The following is a video lecture made by Hamza Yusof on July 14th, 1997 and in cooperation with Alhambra Productions.以下是视频讲座哈姆扎尤索夫就1997年7月14日在阿罕布拉制作和合作。 The topic of the history of the Qur'an and its compilation, and forms as part of a “Foundations of Islam” series of lectures.有关主题和历史的古兰经及其编制，形成系列的一部分，一个“基础的伊斯兰教”讲座。 Hamza Yusof gave a good historical background of the Qur'an, its history and how it was Revealed in stages to the Prophet Muhammad (P), its compilation after the passing of the Prophet (P) as well as demonstrating the textual integrity of the Qur'an, as opposed to the textual frailty of the Judeo-Christian text which stands on shaky ground.哈姆扎尤索夫介绍了可兰经，它的历史和良好的历史背景它是怎么到先知穆罕默德（规划），其汇编后的先知（P）的传递以及体现了文本的完整性阶段揭晓古兰经，作为反对犹太教和基督教的文本，不稳固地站在文字的脆弱性。 Also of interest is the Question & Answer session towards the end of this lecture which we hope our readers will find beneficial.同样是利益问题与朝这个讲座，我们希望我们的读者会发现有益的答问会结束。

The Christian missionaries tend to make the general conclusion that the Qur'an cannot be a text of divine origin because of the unacceptable meanings included in it.Perhaps they are correct in this conclusion and we may be inclined to agree with them due to the following reasons.基督教传教士往往使一般的结论，即古兰经不能是不可接受的，因为神的起源文字的含义，包括他们在it.Perhaps这一结论是正确的，我们可能会倾向于同意他们由于以下原因。

In response to our argument that Paul's fumbling of the Epimenides paradox is proof that the ad-hoc “apostle” was not inspired after all, one Christian has raised an objection.为响应我们的论点，保罗的悖论的Epimenides摸索，这证明了特设的“使徒”，并不是所有的启发后，一个基督教提出异议。 The attempted rebuttal acknowledges the paradoxical nature of Epimenides' statement, but then makes the bizarre claim that Paul's statement is true nonetheless due to other elements attributed to the Cretan “prophet” by the “apostle”.试图进行辩驳承认了Epimenides'语句矛盾的性质，但然后使离奇索赔，保罗的说法是正确的但是由于其他因素归因于“使徒”的克里特岛的“先知”。