Homosexuality in the Bible同性恋在圣经中

Tuesday 03 Jan, 2006星期二2006年1月3日

The Bible endorses homosexual behaviour and we shall provide one such example which is exemplified in the story of the relationship between Daniel and the prince of the eunuchs.圣经赞同同性恋行为,我们将提供一个这样的例子,是在丹尼尔之间的关系和对太监的故事就是一个例子。

The verse is:诗句是:

“Vayiten ha-Elohim et-Daniyel leKHesed u'leraKHamim lifnei sar hasarisim” (Daniel 1:9) “Vayiten公顷莹等,Daniyel leKHesed u'leraKHamim lifnei特区hasarisim”(但以理书1:9)

[ie, "Now God had brought Daniel into favor and tender love with the prince of the eunuchs" (KJV).] [即,“现在神使的青睐和怜悯与丹尼尔王子的太监”(和合本)。]

The Hebrew words, which describe the relationship between Daniel and the prince of the Eunuchs, are “KHesed” and “RaHamim” ….希伯来文的话,其中叙述了宦官关系的丹尼尔和王子,是“KHesed”“RaHamim”...。 Read More阅读更多

The Kung Controversy: An analysis of Jochen Katz's recent tirade倚天之争:一个约亨卡茨最近长篇大论分析

1 / 02 / 06 - Some time ago, MENJ published 1 / 02 / 06 -前一段时间,MENJ出版 Hans Kung's view汉斯昆的看法 of the Prophet Muhammad(P) along with a brief editor's note.的先知穆罕默德(规划)以及一个简短的按语。 It seems that Jochen Katz was quite outraged at this but more so at the "editor's note" and soon after看来,约亨卡茨在这很愤怒,但更在“编者的话”,所以,不久之后 published a "response"出版了“反应” . In short, Katz is saying that Kung only expressing his own personal opinion about the Prophet Muhammad(P).总之,卡茨说,成功是唯一的表达自己的关于先知穆罕默德(P)的个人意见。 and does not represent all Christians.并不能代表所有的基督徒。 He objects to the editor's following statement (underlined by Katz): ". . . Hans Kung conveys the Christian opinion on Prophet Muhammad (P)." Of course the editor did not argue that Hans Kung is representing all the Christians and has recently corrected his statement so that it now reads: "...Hans Kung conveys a Christian opinion on Prophet Muhammad(P)."他)对象编辑器的以下声明(强调卡茨:“。。。汉斯昆传达的P)基督教见先知穆罕默德 (。”当然,编辑器并没有说汉斯昆是代表所有的基督徒,并在最近更正他的语句,以便它现在读取:“...汉斯昆传达一个P)基督教先知穆罕默德的意见(。” Certainly, there is no one view among Christians regarding Prophet Muhammad(P) and so, just as Hans Kung does not speak for all Christians, Answering Islam certainly does not speak for all Christians....当然,没有,所以一)查看基督教徒之间关于先知穆罕默德(磷,就像汉斯昆并不代表所有的基督徒, 伊斯兰教回答当然不能代表所有的基督徒.... Read More阅读更多

Splitting Hairs, the "Jochen Katz" Way鸡蛋里挑骨头的“约亨卡茨”路

12 / 30 / 05 - Answering Islam has posted an early 12月30日/ 05 - 回答伊斯兰教早期发布 reaction反应 in objection to our publishing of在反对我们的出版 Han Kung on the Prophet Muhammad (P)韩绔嗯的先知穆罕默德(规划) . There are several issues in this reaction by Jochen Katz, the de facto dictator of Answering Islam , that needs to be corrected.有几个问题需要加以纠正这种反应由Jochen卡茨,需要事实上的 独裁者 回答伊斯兰教的。 We shall briefly respond to each of the allegations....我们将简要地回应了每一项指控.... Read More阅读更多

Some Notes On Sam Shamoun's Lowly Character萨姆Shamoun的低特征的若干注记

12 / 30 / 05 - Recently I came across email exchanges that took place between Jalal Abualrab and the Christian missionary Sam Shamoun. 12月30日/ 05 -最近,我偶然看到山姆Shamoun电子邮件交流传教士之间所发生贾拉尔Abualrab和基督教。 I have heard that the missionary Shamoun is a very abusive, malicious and nasty individual, constantly mocking and abusing Islam as his hobby.我听说传教士Shamoun是一个很侮辱,恶意和讨厌个人,不断嘲笑和滥用伊斯兰教作为他的业余爱好。 After reading the mail exchanges, it became clear to me that this missionary is indeed a very arrogant and abusive person.在阅读邮件交流,我清楚地认识到,这确实是一个非常传教士傲慢和虐待的人。 I was surprised to see that Katz, who generally maintains a polite tone, did not say a word to condemn Shamoun's abusive behaviour.我很惊讶地看到,卡茨,谁普遍保持礼貌的语气,没有说一个字谴责Shamoun的虐待行为。 In this paper I would like to comment upon the discussion and offer my own perspective, views and observations as a reader....在本文中,我想发表意见的讨论,并提供作为一个读者,我自己的观点,看法和意见.... Read More阅读更多

Islam and Christianity: Diatribe or Dialogue?伊斯兰教和基督教:谩骂或对话?

12 / 28 / 05 - This is not the place to review the history of Christian-Muslim relations. 12月28日/ 05 -这不是检讨的地方关系史上的基督徒和穆斯林。 This history may now be read in the erudite works of Norman Daniel.这段历史现在可能在阅读诺曼丹尼尔的精品。 The reading is sad and agonizing.阅读是悲伤和痛苦。 The conclusion which may be safely drawn from this history is that Christianity's involvement with the Muslim World was so full of misunderstanding, prejudice, and hostility that it has warped the Western Christian's will and consciousness.而可安全地从这段历史中得出的结论是,基督教与穆斯林世界的参与是如此的误解,偏见充分,和敌意,它已经扭曲了西方基督教的意志和意识。 "Would to God Christianity had never met Islam!" “上帝啊伊斯兰教基督教从来没有见过!” will reverberate in the mind of any student patient enough to peruse that history....将回荡在任何学生足够的耐心细读,历史记.... Read More阅读更多

Book Review of Bart Ehrman's "Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why"图书巴特陆国际律师事务所审查的“错误引述的做法耶稣:背后谁和为什么改变了圣经的故事”

12 / 26 / 05 - The book " 12月26日/ 05 -书“ Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible and Why错误引述的做法耶稣:背后谁以及为什么改变了圣经故事 " from Prof. Bart Ehrman can be described as an introduction to New Testament textual criticism for beginners, in which he explains the subject in the context of his own background, relating his journey from being an Evangelical Christian to becoming a world renowned New Testament scholar. Besides DC Parker's “从巴特教授陆国际律师事务所可以被描述为一个新约考证对于初学者来说,他在其中解释了他自己的背景情况介绍的主题,从一个有关他的基督教福音之旅成为著名学者的世界新约。此外直流帕克的 "Living Text of the Gospels" “生活的​​福音文本” , Ehrman's ,陆国际律师事务所的 "Misquoting Jesus" “错误引述的做法耶稣” seems to be the only book on textual criticism designed specifically for the non-expert readers....似乎是唯一的书上的考证设计的非专业读者特别.... Read More阅读更多