<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bismika Allahuma &#187; Biblical Commentary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/biblical-commentary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org</link>
	<description>The purpose of this website is to facilitate Muslim responses to the various mendacious polemics and distortions of Islam by the Christian missionaries and their anti-Islamic allies that are being spread over the Internet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:34:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>The Authentic Gospel of Jesus: Evidence That Demands Christians Rethink Their Faith</title>
		<link>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2007/the-authentic-gospel-of-jesus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2007/the-authentic-gospel-of-jesus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblical Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2007/the-authentic-gospel-of-jesus-evidence-that-demands-christians-rethink-their-faith/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Instead of writing a full-scale biography of Jesus of Nazareth, I want to focus on some aspects of the life and teaching of Jesus of Nazareth that are commonly overlooked by most  Christians. Any attempt to reconstruct the historical Jesus (as distinct from the incarnate deity of ecclesiastical faith) needs to take into account all the recoverable data about Jesus,  much of which has been ignored by many Christians because of its' embarrassment to Christian orthodoxy. Jesus' reported sayings in the Gospels are frequently subjected to tortuous exegesis by fundamentalist Christians to make them fit later church tradition. Paradoxically, the data has been critically examined by none other than Christian scholars themselves....<a href="http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2007/the-authentic-gospel-of-jesus/">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2007/the-authentic-gospel-of-jesus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sign of Emmanuel</title>
		<link>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2007/the-sign-of-emmanuel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2007/the-sign-of-emmanuel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 06:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblical Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2007/the-sign-of-emmanuel/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The authors of the New Testament have often quoted passages from the Old Testament, claiming such statements to be prophecies fulfilled in the person of Jesus Christ. The number of such quoted passages is actually very high. Among the evangelists, Matthew is the one having made this phenomenon characteristic to his Gospel. The prophecy carries a very important place in the Christian theology. Every Christian knows about the prophecies of the books of Psalms, Isaiah, and Daniel related to the childhood, life, mission, and death of Jesus. To every Christian, these prophecies are the clear evidence of the truth of Gospels and mission of Jesus in general. The problem is that according to the Bible, there exists true prophecies as well as false ones. Hence the question arises on the necessary criteria to distinguish a false prophecy from a true one....<a href="http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2007/the-sign-of-emmanuel/">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2007/the-sign-of-emmanuel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homosexuality in the Bible</title>
		<link>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2006/homosexuality-in-the-bible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2006/homosexuality-in-the-bible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 17:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblical Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/index.php/articles/homosexuality-in-the-bible</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bible endorses homosexual behaviour and we shall provide one such example which is exemplified in the story of the relationship between Daniel and the prince of the eunuchs.

The verse is:

<blockquote><em>"Vayiten ha-Elohim et-Daniyel leKHesed u'leraKHamim lifnei sar hasarisim"</em> (Daniel 1:9)</blockquote>

[i.e., "Now God had brought Daniel into favor and tender love with the prince of the eunuchs" (KJV).]

The Hebrew words, which describe the relationship between Daniel and the prince of the Eunuchs, are <em>"KHesed"</em> and <em>"RaHamim"</em>....<a href="http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2006/homosexuality-in-the-bible/">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2006/homosexuality-in-the-bible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ignored Teachings in the New Testament?</title>
		<link>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/ignored-teachings-in-the-new-testament/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/ignored-teachings-in-the-new-testament/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblical Commentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/bismika/?p=213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi While there are so many Old Testament laws which are ignored by Christians, here are a number of New Testament writings which are also ignored. Do Christians believe only what they want to believe, despite being &#8230;...<a href="http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/ignored-teachings-in-the-new-testament/">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/ignored-teachings-in-the-new-testament/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bible Commentary on John 10:36</title>
		<link>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/bible-commentary-on-john-1036/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/bible-commentary-on-john-1036/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblical Commentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/bismika/?p=212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi In John 10:36, we read the following words of Jesus: &#8220;Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God?&#8221; The &#8230;...<a href="http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/bible-commentary-on-john-1036/">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/bible-commentary-on-john-1036/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Observation of Answering Islam&#8217;s Response to &#8220;I AM WHAT I AM: A Bible Commentary&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/observation-of-answering-islam-response-to-i-am-what-i-am-a-bible-commentary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/observation-of-answering-islam-response-to-i-am-what-i-am-a-bible-commentary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblical Commentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/bismika/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tera Tak Adamar &#038; Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi The missionary Sam Shamoun under the banner of the infamous missionary website, Answering Islam, have claimed in his series of articles [1][2][3][4] that he has &#8220;refuted&#8221; our analysis of John 8:28 regarding &#8230;...<a href="http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/observation-of-answering-islam-response-to-i-am-what-i-am-a-bible-commentary/">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/observation-of-answering-islam-response-to-i-am-what-i-am-a-bible-commentary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John 8 and the Birth of Jesus</title>
		<link>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/john-8-and-the-birth-of-jesus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/john-8-and-the-birth-of-jesus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblical Commentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/bismika/?p=210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Asif Iqbal Following are some observations on the curious account of the birth of Jesus which a careful study of the Gospels reveal: In John 8:31 ff., there is a debate between Jesus and the Jews about their descent from &#8230;...<a href="http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/john-8-and-the-birth-of-jesus/">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/john-8-and-the-birth-of-jesus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Luke 6:1: Its Corrupted &amp; Actual Understanding</title>
		<link>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/luke-61-its-corrupted-actual-understanding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/luke-61-its-corrupted-actual-understanding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblical Commentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/bismika/?p=209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Asif Iqbal That the text of the New Testament, as we have it today, is loaded with textual corruptions and misreadings is an acknowledged fact among the NT scholars (cf., e.g., Metzger, Oxford. 1987, ch., vii). Once in a while &#8230;...<a href="http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/luke-61-its-corrupted-actual-understanding/">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/luke-61-its-corrupted-actual-understanding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Vain Repetitions&quot; in Prayer? Exegesis on Matthew 6:7</title>
		<link>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/vain-repetitions-in-prayer-exegesis-on-matthew-67/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/vain-repetitions-in-prayer-exegesis-on-matthew-67/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblical Commentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/bismika/?p=208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi A Christian missionary wrote that: Jesus said: &#8220;And when you pray, do not use vain repetitions as the heathen do. For they think that they will be heard for their many words.&#8221; (Matt 6:7) Prove to &#8230;...<a href="http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/vain-repetitions-in-prayer-exegesis-on-matthew-67/">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/vain-repetitions-in-prayer-exegesis-on-matthew-67/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ezekiel 23 And Its Disgusting Language</title>
		<link>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/ezekiel-23-and-its-disgusting-language/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/ezekiel-23-and-its-disgusting-language/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblical Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book of Ezekiel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ezekiel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Testament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/bismika/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi &#8220;Does the Bible use language not fitting for God?&#8221; This was the question that a missionary rhetorically posed to his readers in an amusing but vain attempt to &#8220;defend&#8221; the inappropriate and unnatural language of Ezekiel &#8230;...<a href="http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/ezekiel-23-and-its-disgusting-language/">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/ezekiel-23-and-its-disgusting-language/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

