If you're new here, you may want to get regular updates via RSS feed.如果你是新這裡，您可能希望獲得定期更新RSS提要。 Thank you for visiting!Part A感謝您訪問！A部
Nadir Ahmed & Usman Sheikh謝赫艾哈邁德納迪爾和烏斯曼
First Composed: 18th July 2004.第一組：2004年7月18日。 Last Updated: 22nd July 2004最後更新：2004年7月22日
The following is our partial response to the tirade authored by the belligerent Christian missionary Sam Shamoun, to be found here.以下是我們部分回應撰寫長篇大論的交戰基督教傳教士薩姆薩姆，在這兒找到。 This article will clearly establish Prophet Muhammad(P) as本文將明確規定先知穆罕默德（規劃）為 Read more ..閱讀更多..

Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi莫哈末Elfie Nieshaem Juferi
It is well-known that the polemics of the Christian missionaries and Orientalists where the character of the Prophet(P) ranges from the totally ludicrous to an outright lie and blasphemy.大家都知道，當年論戰的基督教傳教士和東方地方特色的先知（P）的範圍從完全可笑的是徹頭徹尾的謊言和褻瀆。 One such polemic is with regard to the allegation that the Prophet(P) suffered from epilepsy.其中一個爭論是有關的指控，先知（規劃）患有癲癇症。 This charge on the Internet is spearheaded by one Dr. Herman H. Somers,這項收費是率先在互聯網上通過一赫爾曼博士閣下薩默斯 Read more ..閱讀更多..

Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi莫哈末Elfie Nieshaem Juferi
Sadly we currently see the efforts of the Christian missionary activity focused primarily on derailing Islam now more than any other period in history.可悲的是，我們目前看到的努力基督教傳教活動主要集中在伊斯蘭脫軌現在比任何其他時期的歷史。 Thus, we witness numerous travesties and parodies coming from them in their attempts to twist, manipulate and totally abuse historical and etymological facts.因此，我們看到許多滑稽改編和模仿來自他們在試圖扭轉，操縱和濫用的歷史和詞源完全事實。 These polemics range from a variety of the utterly hilarious這些爭論的範圍從完全不同的歡鬧 Read more ..閱讀更多..

Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi莫哈末Elfie Nieshaem Juferi

This is a short response to the missionary's 'Ishmael Is Not the Father Of Muhammad' Revisited.這是一個簡短的回應傳教士的'以實瑪利不是孩子的父親穆罕默德的再認識。 The basic premises of this travesty of the missionary claim has already been addressed in our original response.在這個基本前提嘲弄的傳教士聲稱已經解決，我們原來的回應。 The reader is invited to read that response before delving deeper into the issue.請讀者在閱讀該響應更深入地鑽研問題。
In this latest hilarity of their attempts to “sever” any在這個最新的歡鬧的企圖“切斷”任何 Read more ..閱讀更多..

It is interesting to note that most of his arguments “from a biblical [SIC] perspective” are nothing new.有趣的是，大部分他的論點：“從聖經[原文如此]的觀點”不是新鮮事。 They are arguments rehashed from orientalists in the last century who allege that the Prophet's(P) religious attitude and practices prior to the coming of the Revelations were no different from his people.他們是來自東方的論點屢次在上個世紀誰聲稱，先知（P）的宗教態度和做法的來臨之前，披露了他的人沒有什麼不同。 Most of these claims were spearheaded by DS Margoliuth大多數這些索賠是由副秘書長牽頭 Margoliuth DS Margoliuth, Mohammed and the Rise of Islam (3rd ed., 1893)副Margoliuth， 穆罕默德和伊斯蘭教的興起 （第3版。，1893年） and subsequent writers followed him, including this missionary whom we are addressing.隨後他和隨後的作家，其中包括本傳教士我們正在處理。 While the motivations of Margoliuth and the missionary in making these allegations are not the same, the similarities of Margoliuth's claims and the missionary article in question are based on several points.雖然動機的Margoliuth和傳教士在作出這些指控都是不相同，相似的Margoliuth的要求和傳教士的文章有問題，是根據幾個要點。