Bismika Alllahuma Bismika Alllahuma

For those who are familiar with the extremist Islamophobic website called “Faithfreedom International”, the name of its founder Ali Sina (a pseudonym) is synonymous with the bigotry and vile rhetoric often displayed against Muslims and Islam.對於那些誰熟悉的極端仇視伊斯蘭教的網站名為“Faithfreedom國際”的名稱，其創始人阿里新浪（化名），就是與偏執和邪惡的言辭中經常顯示對穆斯林和伊斯蘭教。 This was a person who openly advocated for the atomic bomb to be used on Muslim populations and have many times declared that he will “wipe out” Islam within 30 years.這是誰的人公開鼓吹的原子彈用在穆斯林人口，並多次宣布，他將“消滅”伊斯蘭在30年內。 Now this relatively unknown figure within academic circles — apart from becoming the self-appointed hero for the cause of Islamophobia, bigotry and the new emerging school of lay-people and pseudo-scholars — has moved beyond the world that he is more accustomed with on the internet.現在，這個數字相對未知學術界-除了成為自我任命的英雄事業伊斯蘭恐懼症，偏執和新出現的學校佈局人民和偽學者-已經超越了世界，他更習慣於在互聯網。

His Majesty King Abdullah I of Jordan (1882 – 1951)阿卜杜拉國王陛下，我約旦（1882 - 1951）
Summary: This fascinating essay, written by King Hussein's grandfather King Abdullah, appeared in the United States six months before the 1948 Arab-Israeli War.摘要：這迷人的文章，寫的侯賽因國王的祖父阿卜杜拉國王，出現在美國的前6個月1948年阿以戰爭。 In the article, King Abdullah disputes the mistaken view that Arab opposition to Zionism (and later the state of Israel) is because of longstanding religious or ethnic hatred.在文章中，阿卜杜拉國王爭端的錯誤觀點，即阿拉伯國家反對猶太复國主義（以及後來的國家以色列的）是因為長期的宗教或種族仇恨。 Read more ..閱讀更多..

Glenn C. Altschuler格倫長阿爾丘勒

Journalist Sherry Jones, the Montana and Idaho correspondent for the international news agency the Bureau of National Affairs, maintains that she envisioned The Jewel of Medina, her fictionalized account of A'isha Abi Bakr, the child bride of Muhammad, as a “bridge builder.” But even before it was published, the novel became a casualty of the clash of civilizations.記者謝裡瓊斯，蒙大拿州和愛達荷州的記者，國際新聞社局，國家事務，認為她所設想的麥地那的寶石，她虛構的考慮A'isha阿比港，兒童新娘穆罕默德，作為“橋樑建設者。“不過，即使在它出版的小說成為事故的文明衝突。

Occasionally, we come across Christians face-to-face and, more frequently, on the Internet, who, when informed that the text of the gospels underwent corruption during their transmission, often react with the following type of questions: “When?有時，我們遇到基督徒面對面的臉，更頻繁，在互聯網上，誰當得知文經歷的福音傳送期間貪污，往往反應以下類型的問題：“什麼時候？ Who did the corruption? 誰做的腐敗？ In what country? 在哪個國家？ Before or after Muhammad? 穆罕默德之前或之後？ Why was it done? 為什麼這件事？ How come no one noticed it?” These type of seemingly “innocent” questions merely reveal the incalculably colossal ignorance of the person in question. 怎麼沒人注意呢？“這些類型的看似”無辜“的問題僅僅是揭示了不可估量的巨大無知的人的問題。 Christians who pose such questions do not seem to realize how utterly foolish they come across to anyone who are familiar with at least the very basics of textual criticism.基督徒誰提出這些問題似乎並沒有意識到他們是如何完全愚蠢的人遇到誰熟悉至少非常基本的考證。 Thus, the poor questioner only succeeds in on humiliating no one else but himself.因此，貧困問題的議員只成功地在沒有其他人羞辱，但他自己。 Christian apologists and missionaries need to stop posing such outdated, absurd questions since it reflects quite badly upon their intelligence and gives others a very bad impression of them.基督教辯護者和傳教士必須放下身段這種過時的，荒謬的問題，因為它反映了相當嚴重的情報後，給人一個非常壞的印象，其中。

Christians might argue that nevertheless we need lofty ideals to strive for, even if they are virtually unattainable.基督徒可能認為，儘管如此，我們需要崇高的理想追求，即使是完全無法實現。 Muslims might reply that it is detrimental for public morality if unattainable rules are promoted which, of course, are constantly violated by everybody in sight, because that (Christian) approach creates a climate of, and promotes, hypocrisy at a massive scale.穆斯林可能會說，這不利於公眾道德，如果達不到規定的推廣，當然，經常受到侵犯大家都看不到，因為這（基督教）方法創建一個氣氛，並促進這些虛偽的大規模。 I share the latter judgment, being afraid that people used to violating basic rules of their professed moral code might become cynical about morality as such.我同意後者的判斷，怕，以前的人違反其基本規則宣稱的道德準則有可能成為頗有微詞道德等。 Indeed there is divine wisdom behind the fact that all religious obligations placed on Muslims while not being easy to fulfill are all within reach of the average believer.事實上，有神聖智慧的背後是所有宗教義務放在穆斯林但不容易實現都在達到平均信徒。