The Christian missionaries tend to make the general conclusion that the Qur'an cannot be a text of divine origin because of the unacceptable meanings included in it.Perhaps they are correct in this conclusion and we may be inclined to agree with them due to the following reasons. Kristīgie misionāri mēdz izdarīt vispārēju secinājumu, ka Qur'an nevar tekstu dievišķo izcelsmi, jo nepieņemamas nozīmēm iekļauti it.Perhaps tie ir pareizi šo secinājumu, un mēs varam būt tiecas vienoties ar viņiem, jo šādas iemeslu dēļ.

In response to our argument that Paul's fumbling of the Epimenides paradox is proof that the ad-hoc “apostle” was not inspired after all, one Christian has raised an objection. Atbildot uz mūsu argumentu, ka Paul's fumbling no Epimenides paradokss ir pierādījums tam, ka ad-hoc "apustulis" nebija iedvesmoja galu galā, viena Christian ir izteikusi iebildumus. The attempted rebuttal acknowledges the paradoxical nature of Epimenides' statement, but then makes the bizarre claim that Paul's statement is true nonetheless due to other elements attributed to the Cretan “prophet” by the “apostle”. Mēģinājums atspēkojums atzīst paradoksālo raksturu Epimenides "paziņojumu, bet tad liek ekscentrisks apgalvojumu, ka Pāvila apgalvojums ir patiess, tomēr sakarā ar citiem elementiem attiecināmi uz Krētas" pravietis "ar" apustulis ".