The following is a video lecture made by Hamza Yusof on July 14th, 1997 and in cooperation with Alhambra Productions.以下是視頻講座由哈姆扎尤索夫在1997年7月14日在阿罕布拉合作製作。 The topic of the history of the Qur'an and its compilation, and forms as part of a “Foundations of Islam” series of lectures.該主題的歷史的古蘭經及其編制，形成的一部分，一個“基礎的伊斯蘭”系列講座。 Hamza Yusof gave a good historical background of the Qur'an, its history and how it was Revealed in stages to the Prophet Muhammad (P), its compilation after the passing of the Prophet (P) as well as demonstrating the textual integrity of the Qur'an, as opposed to the textual frailty of the Judeo-Christian text which stands on shaky ground.哈姆扎尤索夫了良好的歷史背景，可蘭經，它的歷史以及它如何分階段透露先知穆罕默德（規劃），其編制的及格後，先知（規劃），以及展示完整的文本古蘭經，而不是文本脆弱的猶太教和基督教文本，站在搖搖欲墜的理由。 Also of interest is the Question & Answer session towards the end of this lecture which we hope our readers will find beneficial….還感興趣的是問答會議臨近結束本次講座，我們希望我們的讀者會發現有益的...。 Read More閱讀更多

The Christian missionaries tend to make the general conclusion that the Qur'an cannot be a text of divine origin because of the unacceptable meanings included in it.Perhaps they are correct in this conclusion and we may be inclined to agree with them due to the following reasons….基督教傳教士往往使總的結論是不能古蘭經文字神聖的起源是因為不能接受的含義包括it.Perhaps他們在這個結論是正確的，我們可能會傾向於同意他們由於以下理由...。 Read More閱讀更多

In response to our argument that Paul's fumbling of the Epimenides paradox is proof that the ad-hoc “apostle” was not inspired after all, one Christian has raised an objection.為響應我們的論點，保羅的摸索的Epimenides矛盾，這證明了特設的“使徒”畢竟是沒有靈感，一個基督徒都提出了異議。 The attempted rebuttal acknowledges the paradoxical nature of Epimenides' statement, but then makes the bizarre claim that Paul's statement is true nonetheless due to other elements attributed to the Cretan “prophet” by the “apostle”….試圖進行辯駁承認矛盾的性質 Epimenides'語句，然後使離奇，但聲稱，保羅的說法是正確的但是由於其他因素歸結為克里特島“先知”的“使徒”...。 Read More閱讀更多