Scholarly decency demands that the authors of the 1977 book學術道德標準的要求，提交了1977年的書 Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic World officially repudiate a scandalous thesis, one in which they no longer believe and one that maligns the faith of more than a billion people. Hagarism：借推行伊斯蘭世界的正式否認了令人驚訝的論文，在其中，他們不再相信和信仰的一個maligns超過1億人。

It is generally well-known that a person who claims Prophethood is either someone of the best or the worst of mankind, and these two extremes can never be confused.它通常是眾所周知的，一個人要么是誰先知索賠人的最好或最壞的人類，而這兩個極端不能混為一談。 This is true indeed, due to the fact that he is either a truthful Prophet of God, thus it is accepted that he should be one of the best and most perfect person, an example par excellence .這確實是真的，因為事實上，他要么是一個真實的上帝的先知，因此它被接受，他應該是一個最好的和最完美的人，一個卓越的例子。 Or, if he is a liar against God — and this is the most terrible of lies — there he is one of the worst and most wicked person to ever walk the earth.或者，如果他是一個騙子對上帝 - 這是最可怕的謊言 - 在那裡，他是其中一個最嚴重和最邪惡的人，永遠走在地上。 This big difference is too great to be missed by any lay person, let alone smart and intelligent individuals.這個大差距過大錯過任何業外人士，更遑論個人的聰明智慧。 It is truly a very huge difference, indeed!這確實是一個非常巨大的差別，真的！

In summary, the videos will show that the claims made by the missionary Jay Smith are at best dubious, deceptive and have been dealt with extensively by Muslim scholars of the past.總之，該影片將顯示，這些索賠所作的傳教士傑伊史密斯充其量可疑，欺騙性，已經處理了廣泛的穆斯林學者過去。 The problem is that Mr. Smith is aware of these facts, but chooses to ignore them.問題是，史密斯先生知道這些事實，但他們選擇忽視。 When it comes to the Qur'an he will transform into a liberal but when it comes to the Bible he will transform into a right-wing, conservative inerranist.當談到他的古蘭經將轉變為一個開放的，但是當涉及到聖經，他會變成一個右翼保守inerranist。 This shows his own inconsistency in dealing with the issues present.這表明他自己在處理不一致的問題存在。 If he was serious in the things he has to say about the Qur'an, then we wonder how he can still believe in the Bible as in inerrant document.如果他是嚴重的事情，他說對古蘭經的話，我們不知道他仍然可以相信在聖經無誤文件。

A response to the Christian missionary and polemicist, Jay Smith's video, “Is The Qu'ran Corrupted?阿回應基督教傳教士和辯論家，傑伊史密斯的視頻“，是古蘭經損壞？ Biblical Characters in the Qu'ran” by 聖經人物在古蘭經“的 Iqra Productions伊克拉製作 . 。 This video will show that the sources that the Christian missionary Jay Smith uses are dubious, deceptive and have been dealt with extensively by Muslim scholars of the past.這部影片將顯示源基督教傳教士傑伊史密斯用途是可疑的，欺騙性的，並已處理了廣泛的穆斯林學者過去。 It also exposes the weaknesses of the Bible narratives and challenges the missionary to explain the similarities of the Bible narratives with earlier sources and texts.它的弱點也暴露了聖經敘述和挑戰的傳教士解釋相似的聖經敘述與早前的來源和文本。

Of all the Muslim rulers who ruled vast territories of India from 712 to 1857 CE, probably no one has received as much condemnation from Western and Hindu writers as Aurangzeb.在所有的穆斯林統治者誰統治廣闊領土，印度從 712至1857年行政長官，大概沒有人收到許多來自西方和印度譴責作家為奧朗則布。 He has been castigated as a religious Muslim who was anti-Hindu, who taxed them, who tried to convert them, who discriminated against them in awarding high administrative positions, and who interfered in their religious matters.他一直被指責為一個穆斯林誰是反印度教，他們誰納稅，誰試圖將它們轉換，誰對他們的歧視在授予行政職位高，誰在干涉他們的宗教事務。 This view has been heavily promoted in the government approved textbooks in schools and colleges across post-partition India (ie, after 1947).這一觀點已被大力提倡在政府批准的教科書在學校和學院在後分割印度（即1947年以後）。 These are fabrications against one of the best rulers of India who was pious, scholarly, saintly, unbiased, liberal, magnanimous, tolerant, competent, and far-sighted.這些都是捏造對一個最好的統治者誰是虔誠的印度，學術，品德高尚，公正，自由，大度，寬容，能幹和有遠見的。

Some Christian missionaries have the inherent fantasy that Sura' al-Fatihah (the first Sura' of the Qur'an) somehow supports their false pagan doctrine of the Trinity.一些基督教傳教士們的內在幻想蘇拉'基地Fatihah（第一蘇拉'的古蘭經）以某種方式支持他們的錯誤異教教義的三位一體。 They will first cite the whole ayaat (keep in mind that their main contention is with Qur'an, 1:6 — “Guide us on the straight path “) and then twist this interpretation to suit their false doctrine.他們將先舉全ayaat（記住，他們的主要論點是與古蘭經，1:6 - “引導我們在直道上的路徑 ”），然後扭轉這一解釋，以適應他們的錯誤理論。 Let us now deal with this latest polemic in the following paragraphs.讓我們現在處理這個最新的爭論在以下各段。

It has always been the missionary tradition to jump from one nefarious claim to another in trying to ascertain the nature of “Allah”.一直以來，傳統的傳教士從一個邪惡的索賠跳躍到另一個試圖確定性質的“安拉”。 We have previously shown some of the more common theories that they propagate, ranging from Allah (T) being the “moon god” to Ar-Rahman being a term for “promeganate”.我們先前的研究顯示一些較常見的理論，他們宣傳，從真主（T）的作為“月亮神”，以氬拉赫曼是一個長期的“promeganate”。 A recent missionary allegation has also been hurled against a beatific salutation of the Prophet Muhammad sallallah `alayhi wa sallam .最近的一個傳教士的指控也被摔針對幸福的稱呼先知穆罕默德的sallallah`alayhi佤薩拉姆 。 Now a new postulation of the missionary has been made in現在，一個新的公設的傳教士已經取得了 their article他們的文章 , namely that “Allah” is synonymous with the god Hubal of the pagan Makkans! ，即“真主”就是神的異教徒 Makkans哈爾！

We present below我們提出以下 a quote報價 from Tony Blair which is published in Foreign Affairs , January/February 2007, with regard to his views on the Qur'an and the religion of Islam with its proven track-record of religious tolerance.從托尼布萊爾是發表在外交部 ，1月/ 2007年2月，關於他的意見的古蘭經和伊斯蘭教的宗教與成功經驗記錄宗教寬容。 Unlike Christianity which is basically a barbaric and intolerant religion coated in paganistic rituals which calls for the destruction of religious communities different from its own (and which was exemplified in the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition and even today in Iraq and Afghanistan), Islam brought its shining light to world civilizations, setting an unprecedented example of religious tolerance and prosperity.不像基督教基本上是一個野蠻和不寬容的宗教塗在paganistic儀式，呼籲不同宗教社區銷毀其自己的（和這是體現在十字軍東征，西班牙宗教裁判所，甚至今天在伊拉克和阿富汗），伊斯蘭給我們帶來了光明的世界文明，樹立了前所未有的例子，宗教寬容與繁榮。