If you're new here, you may want to get regular updates via如果你是新這裡，你可能想通過定期更新 RSS feed RSS提要 . 。 Thank you for visiting!感謝您訪問！

Introduction 介紹

It is known that the enemies of據了解，敵人 Islam伊斯蘭教 , most especially the Christian missionaries, are unable to accept the reality of the Qur'an and its divine existence. ，最特別是基督教傳教士，無法接受現實的古蘭經和神聖的存在。 Hence, they try to make excuses and their frequent clarion of despair is that the Qur'an was “plagiarised” from Judeo-Christian sources.因此，他們試圖找藉口和頻繁響亮的絕望的是，古蘭經是“剽竊”從猶太教和基督教的來源。 This claim was repeated by Orientalists in the likes of Sale這項索賠是重複的東方學家喜歡銷售 ^{1 一} , Bell貝爾 ^{2 2} and Rodinson和羅丁森 ^{3 3} . 。 Needless to mention, these rabble did not provide any proof for these accusations.不用提，這些烏合之眾沒有提供任何證據對這些指控。 Their claims, however, are happily picked up by the Christian missionaries who are still living in the past.他們的說法，但是，高興地拿起一個由基督教傳教士誰仍然生活在過去。

Questions for the Critics 問題的批評

The following questions are adapted from下面的問題是改編自 Muhammad穆罕默德 Shabri Abd Madjid's Orientalis Barat Iri Hati Kebesaran Al-Quran Shabri阿卜杜勒馬吉德的側柏巴拉裡裡Hati Kebesaran鋁古蘭經 ^{4 4} For the benefit of our readers who do not habitually read the Malay language, we have hence loosely translated the relevant portion of this article:對於我們的讀者受益誰不經常閱讀馬來語言，我們都因而鬆散翻譯了這篇文章的相關部分：

Looking at the personality and the background of the life of Muhammad (P) from childhood until his death, it is easy to refute these baseless and illogical allegations with logical reasoning ( dalil aqli ) as follows:看個性和背景的生活穆罕默德（規劃）從童年到去世，很容易駁斥這些毫無根據的和不合邏輯的指控邏輯推理（ 教長aqli）如下：

Firstly, Muhammad (P) was known to be a truthful person ( al-Amin ) and this is acknowledged by both his friends and enemies.第一，穆罕默德（規劃）被稱為是一個真實的人（al - Amin的 ），這是既承認他的朋友和敵人。 Therefore it is impossible for him to lie or to be untruthful about his relevations.因此，他不可能說謊或將要對他relevations不真實。

Secondly, if it were true that Muhammad (P) was not honest and sincere in conveying his message, why did his closest friends and ardent followers obey him, much less adhere to his teachings, in the face of such opposition and difficulty during the earlier stages of his mission?第二，如果這是真的，穆罕默德（P）是不是誠實和真誠的傳達他的訊息，為什麼他最親密的朋友和熱心的追隨者服從他，更堅持他的教誨，在面對這種反對和困難，在較早階段，他的使命？

Thirdly, if it is true that Muhammad (P) had formed his own relevations from some Jewish or Christian teacher(s), then why is the name of that teacher(s) not mentioned in第三，如果這是真的，穆罕默德（規劃）已形成了自己relevations一些猶太人或基督徒教師（第），那麼為什麼，教師的名稱（第）沒有提及 history歷史 and known to all?和眾所周知的？

Fourthly, the Jews and Christians referred to as the 'People of the Book' by the Qur'an vehemently opposed, ridiculed and openly insulted Muhammad(P).第四，猶太人和基督徒稱為'人民的書'的古蘭經強烈反對，公然嘲笑和侮辱穆罕默德（規劃）。 They hid the knowledge contained within their scripture from Muhammad.他們躲在自己的知識包含在經文由穆罕默德。 How is it possible that at the same time, they were teaching Muhammad (P) their scripture?怎麼可能，在同一時間，他們的教學穆罕默德（規劃）的經文？

Lastly, Muhammad(P) was an illiterate, and hence how was he able to write a complete Book (al-Quran)?最後，穆罕默德（P）是一個文盲，所以他是如何能寫出一個完整的圖書（基地古蘭經）？

Conclusion 結論

It can be seen that to claim that the Qur'an was composed by a single Arab nomad, in this case Muhammad (P), who decided one day to reform his people's long-held pagan idol worshipping and other practices, is a theory that is, amusing as it may be, fabulous in its absurdity and does not stand up to the scrutiny.可以看出，聲稱古蘭經組成由一個阿拉伯游牧民族，在這種情況下，穆罕默德（規劃），誰決定有一天他的人民對改革的長期持有異教偶像崇拜和其他做法，是一種理論，即是有趣的，因為它可能是，在其神話般的荒誕，不站起來審議。

And only God knows best.而且，只有上帝知道最好的。

1. George Sale, Preliminary Discourse (1899) [喬治銷售， 初步話語 （1899）[ back背面 ] ]
2. Richard Bell, The Origin Of Islam and Its Christian Environment (1926) [理查德貝爾， 伊斯蘭教的起源與基督教的環境 （1926）[ back背面 ] ]
3. M. Rodinson, Mohammad (1977) [米羅丁森， 穆罕默德 （1977）[ back背面 ] ]
4. The online document of this text may be found在線文檔中的文本可能會發現這 here這裡 . 。 [ [ back背面 ] ]