The Pagan Christ(ianity)

It is acknowledged that the Christianity of today is based on the combined doctrines of various mystery religions in the ancient world. The doctrines of the “Trinity” and “incarnation” were borrowed from the pagans. In fact, the whole religion was fabricated after the departure of Jesus. The legendary stories of “man-god” saviors dying for the sins of their people (and rising three days later) were commonly propagated as a feature in the prevailing Roman cults of the day. It is interesting to note that in the apocryphal writings of the Gospel of the Nazorenes, the following was attributed to Jesus (P) which ran contrary to the beliefs of the modern-day Christians.

Jesus was teaching his disciples in the outer court of the Temple and one of them said unto him: Master, it is said by the priests that without shedding of blood there is no remission. Can then the blood offering of the law take away sin? And Jesus answered: No blood offering, of beast or bird, or man, can take away sin, for how can the conscience be purged from sin by the shedding of innocent blood? Nay, it will increase the condemnation. 1

The Christianity that we know today simply plagiarized the stories and foisted them upon Jesus (P).

Tom Harper writes:

The divine teacher is called, is tested by the “adversary”, gathers disciples, heals the sick, preaches the Good News about God’s kingdom, finally runs afoul of his bitter enemies, suffers, dies, and is resurrected after three days. This is the total pattern of the sun god in all the ancient dramas.2

A very important part of the pagan faiths was the belief in a god who was young and handsome and was supposed to have died or mutilated himself for the sake of mankind.3 The dogma of the Incarnation was taken into Christianity, like many other Christian doctrines, from paganism. In pre-Christian mythologies, we often read of the hero being regarded as a God. The Hindus of India even today worship their ancient heroes, Rama and Krishna, as incarnations of Vishnu, the second person of the Hindu Trinity. Islam has liberated its followers from the bondage of such superstitions by rejecting the dogma of the Incarnation.4

It seems that Jesus was actually the Sun of God, and not the “Son of God”, yet both of these titles are pagan, ascribed to Jesus after his departure. No wonder that the early Christians of Egypt were accused of sun worship. Jesus rejected the title “Son of God”5 and that is why the Qur’an rejects the alleged sonship of Jesus (P), because it is entirely pagan in origin.

The authentic hadith says:

Narrated ‘Umar: “I heard the Prophet saying, “Do not exaggerate in praising me as the Christians praised the son of Mary, for I am only a Slave. So, call me the Slave of Allah and His Apostle.”6

Jesus (P) was sent by God to preach the Gospel and Torah to the Children of Israel. He was a Prophet and Messenger of God who claimed no divinity. He was transformed into God after his departure at the Council of Nicea, the pagan Emperor Constantine made the decree, yet Jesus said “The Father is greater than I”7 and “I can do nothing of my own authority”8

The “Christians” corrupted the teachings of Jesus after his disappearance; they replaced the Gospel of Jesus with the corrupted Gospel of Paul. Christianity today is indeed the Gospel of Paul, the corrupter of the Gospel of Jesus. What is the significance for our faith and for our religious life, the fact that the Gospel of Paul is different from the Gospel of Jesus?

The attitude which Paul himself takes up towards the Gospel of Jesus is that he does not repeat it in the words of Jesus, and does not appeal to its authority….The fateful thing is that the Greek, the Catholic, and the Protestant theologies all contain the Gospel of Paul in a form which does not continue the Gospel of Jesus, but displaces it.9

It is the consensus of the scholars that where the origins of Christianity is concerned, it can be invariably be summed up as follows:

Christianity began as a cult with almost wholly pagan origins and motivations in the first century, “and by the fourth it had utterly turned its back on Paganism and repudiated very hint of…connection with it, loading it with contempt from that day to this.10

Thus it is clear that:

The worship of suffering gods was to be found on all sides, and the belief in the torture of the victims in the rites of human sacrifice for the redemption from sin was very general. The gods Osiris, Attis, Adonis, Dionysos, Herakles, Prometheus, and others, had all suffered for mankind; and thus the Servant of Yahweh was also conceived as having to be wounded for’ men’s transgressions. But as I say, this conception had passed into the background in the days of Jesus”11

A very important part of the pagan faiths was the belief in a god who was young and handsome and was supposed to have died or mutilated himself for the sake of mankind.12 The Christian doctrine of atonement was greatly colored by the influence of the mystery religions, especially Mithraism. 13

From the Islamic perspective, Mawdudi concludes as follows:

The false tendencies, born of centuries of deviations, ignorance and malpractice, now took another form. Though they accepted their Prophets during their lives and practiced their teachings, after their deaths they introduced their own distorted ideas into their religions. They adopted novel methods of worshipping God; some even took to the worship of their Prophets. They made the Prophets the incarnations of God or the sons of God; some associated their Prophets with God in His Divinity.14

And certainly, only God knows best! bismika-tombstone The Pagan Christ(ianity)

Footnotes

  1. Gospel of the Nazorenes, Lection 33, verses 1-2 []
  2. Tom Harper, The Pagan Christ, p. 145 []
  3. A.D. Ajijola, The Myth of the Cross []
  4. Ulfat Aziz-Us-Samad, Islam and Christianity, Mrs. International Islamic Federation of Student Organizations, p. 38 []
  5. Luke 4:41 []
  6. Sahih Bukhari, Kitab Bhavan, New Delhi, India, 1987, translated by M. Khan, Volume 4, Book 55, Number 654 []
  7. John 14:28 []
  8. John 5:30 []
  9. Albert Schweitzer, The Quest for the Historical Jesus []
  10. Tom Harper, op. cit., p. 51 []
  11. Arthur Weigall, The Paganism in Our Christiantiy, 1928, p. 106 []
  12. A.D. Ajijola, op. cit. []
  13. Yousuf Saleem, What is Christianity, p.87 []
  14. Abdul Ala Mawdudi, Towards Understanding Islam, p. 39 []

3 Comments

  1. MODERN DAY PAGANS leave christianties pagan krist for the ORIGINAL

    “I feel very emotional,” said Ms Peppa, a writer. “We have been persecuted for 16-and-a-half centuries but now we are here. This is our human right. And we shall carry on worshipping at our temples. They have now been put to proper use.

    “This is as important to us, as prayers are for Muslims, Christians or Hindus,” said Apollonius, a former taverna owner from Melbourne, Australia.

    He abandoned the Church for the 12 Gods, because ‘they make me feel whole, they make me feel part of the universe.”

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6285397.stm

    NOTE SHE SAID “WE HAVE BEEN PERSECUTED…”
    sounds like for crosstianity sez

  2. MENJ, Tom Harper’s allegiations are completely rejected wholesale by all scholars. He is a conspiracy theorist journalist. Can you provide any reference to any scholar who takes his work or allegations seriously as correct?

  3. “…pre-Christian mythologies, we often read of the hero being regarded as a God. The Hindus of India even today worship their ancient heroes, Rama and Krishna, as incarnations of Vishnu, the second person of the Hindu Trinity.”

    E doherty:
    On the other hand, they say a picture is worth a thousand words. British traveller Edward Moor around 1800 brought back many sketches of Hindu sculptures and monuments, some which depicted a figure apparently crucified, with nail holes in feet and hands. Moor’s publication of these travels and sketches was edited and censored at the behest of Christian authorities of the time in Britain, while other reports from India suffered a similar fate. Kersey Graves reports:

    (Sir Godfrey Higgins) informs us that a report on the Hindoo religion, made out by a deputation from the British Parliament, sent to India for the purpose of examining their sacred books and monuments, being left in the hands of a Christian bishop at Calcutta, and with instructions to forward it to England, was found, on its arrival in London, to be so horribly mutilated and eviscerated as to be scarcely cognizable. The account of the crucifixion was gone—cancelled out. The inference is patent. [Sixteen Crucified Saviors, p.107]

    Acharya S, in her recent Suns of God, tells a similar story, of “plates and an entire chapter removed [from Moor’s publication], which have luckily been restored in a recent edition of the original text” [p.243], although descriptions of this missing material have long been available through Godfrey Higgins who examined Moor’s original work in the British Museum during the 1800s. This is part of a thorough examination in one chapter of Suns of God, of the whole question of whether Krishna was regarded, at least in some circles, as crucified. There are multiple versions of his death (as there are in most ancient mythology attached to savior gods), and it is possible that some form of ‘crucifixion’, probably on a tree, is one of them. Acharya refers to other cases of apparent destruction of records and mutilation of texts in modern times, by ecclesiastical interests seeking to hide the evidence of parallels. To this we must add the destruction caused by conflicts like World War II, a situation which has made it more difficult than ever for modern researchers to track down and verify the existence of such parallels in the primary record. Dismissal by modern apologists of such conditions and practices as some kind of nutty conspiracy theory is unwise, as Christian history almost from its beginnings is full of wanton destruction of anything that could call into question the veracity and originality of the Christian faith.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *