liberation and independence awakes those women’s mind, they will take away the hijab.”